X Marks the Spot

i don`t think so
what buddha wanted was domination of the eye in the sky by unemotional means as in:
no matter what the eye or anything else does it will never be as buddha is because buddha has emotional control of self to control all emotion not of it`self origin

not universally popular but buddha could never know that being surface of planet bound

attention pulled towards Netherlands

so does that mean he was free from indras net?

remembering that local traditional sees perfection static

everything that could be has been thus is perfectly known
thus perfected
thus perfection

this is not conscious process

conscious processes is velocity and feedback
conscious process is always quicker than what it is conscious of
that which is conscious process is structured (exists)
thus perfection is the quickest structure of all things
it knows what can never occur because it is to quick for what will never occur to occur
knowing what will never occur makes not knowing what may occur the motive for being
this is perfection

mechanical universe ?

Thread: This is what a 9.0 earthquake look like!



O.o

OK, I am viewing Indra's Net as something different than aether.

I will have to look deeper and see where the discrepancies are arising.

No, we are viewing it the same.

My answer concerning Buddha 'escaping' Indra's Net was wrong. I isolated the net as a type of singularity resting in the between place of non-material and material, which is wrong.

There is no escaping Indra's Net as it is within and without everything.

Why did I see that 'vision' that way? I think I was viewing it as a form of karma or something. Oh, I know why. Indra's Net is within/without everything, but it has a structure/function that shapes the material as it is birthed from non-material. That is where I isolated the concept. I didn't pull my vision out further to get the broader view. Instead, I hovered around the structure/function of the net as it relates to forming the material.

we know what he was looking for

he was looking for that place that disconnects from reality to enable reality to be viewed from an unreal location to enable understanding of reality


we think he got carried away with the notion of inversion
he said
reality does exist thus unreality must exist also
for him it was simple
enter unreality and reality is observable without it contaminating your understanding of it by being immersed within it
thus the quest for unreality become reality

you where spot on
you got buddha in one

have you a feeling it is a good time to remind us of that scale quake in japan as you notice what you do

I was wondering the very same before I posted it.




Pardon my delay, I was having breakfast.

I am happy to say, my appetite has returned again.

The Buddha is an action existing in all states and places. An opening doorway. It's action up to you, but the pattern continues with further awareness until only the action is left with no pinion of individuation. As that is an effect not the whole.

It is a patterning not a person.

No mind=no memory=pure reaction, not the entrapping echoes of sphere transitioning to yet another sphere.


What is the action==pure conciousness (that which is not wrapped by bias of material and perspective.

good about the apatite
i asked because season is applicable in our southern hemisphere
and were one to occur we have just entered the season for one to occur

No mind=no memory=pure reaction, not the entrapping echoes of sphere transitioning to yet another sphere.

although that looks odd
always something in something to be something
and fractal is our universe eternal memory

i think we have some bits missing

Let us hope is doesn't.

2004, 2010, 2011 being the timing between devastating quakes.

I don't know why but this reminded me of peter pan and the lost boys

Is attraction conscious? Or is it just IS?


Lol...I just found this smilie fishing...

Also reminds me of Osiris and Isis being Wendy? Idk tho

No, we are viewing it the same.

My answer concerning Buddha 'escaping' Indra's Net was wrong. I isolated the net as a type of singularity resting in the between place of non-material and material, which is wrong.

There is no escaping Indra's Net as it is within and without everything.

Why did I see that 'vision' that way? I think I was viewing it as a form of karma or something. Oh, I know why. Indra's Net is within/without everything, but it has a structure/function that shapes the material as it is birthed from non-material. That is where I isolated the concept. I didn't pull my vision out further to get the broader view. Instead, I hovered around the structure/function of the net as it relates to forming the material.

Good Afternoon Spirit.

Exquisite timing...


[link to www.youtube.com]

:)

The Buddha is an action existing in all states and places. An opening doorway. It's action up to you, but the pattern continues with further awareness until only the action is left with no pinion of individuation. As that is an effect not the whole.

It is a patterning not a person.

No mind=no memory=pure reaction, not the entrapping echoes of sphere transitioning to yet another sphere.


What is the action==pure consciousness (that which is not wrapped by bias of material and perspective.

This sutra is known for its extensive instruction on the concept and usage of skillful means – (Sanskrit: up ya, Japanese: hben), the seventh paramita or perfection of a Bodhisattva – mostly in the form of parables. It is also one of the first sutras to use the term Mahna, or "Great Vehicle", Buddhism. Another concept introduced by the Lotus Sutra is the idea that the Buddha is an eternal entity, who achieved nirvana eons ago, but willingly chose to remain in the cycle of rebirth (samsara) to help teach beings the Dharma time and again. He reveals himself as the "father" of all beings and evinces the loving care of just such a father. Moreover, the sutra indicates that even after the Parinirvana (apparent physical death) of a Buddha, that Buddha continues to be real and to be capable of communicating with the world.