X Marks the Spot

After all, this 'woo woo' stuff, is not for the feint of heart.

:)

Youre probably not going to believe this. but it's the third time it's happened.

I was speaking to you on Saturday and a picture of Ein Sof fell from my wall. No big deal. I put the picture back up. Then a little later I was speaking to you again and the same picture fell, this time the frame broke and chipped the floorboard trim. Now I'm thinking, OK what is this trying to tell me. So I went out and replaced the frame and rehung the picture. Forgot all about until right now, I scrolled down to see what was going on, I see your avatar and this time a picture of Keter falls to the ground and breaks. Three times now. I promise you, I will not bother you again.

seer, we are supposed to talk.

I thought I was done here but I guess not yet, lol

This is Fancy

About stories I'm always like just tell me the ending already and THEN fill in all the details!

I lied, don't trust me! the picture story is true though.

I read the last page of every book, within about the first 100 pages of reading. No self control :/

But it's funny because I never feel disappointed, like I've spoiled the ending.

The forum is on xanax or something.

I read the last page of every book, within about the first 100 pages of reading. No self control :/

But it's funny because I never feel disappointed, like I've spoiled the ending.

Neptune is the Solar System’s most remote planet. What drives its extraordinary winds?

The winds on Jupiter average about 400 kilometers per hour, with the fastest streaming around the Great Red Spot at 635 kilometers per hour. On Saturn, wind speeds up to 1800 kilometers per hour have been clocked by the orbiting Cassini spacecraft, while Hubble Space Telescope observations of Uranus show the cloud bands blowing at 900 kilometers per hour. On Neptune, a place so cold that nitrogen, oxygen, and argon could freeze into solids, winds around the Great Dark Spot are moving at almost 2000 kilometers per hour.

According to conventional theories, planetary winds are caused by convention: cold air flowing into regions of warm air. That convection is thought to be from solar energy selectively heating different atmospheric regions, causing gases to rise and fall. Why is it that the planets receiving the least solar energy experience the greatest convection? On Neptune, for instance, the Sun is 900 times dimmer than seen on Earth, yet the average winds on our planet are a mere 56 kilometers per hour. The fastest wind was recorded on December 17, 1997: 378 kilometers per hour on the island of Guam.

It seems illogical that the initiator of Neptune’s wind speed is presumed to be the Sun heating a gas giant planet 49,500 kilometers in diameter from 4.486 X 10^6 kilometers away. Presumption would seem to require something more like amazement that such a tiny pinpoint of light in space—little more than a bright star from Neptune’s perspective—could stimulate this large effect..................

Just remember though - the 'voltage barrier' is a barrier only for positive charges. It has no effect on uncharged particles no matter what their mass or velocities are. ...

That is, a voltage will have one effect on positive charges (they feel a force in one direction), another effect on negative charges (they feel a force in the opposite direction), and NO effect on neutral charges (a billion positive charges feel a force one way, a billion negative charges feel a force the opposite way and the 'net' force sums to '0'?). So, if Voyager is net neutral (equal numbers of positive and negative charges, all told), it wouldn't feel a net force from the hypothetical electron shell / voltage barrier, thus while +ions may be stopped dead, or electrons accelerated, Voyager continues on its merry way none the wiser? So, maybe that tells us that Voyager's net charge, if any, is relatively minor? Enough to perhaps account for some tiny deceleration (anomalous negative acceleration toward Sun, vis a vis "Pioneer anomaly"
[link to www.holoscience.com] but not much more...

Very interesting

One trouble I have with this and some discussion is that the plot shown of Voyager 1 data is particles greater than 500 keV / nucleon. This is not solar wind, these are cosmic rays. Solar wind has closer to 1keV/nucleon. Hardly "low-energy particles, which probably originated from the sun."..
Am I missing something?

it is as in walking you may look at the horizon
without losing the sense of the path

I agree with everything you say for the most part, or at least I don't disagree with it in that individually human beings only have a purpose of their own creation.

However I have taken a keen interest in the subject of plasma based life-forms that are basically natural "AI" that forms due to the often cellular and energetic nature of plasma's.

I do not believe we individually have a purpose for our life's, however as a collective the human race does have a purpose within the natural order of the universe.

Nature doesn't create anything that isn't necessary for some form or function of maintaining balance in the universe, even small parasites are of use at limiting the population of larger parasites that could do far more damage and throw the balance off.

It isn't necessary for us to understand our purpose in life, and the question of whether that plasma based life also has consciousness does come into play and supports my personal views of 'universal consciousness'.

Basically my views are closest to the Thelemic principle of True Will - the universe does know what is best for you and will give you signs and help when you are doing what you are supposed to be doing.

But if you aren't doing what you are supposed to be doing you'll be crapped on by the universe/karma until you do bring your life into alignment with that greater purpose.

To a great extent I'm sure professor Tiller's work on the 'New Physics' of subtle energies plays into this with conscious imprinting and such.

It is up to you to find that purpose for yourself and then work towards achieving it as best you can, and if it is 'meant to be' than you will find that things will happen along your way that could greatly assist you, or hinder you if ignored/overlooked.

I have personal experience with this to some extent, to be honest my mind is still trying to come to terms with all the blatant signs and strange coincidences that have been happening lately regarding a certain decision I've been trying to come to for a long time now.

At this point I think I'm fighting that decision just because all the signs and coincidences have been tripping me out so bad, haha.

2 weeks ago I asked for a sign so blatant I couldn't deny it and 10 seconds later I saw something(meteor, ufo, plasma-based craft, or whatever) streak across the night sky and seemingly explode in a small but incredible bluish discharge with even what seemed like small clouds of plasma visible for a split second, and I've spent the last 2 weeks trying to come up with ways to deny it and dismiss it as coincidence that it happened right then.

Like all the other signs, I'd rather find reason to disbelieve than actually follow the signs, and I do believe in this stuff.

Perhaps the universe doesn't do coincidences, but finding your purpose and then achieving it is not always easy even if you think you know what you are doing.

So do you think that some part of you knew that in ten seconds this event would transpire, and so that part of you caused you to think of asking for a sign. This seems the most likely scenario to me. But when we follow this idea a series of conclusions occur.

There is part of you that can see a short distance into the future. This part of you can produce a thought. If it can produce a thought then it can produce physical action, which is the outcome of firing brain cells just like thought is the outcome of firing brain cells. Suely, then, you can see bad events before they happen. So why do you not get the thought and physical action to avoid the bad events.

Much of our actions come from obvious mental processes, but now we have action arising from some part that is beyond those obvious physical processes, and beyond time. It is to be noted that experiencing responds to brain cell firing and so has the chance to produce such brain cell firing, and therefore experiencing is a strong candidate to be that part of us that produced the thought asking for a sign.

Now, of course, we are just starting on a course covered by the greatest philosophers. But to consider that we are dual in nature is fraught with psychological difficulties. However, even the bible has Jesus and Christ as a duality, where Christ can be considered equivalent to experiencing. It is the biggest subject.

You bring up some very interesting lines of thought and exploration, I'll have to address your thoughts more thoroughly when I have more time.

For now on the issue of whether or not part of me could have known or had precognitive nuances to indicate that such a sign would occur shortly there after I personally believe it is a little bit of both - my thinking influences the 'universal consciousness' to a relatively small extent, and the 'universal consciousness' itself being interconnected with my consciousness alerted my subconscious mind or some part of me to the event that was about to occur.

That does bring up a very interesting question though - if it does work as such how far can one's "inner self"(for lack of better term at the moment) see into the future?

A past sign that stuck with me was a shooting star I witnessed about 5 seconds after someone connected to this decision I am trying to make left the camp fire we were having.

It was the first shooting star I had ever seen in my life, with probably hundreds of hours spent searching the night skies for them over 25 years or so(my siblings saw many while camping as kids but I never saw one and it had been a mission of mine for my whole life).

And it happened about 3 hours after I was thinking about the best case scenario for if I made the decision the way my "inner self"/'True Will' seems to be pushing me - and I scrubbed those thoughts from my head with "there's as much chance of that happening as me seeing a shooting star in my life time".

Is it possible my "inner self" could have been alerted to such an event several hours in advance?

Or did my thinking of that somehow trigger a series of events at some subtle energy level that altered the universe itself to put that shooting star straight in my line of vision at that exact perfect moment?

I didn't ask for that sign, it smacked me in the face unexpectedly at a time when I was being quite cynical of these belief's I hold and having some serious doubts, so I doubt I did anything to influence it and was likely just being influenced by it myself.

I have always had lots of so called "de-ja vu" experiences so maybe there is something that I'm more in-tuned with these days within me, my "inner self" or True Will.

I will definitely have to get into this discussion more intently when I have more time, thank you for that reply and I'll respond more directly shortly.

The forum is on xanax or something.

I can't speak for the rest of you...but I am!

Afternoon aether.

"I realized then that there must be a field theory of mind as well. This got me interested in learning memory ,behavior, consciousness , so i started as a biologist moving out from a field theory of developmental biology to a field theory of mind.
That led me to an interest in testing this and there are various ways you can test this theory. Morphic resonance is part of my theory , the idea there is a memory in nature.

That means that if rats learn a "new trick" in one place , rats elsewhere in the world should learn it quicker.
That can be tested with animals and with people"

Makes me think of 'places of power'. Water holes and spirit catchers.

Going out to the middle of nowhere and building a fire. Sitting calmly in silence. Suddenly clinching the stomach and shouting with an adrenaline rush. Then just as suddenly wrapping oneself in silence again and waiting.

That's the most effective way to call an ally. One has to demonstrate control and by doing so infer impeccable intent.

which means introducing the processes "events awaiting to happen" information into the enhancing process geographical locations (sacred sites) and dominant enhancing process people archetypes, within earths magnetosphere = forming our future for all people

which is what is occurring

Environmental Energy - the Discovery of a new physical Truth: there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment.

Morning!

which means introducing the processes "events awaiting to happen" information into the enhancing process geographical locations (sacred sites) and dominant enhancing process people archetypes, within earths magnetosphere = forming our future for all people

which is what is occurring

And what makes one person more 'susceptible' to the exterior influence than others? Would it be more from a specific conscious state of mind, or is it something more 'physical' in as far as brain/antenna physical make-up?

Morning!