Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,256 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,060,601
Pageviews Today: 1,378,485Threads Today: 254Posts Today: 4,680
10:11 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)

 
Noble=SnakeAirline=nw​oshill
User ID: 20004920
07/18/2012 05:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)

[link to www.youtube.com]

Recorded on Januar, 12th 2011. Gunderson has been killed by cancer on Juli, 31th 2011.

Now we know, why noble and his fellowers are trying so hard to blame us. They are very dangerous. They really would like to see us dead. By Chemtrails, Cancer or Accident doesn't matter.

Welcome to NWO-Fascism.
Welcome to the End.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 20004920
07/18/2012 05:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
29:50 min, ok english folks, here we go.



pay attention to that paper from BMBF (German Ministry of Education and Research)
[link to www.google.com]

go to 3.2.2, read!!

3.2.2 Aerosols in the stratosphere
In principle, adding reflective sub-micrometer aerosols to the stratosphere is a good method
for reducing SW solar radiation because these aerosols are inexpensive and can have a
significant effect on SW radiation (Budyko 1982). In addition, stratospheric aerosols have
a relatively long lifespan of 1 – 2 years (primarily due to the lack of rainfall) when compared
to those in the troposphere which have a lifespan of lesser than 1 week. The effectiveness of
these aerosols has already been confirmed from observing “natural experiments” in which
major volcanic eruptions caused 1° of global cooling by adding 1 million tons of sulfur (asSO2) to the stratosphere, where it was converted into an aerosol (Lacis and Mishchenko 1995).
This CE technology, which has been the subject of a relatively long-standing debate (Budyko
1982; Dickinson 1996; Teller et al. 1997; Keith 2000), became especially popular owing to the
work of Paul Crutzen (2006) (Wigley 2006; Rasch et al. 2008b). The method has considerable
potential (a reduction of many W/m2) and is in principle effective enough to offset a multiplication
of the pre-industrial CO2 concentration. Modeling studies have supported the effectiveness of
the basic method and discussed it’s possible side-effects (Govindasamy et al. 2003; Rasch et al.
2008a; Murphy 2009; Lenton and Vaughan 2009; Heckendorn et al. 2009; Jones et al. 2010).
However, as Heckendorn et al. (2009) and Pierce et al. (2010) show the method’s effectiveness
does not increase in proportion to the amount of sulfur that is added to the stratosphere. The
initial estimates of amount of sulfur that is required have already been revised upwards (Katz
2010) and the expected stratospheric lifetime of the aerosols revised downwards (Tuck et al.
2008). Although, Pierce et al. (2010) suggest avoiding these difficulties and the undesirable
warming of the lower stratosphere by directly deploying a sulfuric acid aerosol over a large
area. Unfortunately, the technical challenges of getting large amounts of either sulfur or sulfuric
acid to a height of 20 – 25 km are considerable.
There have been many proposals regarding the technological implementation of a stratospheric
aerosol shield. One patent filed in 1991 addresses the insertion of aerosols into the stratosphere
(Chang 1991). A more recent patent is for a method that uses commercial aircraft to deploy
reflective aerosols by adding a special additive to their fuel (Hucko 2009).
The Microsoftfunded company Intellectual Ventures has promoted the development of a method called a
“stratoshield”, which uses a balloon to carry a tube from the ground to the stratosphere to deliver
the aerosols, or aerosol generating chemicals, by pumping them through the tube. Keith (2010)
has also proposed to use photophoretic forces to increase the concentration and lifespan of
certain reflective particles in the stratosphere and to reduce their effect on ozone chemistry.
The side-effects of stratospheric aerosol injection have been debated in a number of
publications. Many possible negative effects on the global hydrologic cycle have been deduced
by comparing the proposed stratospheric manipulation with the largest volcanic eruption of
the 20th century, Mt. Pinatubo (Hegerl and Solomon 2009). Simulations by Ricke et al. (2010)
suggest that it is not possible to achieve cooling without changing precipitation patterns.
However, using GCM simulations Irvine et al. (2010) more optimistically suggest that it is
possible to reduce solar radiation with only minimal regional effects on precipitation. Other sideeffects also include those caused by the potentially catalytic acceleration of ozone depletion by
stratospheric particles (Heckendorn et al. 2009). Adding sulfur to the stratosphere would also
increase the acidity of rainfall in the vicinity of the addition. However, according to modeling
studies by Kravitz et al. (2009; 2010) the global effects of acidification would be negligible.
To minimize the negative side-effects of adding these aerosols Ban-Weiss and Caldeira (2010)
and Eliseev et al. (2010) propose that this method can be optimized by evenly distributing the
aerosols across different latitudes. However, not all side-effects are negative; one positive sideeffect is that these methods would increase diffuse solar radiation, which could have a positive
effect on plant productivity (Roderick et al. 2011; Mercado et al. 2009).
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 20004920
07/18/2012 05:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
ggl translation:
Tiny aerosol particles in the atmosphere affect the Earth's climate because they reflect sunlight. They are also a factor in the global water cycle as they influence cloud formation and hence rainfall. And as fine dust, they also have an impact on human health.

In the experiments on IRCELYON in Lyon under the direction of Dr. Christian George next to the university were also scientists of the French CNRS Research Foundation, the Weizmann Institute of the group of Prof. Yinon Rudich and Prof. Hartmut Herrmann of the German Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research (IfT) in Leipzig involved. The joint work of IRCELYON, Weizmann IfT and is funded by the EU project PEGASOS.

Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research e.V.

Orginal:
Winzige Aerosolpartikel in der Atmosphäre beeinflussen das Weltklima, da sie Sonnenlicht zurückstrahlen. Ebenso sind sie ein Faktor im globalen Wasserkreislauf, da sie die Wolkenbildung und damit die Niederschläge beeinflussen. Und als Feinstaub wirken sie sich auch auf die menschliche Gesundheit aus.

An den Experimenten am IRCELYON in Lyon unter der Leitung von Dr. Christian George waren neben der Universität auch Wissenschaftler der französischen Forschungsgemeinschaft CNRS, des israelischen Weizmann-Instituts aus der Gruppe von Prof. Yinon Rudich und Prof. Hartmut Herrmann vom deutschen Leibniz-Institut für Troposphärenforschung (IfT) in Leipzig beteiligt. Die gemeinsame Arbeit von IRCELYON, Weizmann und IfT wird durch das EU-Projekt PEGASOS gefördert.

Leibniz-Institut für Troposphärenforschung e. V.
 Quoting: [link to www.extremnews.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 20004920
07/18/2012 06:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
Contrails develop at temeratures under -40°C in cause of condensing water throug hot exhausted gases by planes. Within 1-15 minutes they dissapear.
Chemtrails develop throug additatives in the fuel of planes. Polymeres spreading across the sky and disperse nano-particles(Aluminum, Barium, Sulfur, ...). Via H.A.A.R.P. the metal-particles become eloctromagnetical charged and result in a wave pattern in the sky.
The effects on organisms are very dangerous. The fact that nothing in public is known about such a global scale program implies that this is the biggest holocaust on human kind ever.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 20004920
07/18/2012 07:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
There is a program by Rockefeller and his NWO-fellowers for reducement of the global population by some billions(!).
These gays think on a global scale for decades. Chemtrailing is one part of this agenda. Several effects are avieved:
- weakening the vitamin D production of humans throug reducement of natural sunlight.
- poisoning the ground for disturbing the plants abilit to grow.
- poisoning the humans for weakening the immune system and vaccaine the ppl with nano-particles and heavy metals
- creating (influenca) deseases within the population
- creation of a 'stratospheric shild' that can be electromagnetical influenced by Tesla technology. the creation of earthquakes and the manipulation of human brain activity is archieved.
Noble

User ID: 1211465
United States
07/18/2012 07:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
Gunderson was just another chemtard who fell for the BS...

nothing more.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Noble

User ID: 1211465
United States
07/18/2012 07:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
Contrails develop at temeratures under -40°C in cause of condensing water throug hot exhausted gases by planes. Within 1-15 minutes they dissapear.
Chemtrails develop throug additatives in the fuel of planes. Polymeres spreading across the sky and disperse nano-particles(Aluminum, Barium, Sulfur, ...). Via H.A.A.R.P. the metal-particles become eloctromagnetical charged and result in a wave pattern in the sky.
The effects on organisms are very dangerous. The fact that nothing in public is known about such a global scale program implies that this is the biggest holocaust on human kind ever.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20004920


Liar.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 20004920
07/18/2012 07:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
u allways want to have a proof.
the only thing u can proof is that u are a fascistic, ignorant, stupid sucker.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 20004920
07/18/2012 07:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
There is a program by Rockefeller and his NWO-fellowers for reducement of the global population by some billions(!).
These gays think on a global scale for decades. Chemtrailing is one part of this agenda. Several effects are avieved:
- weakening the vitamin D production of humans throug reducement of natural sunlight.
- poisoning the ground for disturbing the plants abilit to grow.
- poisoning the humans for weakening the immune system and vaccaine the ppl with nano-particles and heavy metals
- creating (influenca) deseases within the population
- creation of a 'stratospheric shild' that can be electromagnetical influenced by Tesla technology. the creation of earthquakes and the manipulation of human brain activity is archieved.

----------------------------------------------------------

29:50 min, History Channel explains Chemtrail technologie



----------------------------------------------------------

pay attention to that paper from BMBF (German Ministry of Education and Research)
[link to www.google.com]

go to 3.2.2, read!!

3.2.2 Aerosols in the stratosphere
In principle, adding reflective sub-micrometer aerosols to the stratosphere is a good method
for reducing SW solar radiation because these aerosols are inexpensive and can have a
significant effect on SW radiation (Budyko 1982). In addition, stratospheric aerosols have
a relatively long lifespan of 1 – 2 years (primarily due to the lack of rainfall) when compared
to those in the troposphere which have a lifespan of lesser than 1 week. The effectiveness of
these aerosols has already been confirmed from observing “natural experiments” in which
major volcanic eruptions caused 1° of global cooling by adding 1 million tons of sulfur (asSO2) to the stratosphere, where it was converted into an aerosol (Lacis and Mishchenko 1995).
This CE technology, which has been the subject of a relatively long-standing debate (Budyko
1982; Dickinson 1996; Teller et al. 1997; Keith 2000), became especially popular owing to the
work of Paul Crutzen (2006) (Wigley 2006; Rasch et al. 2008b). The method has considerable
potential (a reduction of many W/m2) and is in principle effective enough to offset a multiplication
of the pre-industrial CO2 concentration. Modeling studies have supported the effectiveness of
the basic method and discussed it’s possible side-effects (Govindasamy et al. 2003; Rasch et al.
2008a; Murphy 2009; Lenton and Vaughan 2009; Heckendorn et al. 2009; Jones et al. 2010).
However, as Heckendorn et al. (2009) and Pierce et al. (2010) show the method’s effectiveness
does not increase in proportion to the amount of sulfur that is added to the stratosphere. The
initial estimates of amount of sulfur that is required have already been revised upwards (Katz
2010) and the expected stratospheric lifetime of the aerosols revised downwards (Tuck et al.
2008). Although, Pierce et al. (2010) suggest avoiding these difficulties and the undesirable
warming of the lower stratosphere by directly deploying a sulfuric acid aerosol over a large
area. Unfortunately, the technical challenges of getting large amounts of either sulfur or sulfuric
acid to a height of 20 – 25 km are considerable.
There have been many proposals regarding the technological implementation of a stratospheric
aerosol shield
. One patent filed in 1991 addresses the insertion of aerosols into the stratosphere
(Chang 1991). A more recent patent is for a method that uses commercial aircraft to deploy
reflective aerosols by adding a special additive to their fuel (Hucko 2009).
The Microsoftfunded company Intellectual Ventures has promoted the development of a method called a
“stratoshield”, which uses a balloon to carry a tube from the ground to the stratosphere to deliver
the aerosols, or aerosol generating chemicals, by pumping them through the tube. Keith (2010)
has also proposed to use photophoretic forces to increase the concentration and lifespan of
certain reflective particles in the stratosphere and to reduce their effect on ozone chemistry.
The side-effects of stratospheric aerosol injection have been debated in a number of
publications. Many possible negative effects on the global hydrologic cycle have been deduced
by comparing the proposed stratospheric manipulation with the largest volcanic eruption of
the 20th century, Mt. Pinatubo (Hegerl and Solomon 2009). Simulations by Ricke et al. (2010)
suggest that it is not possible to achieve cooling without changing precipitation patterns.
However, using GCM simulations Irvine et al. (2010) more optimistically suggest that it is
possible to reduce solar radiation with only minimal regional effects on precipitation. Other sideeffects also include those caused by the potentially catalytic acceleration of ozone depletion by
stratospheric particles (Heckendorn et al. 2009). Adding sulfur to the stratosphere would also
increase the acidity of rainfall in the vicinity of the addition. However, according to modeling
studies by Kravitz et al. (2009; 2010) the global effects of acidification would be negligible.
To minimize the negative side-effects of adding these aerosols Ban-Weiss and Caldeira (2010)
and Eliseev et al. (2010) propose that this method can be optimized by evenly distributing the
aerosols across different latitudes. However, not all side-effects are negative; one positive sideeffect is that these methods would increase diffuse solar radiation, which could have a positive
effect on plant productivity (Roderick et al. 2011; Mercado et al. 2009).
Noble

User ID: 1211465
United States
07/18/2012 10:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
There is a program by Rockefeller and his NWO-fellowers for reducement of the global population by some billions(!).
These gays think on a global scale for decades. Chemtrailing is one part of this agenda. Several effects are avieved:
- weakening the vitamin D production of humans throug reducement of natural sunlight.
- poisoning the ground for disturbing the plants abilit to grow.
- poisoning the humans for weakening the immune system and vaccaine the ppl with nano-particles and heavy metals
- creating (influenca) deseases within the population
- creation of a 'stratospheric shild' that can be electromagnetical influenced by Tesla technology. the creation of earthquakes and the manipulation of human brain activity is archieved.

----------------------------------------------------------

29:50 min, History Channel explains Chemtrail technologie



----------------------------------------------------------

pay attention to that paper from BMBF (German Ministry of Education and Research)
[link to www.google.com]

go to 3.2.2, read!!

3.2.2 Aerosols in the stratosphere
In principle, adding reflective sub-micrometer aerosols to the stratosphere is a good method
for reducing SW solar radiation because these aerosols are inexpensive and can have a
significant effect on SW radiation (Budyko 1982). In addition, stratospheric aerosols have
a relatively long lifespan of 1 – 2 years (primarily due to the lack of rainfall) when compared
to those in the troposphere which have a lifespan of lesser than 1 week. The effectiveness of
these aerosols has already been confirmed from observing “natural experiments” in which
major volcanic eruptions caused 1° of global cooling by adding 1 million tons of sulfur (asSO2) to the stratosphere, where it was converted into an aerosol (Lacis and Mishchenko 1995).
This CE technology, which has been the subject of a relatively long-standing debate (Budyko
1982; Dickinson 1996; Teller et al. 1997; Keith 2000), became especially popular owing to the
work of Paul Crutzen (2006) (Wigley 2006; Rasch et al. 2008b). The method has considerable
potential (a reduction of many W/m2) and is in principle effective enough to offset a multiplication
of the pre-industrial CO2 concentration. Modeling studies have supported the effectiveness of
the basic method and discussed it’s possible side-effects (Govindasamy et al. 2003; Rasch et al.
2008a; Murphy 2009; Lenton and Vaughan 2009; Heckendorn et al. 2009; Jones et al. 2010).
However, as Heckendorn et al. (2009) and Pierce et al. (2010) show the method’s effectiveness
does not increase in proportion to the amount of sulfur that is added to the stratosphere. The
initial estimates of amount of sulfur that is required have already been revised upwards (Katz
2010) and the expected stratospheric lifetime of the aerosols revised downwards (Tuck et al.
2008). Although, Pierce et al. (2010) suggest avoiding these difficulties and the undesirable
warming of the lower stratosphere by directly deploying a sulfuric acid aerosol over a large
area. Unfortunately, the technical challenges of getting large amounts of either sulfur or sulfuric
acid to a height of 20 – 25 km are considerable.
There have been many proposals regarding the technological implementation of a stratospheric
aerosol shield
. One patent filed in 1991 addresses the insertion of aerosols into the stratosphere
(Chang 1991). A more recent patent is for a method that uses commercial aircraft to deploy
reflective aerosols by adding a special additive to their fuel (Hucko 2009).
The Microsoftfunded company Intellectual Ventures has promoted the development of a method called a
“stratoshield”, which uses a balloon to carry a tube from the ground to the stratosphere to deliver
the aerosols, or aerosol generating chemicals, by pumping them through the tube. Keith (2010)
has also proposed to use photophoretic forces to increase the concentration and lifespan of
certain reflective particles in the stratosphere and to reduce their effect on ozone chemistry.
The side-effects of stratospheric aerosol injection have been debated in a number of
publications. Many possible negative effects on the global hydrologic cycle have been deduced
by comparing the proposed stratospheric manipulation with the largest volcanic eruption of
the 20th century, Mt. Pinatubo (Hegerl and Solomon 2009). Simulations by Ricke et al. (2010)
suggest that it is not possible to achieve cooling without changing precipitation patterns.
However, using GCM simulations Irvine et al. (2010) more optimistically suggest that it is
possible to reduce solar radiation with only minimal regional effects on precipitation. Other sideeffects also include those caused by the potentially catalytic acceleration of ozone depletion by
stratospheric particles (Heckendorn et al. 2009). Adding sulfur to the stratosphere would also
increase the acidity of rainfall in the vicinity of the addition. However, according to modeling
studies by Kravitz et al. (2009; 2010) the global effects of acidification would be negligible.
To minimize the negative side-effects of adding these aerosols Ban-Weiss and Caldeira (2010)
and Eliseev et al. (2010) propose that this method can be optimized by evenly distributing the
aerosols across different latitudes. However, not all side-effects are negative; one positive sideeffect is that these methods would increase diffuse solar radiation, which could have a positive
effect on plant productivity (Roderick et al. 2011; Mercado et al. 2009).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20004920


And how do you know the trails we all see in the sky have anything to do with any of that? You don't...it's 100% pure speculation based on your paranoid world view...

You are pathetic.

You have no idea if ANY of the ideas/projects/proposals above result in ANY visible trails whatsoever. More than likely, these projects would involve a uniform haze which would be spread over a VERY wide area...and from the ground, the sky would still look VERY blue...with just a hint of white throughout...Not long white streaks that don't break up..and move, intact, over several miles...or even out to sea.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16848679
Germany
07/19/2012 01:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
You have no idea if ANY of the ideas/projects/proposals above result in ANY visible trails whatsoever(tell me more). More than likely, these projects would involve a uniform haze which would be spread over a VERY wide area(indeed)...and from the ground, the sky would still look VERY blue(only VERY!!)...with just a hint of white throughout(just a little)...Not long white streaks that don't break up..and move, intact, over several miles...or even out to sea(exactly).
 Quoting: Noble



Good explaination of the mechanism behind Chemtrailing.
ANHEDONIC

User ID: 16542544
United States
07/19/2012 01:21 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
You have no idea if ANY of the ideas/projects/proposals above result in ANY visible trails whatsoever(tell me more). More than likely, these projects would involve a uniform haze which would be spread over a VERY wide area(indeed)...and from the ground, the sky would still look VERY blue(only VERY!!)...with just a hint of white throughout(just a little)...Not long white streaks that don't break up..and move, intact, over several miles...or even out to sea(exactly).
 Quoting: Noble



Good explaination of the mechanism behind Chemtrailing.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16848679


lmao

"You will not be punished for your anger, you will be punished by your anger"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20068746
Germany
07/19/2012 05:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
bump
Noble

User ID: 1211465
United States
07/19/2012 08:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
You have no idea if ANY of the ideas/projects/proposals above result in ANY visible trails whatsoever(tell me more). More than likely, these projects would involve a uniform haze which would be spread over a VERY wide area(indeed)...and from the ground, the sky would still look VERY blue(only VERY!!)...with just a hint of white throughout(just a little)...Not long white streaks that don't break up..and move, intact, over several miles...or even out to sea(exactly).
 Quoting: Noble



Good explaination of the mechanism behind the paranoid Chemtrailing hoax.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16848679



Thank you.
Favorite Karma:


12/21/2012 "Can you admit you are a shill?"

No, I can't. Because that would be a lie.

Can you admit that you are a gullible loser?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17090286
United States
07/19/2012 08:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)

[link to www.youtube.com]

Recorded on Januar, 12th 2011. Gunderson has been killed by cancer on Juli, 31th 2011.

Now we know, why noble and his fellowers are trying so hard to blame us. They are very dangerous. They really would like to see us dead. By Chemtrails, Cancer or Accident doesn't matter.

Welcome to NWO-Fascism.
Welcome to the End.
 Quoting: Noble=SnakeAirline=nwoshill 20004920




[link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2562242
United States
07/19/2012 08:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
Alarmist scientists at Harvard University have plans to spray thousands of tons of sun-reflecting chemical particles into the earth’s atmosphere to artificially cool the planet.
Over Fort Summer, New Mexico, this solar geoengineering seeks to replicate volcano effects, which shoot sulfates into the stratosphere by using synthetic sulfate aerosols to reflect sunlight back out into space.
In May of this year, a study published in the journal Remote Sensing , co-author Dr. Roy Spencer reported that real data from NASA’s Terra Satellite showed that the earth is naturally expelling heat out into space without the assistance of geoengineering. This empirical data proves that the theories behind geoengineering are bogus and mask another agenda.
David Keith , investigator for the project and president and majority owner of the geoengineering corporation Carbon Engineering (of which gates is a major stakeholder), justifies this engineering of our natural biosphere by saying it is an inexpensive method of slowing down global warming effects. Keith disregards his peers who assert that this action will alter earth’s natural weather patterns while environmental groups decry that geoengineering nullifies their efforts to purport their campaigns to convince the public that man-made climate change is directly causational to human emissions of CO2.
Keith manages the million-dollar geoengineering research that is funded by Bill Gates and the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research. These monies come directly from Gates’ personal funds. Keith himself receives cash from Gates himself, although the amount is undisclosed.
Gates commissioned a previous study with the assistance of a US aerospace corporation who manufactures solar geoengineering technologies.
Gates and the Royal Society were behind the report entitled, Solar Radiation Management and the US Taskforce on Geoengineering which recommend research into how to manage solar radiation.
The UN Convention on Biological Diversity states that they are actively using geoengineering to combat CO2 emissions.
The US government requested over @2 billion for geoengineering research while only spending $100 million of their grant monies.
Keith and his colleague James Anderson will release a balloon over 80,000 feet over New Mexico that will dump tens of hundreds of kilograms of particles to measure the impact of CO2 on the ozone’s chemistry. This data will assist them in creating the right size sulfate aerosols to release into the atmosphere at a later date.
And the justification for this experiment on our planet is that computer models say that it will be beneficial.
Keith hopes to alter the ozone layer by way of future assaults of sulfate aerosols. Keith explains: “The objective is not to alter the climate, but simply to probe the processes at a micro scale. The direct risk is very small.”
Keith simply disregards that he is causing the altering of our very biosphere under the guise of the hoax of man-made global warming.
Solar engineering will directly amplify specific areas of study as the have chosen sulfuric dust the mimics the emissions of volcanoes. An intended consequences of solar geoengineering is the whitening of our skies because of the nano particles being released to reflect sunlight. Sulfate aerosols cause whiter daytime skies and sunset to glow brighter.

Pat Mooney, executive director of the Canadian-based technology watchdog ETC Group, said: “Impacts include the potential for further damage to the ozone layer, and disruption of rainfall, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions – potentially threatening the food supplies of billions of people.
It will do nothing to decrease levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere or halt ocean acidification. And solar geoengineering is likely to increase the risk of climate-related international conflict – given that the modeling to date shows it poses greater risks to the global south.”
Geoengineering, solar radiation management , will cause drought from impeding rainfall by 15% in strategic areas in North America and Northern Eurasia, as well as more than 20% in central South America.
Hassan Mousavi , head of Iran’s cultural heritage and tourism organization, says that he is “suspicious about the drought in the southern part of the country” as a “soft war’ against Iran by Western governments.
Mousavi explains: “The world arrogance and colonist (term used by Iranian authorities to label the West) are influencing Iran’s climate conditions using technology… The drought is an acute issue and soft war is completely evident… This level of drought is not normal.”
Recent escalations of sand storms and extremely dry conditions across Iran have devastated cities. In Iraq, desertification has intensified within the last 2 decades.
In 2011, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad stated at the believed the US government was “causing drought” conditions in Iran and expounded that “European countries are using special equipment to force clouds to dump” their water on their continent.
In 2011, British geo-scientists experimented with a balloon-and-hosepipe device that would have water into the sky. The Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering (SPICE) was funded by the UK government; however theirplans were cancelled because the public in the UK demanded that they stop their experiment. While NOGs controlled the scientists at SPICE and the project was revealed as a false flag attempt to seed the clouds to cause predetermined outcomes in weather patterns. If this experiment had been allowed to continue, there would have been future deployment of more geoengineering technology following the outcome of this beta-test.
Keith, claiming to oppose SPICE, said that the experiment would not have furthered solar geoengineering and effectiveness in controlling weather patterns.
Of course, Keith’s ties to the solar geoengineering industry and his cohort Gates have vested stakes in the use of such technologies. They are actively seeking to alter the very basic chemical elements of our atmosphere; changing it to be more sulfuric and toxic to all life on this planet.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20193501
07/21/2012 02:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
[link to www.fona.de]
www.fona.de/mediathek/pdf/Climate_Engineering_engl.pdf

2.4.4 Argument cluster: Geopolitical objections (AC12)
Geopolitical and military-strategic consequences of the mere fact that CE technologies are ready for deployment form the starting point of further consequentialist objections to T2 (objections which deny that CE technologies should be ready for deployment). The dual use problem, which is also relevant in other technology debates, for example in the nuclear energy controversy, applies to the case of climate engineering as well: [A29 Dual use] CE technologies may, potentially, serve as weapons of mass destruction A 29
Dual use (Keith 2000: 275; Corner and Pidgeon 2010: 30; Goodell 2010: 210ff; Robock 2008a; ETC Group 2009c: 34).

3.2.3 Modification of cirrus clouds
High altitude ice clouds (cirrus clouds) can obstruct either LW or SW radiation. As reviewed by Zhang et al. (1999), the type of radiation that is blocked depends on the latitude of the clouds, their altitude, particle size, and the crystal structure of the ice. Although all of the factors are important, the latitude of the clouds is generally the dominant factor that determines which type of radiation they block. Currently, the composition and location of cirrus clouds causes them to have a warming effect (Lee et al. 2009). However, if they can be artificially dispersed or modified then they can be forced to have a cooling effect. According to a proposal by
Mitchell et al. (2009) this could happen if the sky is sown with certain types of ice nuclei that promote cirrus cloud formation. The presence of these nuclei would result in fewer, but larger ice particles being produced during cirrus cloud formation, thus causing them to sink more rapidly. As a result the lifespan of the clouds and the overall cloud coverage would be reduced. In addition, these nuclei would also change the optical properties of the clouds. One merit of this proposal is the extremely low material cost that would be involved in the Little material is needed to modify deployment of this method. Ice nuclei are only needed in very low quantities and could even be deployed at suitable locations by commercial aircraft with only a few kg of material needed per flight.
The ultimate climatic effect of generating cirrus clouds by injecting ice nuclei into the Distributional effects atmosphere cannot easily be quantified. In particular, research is needed to determine how different injection methods influence the crystal structure of the resulting ice particles. Regardless, Influences of F LW and F SW these methods could be expected to strongly modify both the SW and LW components of the radiation budget. Furthermore, because of the different geographical and spatial factors that effect SW and LW radiation13, this method has the potential to cause large changes in regional climates and hydrological cycles. Thus, this method may conceal particularly dangerous and unknown meteorological side-effects.


also pay attention to the references:

SCOPING REPORT CLIMATE ENGINEERING
References Teller, E.; Hyde, T.; Wood, L. (2002), Active climate stabilization: Practical physics-based approaches to prevention of climate change, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), CA (USA), UCRL-JC-148012. Titz, S. (2011), Kritik der Klimatechnik, Spektrum der Wissenschaft, 2011-01-14, available online at www.spektrum.de/artikel/1060324& _ z=798888, (2011-03-10).
Tuck, A. F.; Donaldson, D. J.; Hitchman, M. H.; Richard, E. C.; Tervahattu, H.; Vaida, V.; Wilson, J. C. (2008), On geoengineering with sulphate aerosols in the tropical upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Climatic Change, 90, 315 – 331. Twomey, S. (1974), Pollution and the planetary albedo, Atmospheric Environment, 8, 1251 – 1256. International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change, Climatic Change, 95, 103 – 119. Volk, T.; Hoffert, M. I. (1985), Ocean carbon pumps: Analysis of relative strengths and efficiencies in ocean-driven atmospheric CO2 changes. In: Sundquist, E.; Broecker, W. (eds.): The carbon cycle and atmospheric CO2: Natural variations, archean to present, American Geophysical Union (Geophysical Monograph, 32), Washington D.C., 99 – 110. Wakefield, S. R. (2008), A dustor particle-based solar shield to counteract global warming, Patent in the UK. Wallace, D. W. R.; Law, C. S.; Boyd, P. W.; Collos, Y.; Croot, P.; Denman, K.; Lam, P. J.; Riebesell, U.; Takeda, S.; Williamson, P. (2010), Ocean fertilization: A scientific summary for policy makers, IOC/UNESCO, Paris, IOC/BRO/2010/2. SCOPING REPORT CLIMATE ENGINEERING
References Warburton, J. A.; Young, L. G.; Stone, R. H. (1995), Assessment of seeding effects in snowpack augmentation programs: Ice nucleation and scavenging of seeding aerosols,
Robock, A. (2008a), 20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea, Bulletin of the Atomic ­Scientists, 64, 14 – 18. Robock, A. (2008b), Atmospheric science: Whither geoengineering? Science, 320, 1166 – 1167. Robock, A. (2009), A biased economic analysis of geoengineering, available online at www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/08/a-biased-econo​mic-analysis-of-geoengineering/,
(2008a), An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols,
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 4007 – 4037. Rasch, P. J.; Latham, J.; Chen, C. C. (2009), Geoengineering by cloud seeding: influence on sea ice and climate system, Environmental Research Letters, 4, 1 – 8. Rasch, P. J.; Crutzen, P. J.; Coleman, D. B. (2008b),
Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: The role of particle size, Geophysical Research Letters, 35, doi:10.1029/2007GL032179. Rau, G. H. (2008), Electrochemical splitting of calcium carbonate to increase solution alkalinity: Implications for mitigation of carbon dioxide and ocean acidity, Environmental Science and Technology, 8935 – 8940, doi:10.1021/es800366q. Rau, G. H.; Caldeira, K. (1999), Enhanced carbonate dissolution: A means of sequestering waste CO2 as ocean bicarbonate, Energy Conversion and Management, 40, 1803 – 1813.
Michelsen, G.; Simonis, U. E.; Weizsäcker, E. U. (eds.): Jahrbuch Ökologie 2011, Hirzel, Stuttgart. Parr, D. (2008), Geo-engineering is no solution to climate change, guardian.co.uk, (2008-09-01), available online at www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/sep/01/climatechange.
Messina, S. (2010), Die Welt will noch kein Geoengineering, available online at www.klimaretter.info/forschung/hintergrund/7217-die-welt-will​-noch-kein-geoengineering,
Krämer, A. (2010), Schöner Leben im Labor? Geo-Engineering und das Recht, die Welt zu verändern, Internationale Politik, 65, 70 – 75. Kravitz, B.; Robock, A.; Oman, L.; Stenchikov, G. L.; Marquardt, A. (2009), Acid deposition from stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate aerosols, Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, doi:10.1029/2009JD011918. Kravitz, B.; Robock, A.; Oman, L.; Stenchikov, G. L.; Marquardt, A. (2010), Correction to “Acid deposition from stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate aerosols”, Journal of Geophysical Research,
Keith, D. W. (2009), Why capture CO2 from the atmosphere? Science, 325, 1654 – 1655. Keith, D. W. (2010), Photophoretic levitation of engineered aerosols for geoengineering, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 16428 – 16431.
Green Action Group (2010), Nicht mehr weg sehen! Geoengineering und Aerosol Verbrechen! Available online at www.greenaction.de/kampagne/stop-geoengineering-and-aerosolve​rbrechen, (2011-03-10).
References Brovkin, V.; Petoukhov, V.; Claussen, M.; Bauer, E.; Archer, D.; Jaeger, C. (2009), Geoengineering climate by stratospheric sulfur injections: Earth system vulnerability to technological failure,
Chang, D. B. (1991), Stratospheric welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming, Patent in the USA.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19973059
Netherlands
07/21/2012 02:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
Liar.
 Quoting: Noble


You are as ignorant as you are pathetic... suicide
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20193501
07/21/2012 03:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
Liar.
 Quoting: Noble


You are as ignorant as you are pathetic... suicide
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19973059


And his Brother is his Father too.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20199349
United Kingdom
07/21/2012 04:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chemtrails confirmed by Ted Gunderson (RIP)
.
 Quoting: Noble


Liar.


We all think you have just been caught to be the liar.

Again.

As usual.


"Yea this is just my hobby but EVERY single thread that mentions this stuff me or snake are here just doing our hobby just following our hobby I am in to atmospheric pressure it's my hobby it's a hobby to be a mean bastard its my hobby to be here no matter the time one of us are here covering chemtrails cause cause ITS OUR HOBBY and we must reply we must get the last word in so it looks to the viewer that we are right that what we have said is the last thing they read so it sinks in, its my hobby and I am not going to change my story, cause it's a hobby.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!