X Marks the Spot

:)

Good night lovesong.

Sweet dreams.

i had not noticed until you just posted
it did not
i said that from my experience and belief since being material and i have never said it before and i possessed no pts in telling it
in fact i felt happy to know it to tell it

oddly though
now i`m prompted to say that i think pts and fears arise and i begin to feel melancholy
yuck

okay
well , that stops when i click back into now mode and i fall into my emotional state in the present

hmmm
clever topic

Last Edited by aether on 01/27/2013 11:12 PM

There is something you did which I associate with your potential discomfort with a topic in regards to myself.

Perhaps I was mistaken. It could be unconscious. But I always notice it when it happens. Due to being rare...



Do you remember on SS's archetype thread when I asked you who 'observation' was?



:)

Last Edited by Seer777 on 01/27/2013 11:18 PM

Must be that fox between the bull and the crane ;p

I nearly posted this image a bit earlier...



:)

good night all I still have some sort of exchange happening between my hands and the computer.. will check in tomorrow

Much Love and Aware Dreams to all , May the universe speak to you in your sleep :)

good night

my bedtime to

nn everyone

It was new-to-me at the time. As I had just spoken those words and to see them quoted by someone named 'observation' to my sense, confused me.

It was completely novel, and it called into question for a moment what I believed. I thought perhaps I had read it else where. Or perhaps that someone else had received the same words.

Due to the speed of synch I was routinely experiencing at the time, this was not out of the realm of perceived possible, so after a bit of pondering I decided to ask.

Do you remember what I said, that you quoted as 'observation'?

Do you remember what you said to me some days or weeks later regarding?

I have never forgotten it, and I take it as a personal cue now.



Look the point is this...

We are often greeted on this thread, or others, or elsewhere with situation which cause us discomfort. Some are sensitive to the cues of others, picking up their discomfort and altering their behavior to accommodate.

Others are not...


For example, when jigsaw was asking for people to sign in, to 'show themselves'...it was refused.

Why this refusal of submission to a request?

The discomfort level outweighed the potential benefit of doing said.

The topic was quickly disregarded as a dead-end through the refusal of submission to said.


Submission works on many levels. And I wanted to broach the issue in a way that was a bit shocking.

I hope the 'points' are just as glaring.



Last Edited by Seer777 on 01/27/2013 11:40 PM

points well made

i don`t remember and would like to be reminded

Last Edited by aether on 01/27/2013 11:44 PM

although i am remembering now
when i realized why you were asking i did "lock onto" a point which to me matched much more about you then you were telling but was telling me it was points you wished to proceed through

Last Edited by aether on 01/27/2013 11:48 PM

Here it is...






:)

:)

I have been thinking of the vortex thread, and that page all day...


This joke in particular.




And what happened directly after. I was pensing on it for quite sometime today. Perhaps I should ask what I was considering after all...



Last Edited by Seer777 on 01/27/2013 11:56 PM

i will sleep well tonight

nn

The Beauty of the Simple...




Last Edited by Spirit666 on 01/28/2013 12:25 AM

Thread: UPDATE: A SIGN?? Pope's dove of peace attacked seconds after release!





I find this poignant and a bit humorous...

It is not the first time the Pope's prayers have not protected his birds of peace. Last year the two doves he released turned tail and flew straight back in through the open window.


humorous? quite the opposite I feel...his prayers are tainted...as has been the previous ones before him...

Well, humorous as most would view the word 'ironic'.

However, that word is oft met with misinterpretation.


When you look at the Pope...how does he make you feel?

I realize ironic...and different interpretations..mis or not...

I don't trust the dude lol goodnight Seer...

I agree.

His eyes certainly do not call for Trust. As they hide the shiver they invoke...

Good night.

:)

I came in tonight to catch up, confused about submission being glorified, lol. Those dominance/submission scripts seem like burdens on both ends, to me anyway, scripts to break rather than buy. Like relics of a broken system. Why do we need that anymore? Why choose to take from or give power to another? But then I'm not one for hierarchy, I guess I'm trying to understand the POV of those who are. Note, this is something that I've tried to understand my entire life... why this is so prevalent in the world. Maybe I'm the weird one for feeling no kinship with these concepts, being far more comfortable with equal exchange where no one feels the need to dominate or to submit. Or maybe I'm just a dreamer, lol.

Goodmorning.
No offence to cj (my nephew named cj I named him :)

But I sense the manic, to me it feels like a build of energy that has been building within and as seer said the floor was given, that energy has poured out in the words, the build can make one manic, the excitement of release is like shaking a bottle of fizzy pop. Age is but a number growth through actions is a better judgement of character IMHO.

Carry on.

Oh how refreshing it is to read this thread...

Good morning everyone

good morning beau
you are not weird


off line conversation several hours before your post

this will become more noticeable as our linear years progress
if we take this thread as example we attempt to match what was told in our past to match what we know in the present by our own discovery

we do this because what we knew in our past lead us into believing in a universe we recently discovered never existed

if what we believed in our past took us to a universe that never existed we may believe it is unlikely many of our translations of our past were true

because all of our languages originate from our past all of our languages meanings are understood in the non existing universe manner they were formed within
how could they not
thus the languages we formed to complement our universes being expressed by our emotional expression (life) are wrong

the good news is we always emotional express ourselves as we do
structure and function can never be separated
thus it is not us that requires to alter, we do not
it is the information we feed on to maintain our emotional expression that requires to change into shape that fits our own shape thus we function (live) as our structure and golden aged memory demands

we are not a design fault
our languages are

Last Edited by aether on 01/28/2013 06:53 AM

and we can never underestimate the power in word
not because of what our history says about word
what we know today says about word

in our language are the synergy guide words that without thought match the accumulation emotions through linear time of our ancestral emotions and current emotions within our earth fields
thus
if you wish to feel "in tune with others" start talking about a popular synergy guide in word and you feel the field emotions of others immediately
and you are, it a real feeling
from there you go with the general emotional theme in the fields that was placed there by others before you
and maintained by others, like yourself, in our present
natural and normal
as we may see all of our processes are information sensitive and our fields are no exception
nothing we did not know /z\

this is how and why animals taught in london to do something new to them takes x amount of linear time
from the moment those animals know what to do because they like doing it
all animals from that moment of the london animals knowing of that type (structure) no matter their location on earth, take progressively shorter and shorter linear time to know the same thing once it has been leaned by some of their type within our field , our field transmits it to others of their design upon demand

functions the same with plants and everything

Last Edited by aether on 01/28/2013 07:08 AM

but then we must remember that "nature" utilizes transitory process unaffected by linear time

transitory expression

this means that everything is motivated (designed) within it`s structure , both materially and non materially , to come and go, never at the same time
thus there is always somewhere to be something within
but
all somewhere to be something within must cease to be what they were being something within
at some moment in linear time
but
never all somethings and all something to be something within, at the same time cease being something

thus the only constant
is
there is always something to be something within

because this constant exists, it possess structure, it functions
and
for a person it means there is a constant they can be constant within

is it the synergy of the 2 that is the constant
or
is it the 2 that are constant thus the synergy is constant too

as there is no beginning in eternal, the relationship between the 2 and their synergy may be looked at in this manner

everything that exists (sequence/direction of information/emotion) as a consequence (sequential) of the 2 and their synergy existence
is transitory in expression
thus
we may see there is motive in the design because it need never be transitory by design

it is motivated to be so thus is

the reason for this /z\ is readily understood in new language of new discovery design

does it fit old language of universe that never existed design

it feels as i write that the reason the old language exists is to know the reason for the design
which
is good because it feels the old language contains the knowing there is more to know concerning the design

Last Edited by aether on 01/28/2013 07:42 AM