Massive fire in skyscraper, arnt they supposed to collapse like building 7 lol.

No plane crashed into WTC building seven. It just collapsed like a controlled demolition.

With all these heaters and building falling we are going to have to reinvent something better. These stupid engineers should be fired for their poor workmanship!

Bring them on. They day I bow to cowards who fight in the shadows, you know the rest :)

I really dont care if I make powerful enemies, why should I. I would rather die a freeman than a lowley coward :)

And if I do make enemies then it means I am making a difference, the difference may not be big, but I am not alone :)

I have quite a few million in my army of people now who tell the truth and dont like liars :)

The level of stupid in this thread is mind boggling.

Are you for fucking real?

You know all this and yet the FBI and the 911 commission didnt?

Fucking MORAN!

What a 24 karat plonker you are!

NO plane but the North Tower crashed into building 7 taking damaging it and making it unstable

Yep. EVERY building that EVER caught on fire in ANY way is EXACTLY the same scenario as the WTC scenario - without question.

/this is what some people actually believe...

this old crap again, look a few office fires IN 2001 ONLY can bring down steel and concrete office blocks

it hasn't happened before, it hasn't happened since

it was just a fluke, stfu and take your Coolaid.

:)

seeing and inherent knowing is believing, and bullshit and rhetoric can no longer sway us from that which we know to be true and correct anymore so than can their illusions and mind games

they've lost the battle in that regard already

only you can disavow your own awareness in lieu of some bullshit they've offered up

it's up to you/us to determine and hold fast to what we know to be truth in our hearts, in every regard

the king of all babble will take the stage at some point, we have been and will be benefacted by his minions until then -

it's good practice in discernment if nothing else

Okay, but the problem with WTC 7 is the way it collapsed, you just WOULD NOT get the symetry and the free fall if it was a natural "collapse" (maybe) it would partially collapse at the damage point area, but for UNDAMAGED supporting columns to collapse AT EXACTLY the same time as the so-called damaged supports, well, this is IMPOSSIBLE, plus the free fall speed aspect, ALL, INCLUDING the undamaged columns, would HAVE TO be removed for this to happen at EXACTLY THE SAME TIME, PERIOD!

Do you get it yet?

Yes, but this building had super duper card board construction! I held up the world trade centers! Who was the engineer of this one? He must have used idiot retardant to stop the fire?

[link to www.youtube.com]

What you are basically saying is that if you knocked one leg from a four legged stool all the other undamaged three legs would collapes at exactly the same time...

[link to www.youtube.com]

He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.

Benjamin Franklin

If we had a real investigation of 911 then all the politicians would be in jail as later they would find out that they all are accomplices to the crimes of 911 by keeping it all hidden! They are all part of this travesty!

Well that sums it up. I vote the cat the next president of the USSA. To bring it back to the USA!

Yep, that cat would be a better representation of humanity than the evil assholes running things in the USSA.

AND (to add to this)...Even NIST agrees that there was FREE FALL for 1.5 seconds.

Anyone understand this? It means that whilst WTC7 was falling, for 1.5 seconds it fell as if NOTHING was stopping/below it.

- Supporting beams HAD to have been taken out ALL AT ONCE to achieve such a thing...

Simply amazing the ignorance of the Human Race sometimes.

Last Edited by DDan> on 07/18/2012 05:27 PM

I love this quote!!

Exactly.

The stupidities of the followers of enslavement are the walking dead…

The building in question, the Polat building only burned in the areas covered with Alukabond, which is a composite material. (also called Alupanel and a heap of other trade names)

It is a thin aluminium skin (about 0.3mm) on either side of a polymer inner (about 3mm). The polymer, usually a polyethylene, is supposed to have a high degree of fire retarding chemicals in it.

Obviously, these panels did not.

Because the plastic was layered between two aluminium skins, the fire, once started kind of acts like a mini rocket motor. (propellant trapped inside a hard casing, with only one exit)

The result is a pretty violent looking fire, that spreads quickly to the next panel. Ironically the glues used to bond the panels to the concrete are inflammable.

Which is what we saw.

More than likely, they will clean it all up, and re-skin this side of the building. No-one will know it ever happened.



Just for the record, I dont believe the official 911 story, nor a lot of the bogus crap the so called truth movement spews out. Hapy to take it all in, and pick this and that. September Clues, American Psi-Opera, Architects for Truth and Judy Wood have the best theories of it all in my book.
(oh and PentaCon for the other event)

Careful analysis of the photos reveals that only the FOAM in the fascia of the building burned.

Did YOU miss the line in the article:

"The building's fire-extinguishing system automatically activated. Otherwise we could have faced a huge disaster," Mayor Mustafa Sarigul told the Associated Press, adding that the inside of the tower had not been damaged by the flames.

To use this as any kind of analogy to the events of 911 show only the OP's ignorance.

Last Edited by G. House on 07/19/2012 12:02 AM

They forgot to place explosives in the building before the fire broke out.