X Marks the Spot

Beyond Earth's protective atmosphere and extending all the way through interplanetary space, electrified particles dominate the scene. Indeed, 99% of the universe is made of this electrified gas, known as plasma.

Consciousness


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

no one knows!

Conciousness isn't solely awareness. It is Awareness of awareness, giving object(ive) distance.

Thus epigenetic cultural and artistic practice can be transferred in the framework as that which is known as knowledge.

That's because the soap bubble is composed of atoms and atoms spin. The parts of the atom all posses charge, the charges moving in relation to one another creates magnetic moments in the particle. The magnetic moments further enhances the charge by magnetic induction, which enhances the magnetic field. All motions and almost all forms are spiral in shape, or are made up of spiral shapes.

[link to farside.ph.utexas.edu]

its the nature of charged particles to follow a spiral because nothing is stationary.

so that means within a soap bubble we experience/observe the sequences of our sub atomic domain in a manner that makes sense

You don't reackon the GOD intended some to know and teach and some to learn to know...do ya?

You don't reackon the GOD intended some to know and teach and some to learn to know...do ya?

Synergy is two or more things functioning together to produce a result not independently obtainable

The bubble only exists as long as the pressure externally (think density, complexity) is greater then within (in the case of water as media); Otherwise it flows. Within Air , it is the tensile strength of the bubble separating like from like (momentarily).

Both are models of conciousness and forms function.

Ever since 1950, ‘Velikovsky’ has been a household name, associated with a set of adventurous but highly unorthodox claims that remain contested today.

In his writings, Immanuel Velikovsky documented his ideas with copious references, but gave the impression that the ideas themselves were the spontaneous fruits of his own creative mind. As it happens, however, almost every generation since the Enlightenment had its own ‘Velikovsky’, advancing remarkably similar ideas. This is true to the extent that virtually none of Velikovsky’s core hypotheses were original.

Who were these earlier ‘Velikovskys’?

In 1655, the French lawyer and theologian Isaac de la Peyrère (1596-1676) departed from Christian consensus with his ‘pre-Adamite’ thesis. Taking a cue from earlier Jewish discourse, de la Peyrère reasoned that a race of humans had existed long before Adam and the ‘creation of the world’ as narrated in Genesis really concerned only the latest episode in a continuous cycle of cosmic destruction and creation. Velikovsky opened Worlds in Collision with a discussion of such ‘world ages’ and wrote a chapter entitled ‘The Pre-Adamite Age’ that remains unpublished today.

In the 1680s, the English theologian Thomas Burnet (c. 1635? – 1715) argued that the earth’s rotational axis had originally been perpendicular to the ecliptic plane, producing a uniform season and climate on earth, until the deluge precipitated the tilting of the axis: ‘… the Position of the primæval Earth was strait, its Axis being always placed and retained in a parallel Line to the Axis of the Ecliptick, whence all the Motions of the Heavens were uniform, and the Course of the Year was pure and unmixed, without Differences of Seasons’. Changes in the inclination of the earth’s rotational axis were a staple of Velikovsky’s theories.............................

René Descartes ( March 1596 – 11 February 1650) was a French philosopher, mathematician, and writer who spent most of his adult life in the Dutch Republic. He has been dubbed the 'Father of Modern Philosophy', and much subsequent Western philosophy is a response to his writings, which are studied closely to this day

On the night of 10–11 November 1619, while stationed in Neuburg an der Donau, Germany, Descartes experienced a series of three powerful dreams or visions that he later claimed profoundly influenced his life. He concluded from these visions that the pursuit of science would prove to be, for him, the pursuit of true wisdom and a central part of his life's work. Descartes also saw very clearly that all truths were linked with one another, so that finding a fundamental truth and proceeding with logic would open the way to all science. This basic truth, Descartes found quite soon: his famous "I think".

morning blue

it seems to work like this
the memory of our past existence can and does never go away for two reasons
1) it is within the memory of our dna, that which we once were
2) it is within the memory of our environments, new to us by discovery, fields

since the era of the memory/events anyone whom was prompted to remember had no information within the society they relived the memory to confirm what they were remembering was real
so without exception the remembering individual was classified as an anomaly of no consequence no matter if it was a beggar or a king whom experienced it
there simply was nothing in either religious or scientific knowing to support the possibility

with the discovery of electricity 150 years ago and the subsequent advances in our sciences pushing to discover the truth in complexity the newly forming knowing of the nature of our universe points more and more to how and why our memories of this catastrophic era are true

as more evidence is made public of the new electrical/magnetic nature of our universe more and more people experience "triggers" of this ingrained memory within us all
and
because the information we possess today provides physical explanation of why those memories are true more and more people are attracted to this information because it satisfies an intuitive sensation of desiring to know

i don`t think it was possible to define consciousness before the law changed on environment information

prior to law change all we possessed to define consciousness was incoming sensation
light via eyes
sound via ears
touch via skin
so
we were forced to accept that everything came into our body from outside because we were allowed to know light and sound traveled through air, in the case of sound and what we were told was a vacuum, in the case of light
therefore everything we called consciousness must materialize inside our body/head
we were even told to doubt there was really anything outside of us and hinted at the whole experience is an allusion
both us and "it" that comes in

now the law has changed we have mediums that are everywhere of electrical/magnetic nature
and
we are allowed to utilize fields in our description
so for the first time we can consider that we ourselves "reach out" to detect real (not illusion) objects, objects that are really there
so
consciousness, just like our auras which are now legal to possess, can be shown to exist outside of our bodies
this is why when we look at the back of someone
they mostly notice
our consciousness has effect outside of our bodies

if our ability to feel is our ability to detect a weak magnetic field
which it is
and
our universe is now legally



anyone want to guess how far we feel instant/distance?

The bacterium is able to detect a chemical gradient not by monitoring a difference in concentration in head and tail but rather by a temporal sensing mechanism keeping track of concentration through time and space

In other words, bacteria like E. coli use temporal sensing to decide whether their situation is improving or not.

Good morning aether.

Simpler, yes. Until you start trying to explain it to people. lmao I thought it would be easy, until I started explaining things to my brother and father. It was so easy for me to see, but they could not see it the way I was.