OMG!! John Moore is right! Nibiru is here!!! | |
kcdub0184 User ID: 17585310 United States 07/13/2012 07:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it were here 3600 years ago..how did some of the ancients survive it? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17629467 in freakin caves deep underground forget about trying to survive on the surface these peeps were already living in there any major type of civilization will be easily wiped out if this shit came true. I asked the question cause people were saying it will be impossible to survive unless you are deep in sophisticated bunkers. But if it's true that it was here before then obviously you can survive with primitive means. I dont believe the ancients were as primitive as pple think. There has been technologies discovered beyond what we are capable of today...government tries to make it seem like they were a bunch of monkeys but they are full of shit ~the secret to life is to AwakeN before death~(realizing there is no death)~ ~How would you approach life if you knew your every thought/emotion dictated every aspect of your projected physical reality?~ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13332532 Canada 07/13/2012 07:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A couple of weeks ago Nibirutards claimed a highly advanced race of aliens blew the planet up. Of course, it was a nice way to cover your asses when Nibiru turns out to be a no-show. Now, once again, we're threated by this imaginary object. Which is it, folks? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1473577 This. Oh wait, BUT THE VIDEOS OF LENS FLARE PROVES IT |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19310850 United States 07/13/2012 07:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
WoahBundy User ID: 19127478 United States 07/13/2012 07:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it were here 3600 years ago..how did some of the ancients survive it? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17629467 in freakin caves deep underground forget about trying to survive on the surface these peeps were already living in there any major type of civilization will be easily wiped out if this shit came true. I asked the question cause people were saying it will be impossible to survive unless you are deep in sophisticated bunkers. But if it's true that it was here before then obviously you can survive with primitive means. I dont believe the ancients were as primitive as pple think. There has been technologies discovered beyond what we are capable of today...government tries to make it seem like they were a bunch of monkeys but they are full of shit I agree that the Gummint is full of shit, but if the ancients were so smart, why are they gone? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14899339 United States 07/13/2012 07:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nibiru would be easily spotted by amateur astronomers across the globe and yet nothing. I mean come on. Anything planet sized anywhere near us would be visible if its a dark star we're one unlucky bastards because they don't last long and just happened to wander in? I mean there's nothing supporting this claim other then just bunk, I give up on it. Show me some fucking proof. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14249834 United States 07/13/2012 08:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nibiru would be easily spotted by amateur astronomers across the globe and yet nothing. I mean come on. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14899339 Anything planet sized anywhere near us would be visible if its a dark star we're one unlucky bastards because they don't last long and just happened to wander in? I mean there's nothing supporting this claim other then just bunk, I give up on it. Show me some fucking proof. No they wouldn't if it was coming from the southern hemisphere. You would need something in space or at the south pole. The SPT wasn't built until 2007 and who knows exactly where they're looking. So that's one possible telescope in the world that amateurs have access to. |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 07/13/2012 08:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nibiru would be easily spotted by amateur astronomers across the globe and yet nothing. I mean come on. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14899339 Anything planet sized anywhere near us would be visible if its a dark star we're one unlucky bastards because they don't last long and just happened to wander in? I mean there's nothing supporting this claim other then just bunk, I give up on it. Show me some fucking proof. No they wouldn't if it was coming from the southern hemisphere. You would need something in space or at the south pole. Wrong. Anyone anywhere in the southern hemisphere would be able to see it. You would NOT need to be in space or at the south pole. People in australia, new zealand, south america, etc would all see it as well. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19714091 United States 07/13/2012 08:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can someone explain, or debunk this? it's NASA saying there is a 10th planet. [link to science.nasa.gov] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19714091 United States 07/13/2012 08:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can someone explain, or debunk this? it's NASA saying there is a 10th planet. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19714091 [link to science.nasa.gov] um... July 29, 2005: "It's definitely bigger than Pluto." So says Dr. Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology who announced today the discovery of a new planet in the outer solar system. see captionThe planet, which hasn't been officially named yet, was found by Brown and colleagues using the Samuel Oschin Telescope at Palomar Observatory near San Diego. It is currently about 97 times farther from the sun than Earth, or 97 Astronomical Units (AU). For comparison, Pluto is 40 AU from the sun. [link to science.nasa.gov] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19714091 United States 07/13/2012 08:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can someone explain, or debunk this? it's NASA saying there is a 10th planet. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19714091 [link to science.nasa.gov] um... July 29, 2005: "It's definitely bigger than Pluto." So says Dr. Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology who announced today the discovery of a new planet in the outer solar system. see captionThe planet, which hasn't been officially named yet, was found by Brown and colleagues using the Samuel Oschin Telescope at Palomar Observatory near San Diego. It is currently about 97 times farther from the sun than Earth, or 97 Astronomical Units (AU). For comparison, Pluto is 40 AU from the sun. [link to science.nasa.gov] wtf again. 10th Planet Posted 01.10.06 NOVA scienceNOW In 2005, astronomer Mike Brown and his team at Caltech discovered a new planet out beyond Neptune. Slightly larger than Pluto, the new object was nicknamed Xena (after the TV show "Xena: The Warrior Princess"). But is Xena a planet? For that matter, is Pluto a planet? Brown’s discovery sparks a controversy over what exactly is meant by planethood. [link to www.pbs.org] |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 07/13/2012 08:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can someone explain, or debunk this? it's NASA saying there is a 10th planet. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19714091 [link to science.nasa.gov] That's now known as Eris and it's one of many such Kuiper belt objects. I just photographed one of them last night, Makemake. Eris was the catalyst for demoting pluto to dwarf planet status, otherwise we would have had to count every single dwarf planet as a full planet as well. At one time we actually did count every rock we found out there as a planet, and at one point under that criteria we had 18 planets. [link to spaceweather.com] Now we only count major planets that are both large enough to be spherical and have cleared the area of their orbit of debris. Neither Pluto nor Eris have done that. Last Edited by Astromut on 07/13/2012 08:17 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19714091 United States 07/13/2012 08:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 07/13/2012 08:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17629467 United States 07/13/2012 08:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18375662 in freakin caves deep underground forget about trying to survive on the surface these peeps were already living in there any major type of civilization will be easily wiped out if this shit came true. I asked the question cause people were saying it will be impossible to survive unless you are deep in sophisticated bunkers. But if it's true that it was here before then obviously you can survive with primitive means. I dont believe the ancients were as primitive as pple think. There has been technologies discovered beyond what we are capable of today...government tries to make it seem like they were a bunch of monkeys but they are full of shit I agree that the Gummint is full of shit, but if the ancients were so smart, why are they gone? I guess my real point was..mankind have survived the passing of Nibiru before..so not to lose hope. But..if it's it true that even ancients had sophisticated technologies at their disposal and only the elite of their time survived..then the average guy with average means should just give up any hope of surviving this thing. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19714091 United States 07/13/2012 08:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can someone explain, or debunk this? it's NASA saying there is a 10th planet. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19714091 [link to science.nasa.gov] That's now known as Eris and it's one of many such Kuiper belt objects. I just photographed one of them last night, Makemake. Eris was the catalyst for demoting pluto to dwarf planet status, otherwise we would have had to count every single dwarf planet as a full planet as well. At one time we actually did count every rock we found out there as a planet, and at one point under that criteria we had 18 planets. [link to spaceweather.com] Now we only count major planets that are both large enough to be spherical and have cleared the area of their orbit of debris. Neither Pluto nor Eris have done that. but it states it's a planet bigger than pluto in our solar system 6 years ago. plain and simple. so now it becomes a question of determining its current position from where it was in 2006. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18375662 United States 07/13/2012 08:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18375662 in freakin caves deep underground forget about trying to survive on the surface these peeps were already living in there any major type of civilization will be easily wiped out if this shit came true. I asked the question cause people were saying it will be impossible to survive unless you are deep in sophisticated bunkers. But if it's true that it was here before then obviously you can survive with primitive means. one word good luck. two words, bro. i think you miscounted. whatever man one phrase bottom line its all BS bring the doom already! All i see is snake oil. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19714091 United States 07/13/2012 08:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18912621 United Kingdom 07/13/2012 08:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 07/13/2012 08:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can someone explain, or debunk this? it's NASA saying there is a 10th planet. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19714091 [link to science.nasa.gov] That's now known as Eris and it's one of many such Kuiper belt objects. I just photographed one of them last night, Makemake. Eris was the catalyst for demoting pluto to dwarf planet status, otherwise we would have had to count every single dwarf planet as a full planet as well. At one time we actually did count every rock we found out there as a planet, and at one point under that criteria we had 18 planets. [link to spaceweather.com] Now we only count major planets that are both large enough to be spherical and have cleared the area of their orbit of debris. Neither Pluto nor Eris have done that. but it states it's a planet bigger than pluto in our solar system 6 years ago. plain and simple. And 150 years ago it was stated that Ceres and other asteroids were planets. So what? It's now classified as a dwarf planet. If we counted every dwarf planet as a planet, it wouldn't even be the 10th, it'd be 11th at best because Ceres was found first and orbits much closer. If we go by semi-major axis as ordering them, it'd be last making it the 13th. so now it becomes a question of determining its current position from where it was in 2006. Quoting: ACAgain, stop the fear mongering, its orbit brings it nowhere near us and in fact it's the farthest of the known dwarf planets. We know its orbit fairly well thanks to pre-discovery images that go back to 1954. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1067150 United States 07/13/2012 08:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nibiru would be easily spotted by amateur astronomers across the globe and yet nothing. I mean come on. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14899339 Anything planet sized anywhere near us would be visible if its a dark star we're one unlucky bastards because they don't last long and just happened to wander in? I mean there's nothing supporting this claim other then just bunk, I give up on it. Show me some fucking proof. Dumb ass, you need infrared on your telescope to see it, that is professional grade equipment, you can't buy that online. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19714091 United States 07/13/2012 08:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why not? It's just a dwarf planet in the Kuiper belt, calm down and stop fear mongering. wow, u just lied dude, and it's easily provable. NASA states object in belt, but this new planet is much much larger, that is why they deemed it a planet. it is not common to have new pop up planets in the solar system. NASA even contradicts your information. next i will seek its orbit. what will that say? |
Kane User ID: 6238205 United States 07/13/2012 08:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18375662 in freakin caves deep underground forget about trying to survive on the surface these peeps were already living in there any major type of civilization will be easily wiped out if this shit came true. I asked the question cause people were saying it will be impossible to survive unless you are deep in sophisticated bunkers. But if it's true that it was here before then obviously you can survive with primitive means. I dont believe the ancients were as primitive as pple think. There has been technologies discovered beyond what we are capable of today...government tries to make it seem like they were a bunch of monkeys but they are full of shit I agree that the Gummint is full of shit, but if the ancients were so smart, why are they gone? Do you not realize that we ARE descendants of the ancients? They only left once certain areas experienced resource depletion, and (a popular theory) is that there was a previous pole shift during the time of Thoth (part of the reason a part of Alexandria Egypt, Lemuria and Atlantis are underwater) |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 07/13/2012 08:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why not? It's just a dwarf planet in the Kuiper belt, calm down and stop fear mongering. can u provide information that is visual to show its travel in the solar system? even they say it is hard to see. I don't have time to go render it. Here are the orbital elements at an epoch of right this minute (literally) Feel free to plug into your program of choice. It's not a threat. EC= 5.869030899666351E+06 QR= 2.718359589063990E+09 IN= 6.931057027232693E+01 OM= 1.974630303225256E+02 W = 2.732716358626617E+02 Tp= 2461718.355667868629 N = 3.628947124646722E+00 MA=-1.754523826512488E+09 TA= 2.808496837010831E+02 A =-4.631701721639764E+02 AD= 9.999999000000000E+99 PR= 9.999999000000000E+99 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19714091 United States 07/13/2012 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can someone explain, or debunk this? it's NASA saying there is a 10th planet. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19714091 [link to science.nasa.gov] That's now known as Eris and it's one of many such Kuiper belt objects. I just photographed one of them last night, Makemake. Eris was the catalyst for demoting pluto to dwarf planet status, otherwise we would have had to count every single dwarf planet as a full planet as well. At one time we actually did count every rock we found out there as a planet, and at one point under that criteria we had 18 planets. [link to spaceweather.com] Now we only count major planets that are both large enough to be spherical and have cleared the area of their orbit of debris. Neither Pluto nor Eris have done that. but it states it's a planet bigger than pluto in our solar system 6 years ago. plain and simple. And 150 years ago it was stated that Ceres and other asteroids were planets. So what? It's now classified as a dwarf planet. If we counted every dwarf planet as a planet, it wouldn't even be the 10th, it'd be 11th at best because Ceres was found first and orbits much closer. If we go by semi-major axis as ordering them, it'd be last making it the 13th. so now it becomes a question of determining its current position from where it was in 2006. Quoting: ACAgain, stop the fear mongering, its orbit brings it nowhere near us and in fact it's the farthest of the known dwarf planets. We know its orbit fairly well thanks to pre-discovery images that go back to 1954. again, Cal tech, NASA, JPL all contradict your message. they say objects are common i belt, but not this large planet. they say they exactly. before i find it...want to provide its orbit. and not your opinion, as that seems questionable now. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14942629 United States 07/13/2012 08:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19679604 United States 07/13/2012 08:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The solar system/universe are ever changing. All the small minded bought off scientist want to tell you is eveything is okay. Just go to work for your slave master corporations and don't think, |
TDJ User ID: 17954117 United States 07/13/2012 08:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Looks like you guys shut down The Liberty Man's website. LOL [link to www.thelibertyman.com] If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already. Bob Marley “The duty of a patriot is to protect his country from its government.” THOMAS PAINE (1737-1809) Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one. Bruce Lee |
Astromut Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 07/13/2012 08:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why not? It's just a dwarf planet in the Kuiper belt, calm down and stop fear mongering. wow, u just lied dude, and it's easily provable. NASA states object in belt, but this new planet is much much larger, that is why they deemed it a planet. It IS a dwarf planet, I didn't lie, and you just lied about my lying. [link to www.space.com] it is not common to have new pop up planets in the solar system. NASA even contradicts your information. Quoting: ACnext i will seek its orbit. what will that say? No, NASA does not contradict my information. [link to www.nasa.gov] You keep citing articles that pre-date the IAU decision to demote Pluto from planet status and establish the dwarf planets. I see now that you're just here to lie about me and play fear mongering games. I gave you the orbital elements, now... |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 19507663 Netherlands 07/13/2012 08:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | again, Cal tech, NASA, JPL all contradict your message. they say objects are common i belt, but not this large planet. they say they exactly. before i find it...want to provide its orbit. and not your opinion, as that seems questionable now. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19714091 They are called Trans-Neptunian objects and they are as dangerous as Pluto, IOW not at all. [link to en.wikipedia.org] Call CalTech, Call NASA, call JPL, call a North Korean astronomer, they will all tell you the same thing. Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
WoahBundy User ID: 19127478 United States 07/13/2012 08:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17629467 I asked the question cause people were saying it will be impossible to survive unless you are deep in sophisticated bunkers. But if it's true that it was here before then obviously you can survive with primitive means. I dont believe the ancients were as primitive as pple think. There has been technologies discovered beyond what we are capable of today...government tries to make it seem like they were a bunch of monkeys but they are full of shit I agree that the Gummint is full of shit, but if the ancients were so smart, why are they gone? I guess my real point was..mankind have survived the passing of Nibiru before..so not to lose hope. But..if it's it true that even ancients had sophisticated technologies at their disposal and only the elite of their time survived..then the average guy with average means should just give up any hope of surviving this thing. Alright. No argument from me. You're correct. ;) |