Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,343 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 671,787
Pageviews Today: 840,083Threads Today: 147Posts Today: 2,864
06:13 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

US refusing to help Syrian rebels until after Nov. election?

 
luke777
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 19907579
United States
07/17/2012 12:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
US refusing to help Syrian rebels until after Nov. election?
[link to www.telegraph.co.uk]

"Barack Obama’s US government has warned its western allies and Syria’s opposition groups that it can do nothing to intervene in the country’s crisis until after November’s presidential election, The Daily Telegraph has learned.

Despite mounting fury from the Syrian rebels, who are seeking assistance for their efforts to overthrow the Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, the White House has refused all requests for heavy weapons and intelligence support."

But I thought the U.S is supplying and supporting the Rebels already. How does this make sense? Does this mean doom off until after elections?

And I thought all sources pointed to war before elections even to help Obama win or enforce martial law? Can anyone help me figure this out?


Last Edited by luke777 on 07/18/2012 05:39 PM
luke777
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 550833
United States
07/17/2012 12:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: US refusing to help Syrian rebels until after Nov. election?
So.....Just who are the rebels? Are they going from country to country as paid killers?




.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 19907579
United States
07/17/2012 12:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: US refusing to help Syrian rebels until after Nov. election?
So.....Just who are the rebels? Are they going from country to country as paid killers?




.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 550833


Yes
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16854076
Australia
07/17/2012 12:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: US refusing to help Syrian rebels until after Nov. election?
[link to www.telegraph.co.uk]

"Barack Obama’s US government has warned its western allies and Syria’s opposition groups that it can do nothing to intervene in the country’s crisis until after November’s presidential election, The Daily Telegraph has learned.

Despite mounting fury from the Syrian rebels, who are seeking assistance for their efforts to overthrow the Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, the White House has refused all requests for heavy weapons and intelligence support."

But I thought the U.S is supplying and supporting the Rebels already. How does this make sense? Does this mean doom off until after elections?

And I thought all sources pointed to war before elections even to help Obama win or enforce martial law? Can anyone help me figure this out?

 Quoting: luke777


Your a fucking child what would you fucking know?
luke777 (OP)

User ID: 19907579
United States
07/17/2012 12:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: US refusing to help Syrian rebels until after Nov. election?
I'm over 18 and apparently you don't know either

Last Edited by luke777 on 07/17/2012 01:20 AM
luke777
anonanon
User ID: 4148733
United States
07/17/2012 12:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: US refusing to help Syrian rebels until after Nov. election?
Help them, why? So, as in other ountries they can elect the Muslim Brotherhood or some other radical Jihadist group that will spent time and our own money on finding new ways of killing us?

No. We need to just say No more to all these crazy wars.

Of course it is despicabe what the Syrian government is doing to its own people.

But let us not get sucked into yet Muslim civil war.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19931540
United States
07/17/2012 12:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: US refusing to help Syrian rebels until after Nov. election?
[link to www.telegraph.co.uk]

"Barack Obama’s US government has warned its western allies and Syria’s opposition groups that it can do nothing to intervene in the country’s crisis until after November’s presidential election, The Daily Telegraph has learned.

Despite mounting fury from the Syrian rebels, who are seeking assistance for their efforts to overthrow the Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, the White House has refused all requests for heavy weapons and intelligence support."

But I thought the U.S is supplying and supporting the Rebels already. How does this make sense? Does this mean doom off until after elections?

And I thought all sources pointed to war before elections even to help Obama win or enforce martial law? Can anyone help me figure this out?

 Quoting: luke777


um, hasn't anyone noticed the pattern that Obama does the opposite of what he says, usually not that long after he makes statements. it's called being a liar.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 19907579
United States
07/17/2012 12:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: US refusing to help Syrian rebels until after Nov. election?
[link to www.telegraph.co.uk]

"Barack Obama’s US government has warned its western allies and Syria’s opposition groups that it can do nothing to intervene in the country’s crisis until after November’s presidential election, The Daily Telegraph has learned.

Despite mounting fury from the Syrian rebels, who are seeking assistance for their efforts to overthrow the Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, the White House has refused all requests for heavy weapons and intelligence support."

But I thought the U.S is supplying and supporting the Rebels already. How does this make sense? Does this mean doom off until after elections?

And I thought all sources pointed to war before elections even to help Obama win or enforce martial law? Can anyone help me figure this out?

 Quoting: luke777


um, hasn't anyone noticed the pattern that Obama does the opposite of what he says, usually not that long after he makes statements. it's called being a liar.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19931540

True
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16854076
Australia
07/17/2012 12:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: US refusing to help Syrian rebels until after Nov. election?
[link to www.telegraph.co.uk]

"Barack Obama’s US government has warned its western allies and Syria’s opposition groups that it can do nothing to intervene in the country’s crisis until after November’s presidential election, The Daily Telegraph has learned.

Despite mounting fury from the Syrian rebels, who are seeking assistance for their efforts to overthrow the Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, the White House has refused all requests for heavy weapons and intelligence support."

But I thought the U.S is supplying and supporting the Rebels already. How does this make sense? Does this mean doom off until after elections?

And I thought all sources pointed to war before elections even to help Obama win or enforce martial law? Can anyone help me figure this out?

 Quoting: luke777


Your a fucking child what would you fucking know?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16854076


I'm over 18 and apparently you don't know either
 Quoting: luke777


Oh OK 18 and a half big man? Whoa "shaking in my boots" at your far superior life experience and wisdom. Bet your hanging out to take that first legal drink? When you get a bit older and your mum stops wiping your ass for you you might have the wisdom to contribute and not ask mind numbingly stupid questions. "Blind Freddy" can see the answer junior
luke777 (OP)

User ID: 19907579
United States
07/17/2012 12:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: US refusing to help Syrian rebels until after Nov. election?
Um how can "blind Freddy" see the answer when no one can explain why the U.S is shifting positions when everyone said it would happen before the election? If you know the answer then make me wise and tell me?
luke777
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16854076
Australia
07/17/2012 01:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: US refusing to help Syrian rebels until after Nov. election?
Um how can "blind Freddy" see the answer when no one can explain why the U.S is shifting positions when everyone said it would happen before the election? If you know the answer then make me wise and tell me?
 Quoting: luke777


It's a lot simpler than you think. Similar situations have happened in the past. Just look.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!