X Marks the Spot

i disagree. that is the perspective of a few who dwell within this place. However, that is not the majority. The percentage of those who view glp comparatively to the greater world population is that of less then ½ percent. the percentage of those who dwell within the whole earth that maintain that perspective is smaller perportionate to the majority.



Judgment is in the eye of the beholder.

The Aramaic term for forgiveness is shbag.
Shbag is defined as “to unlock or unhinge your mind.”


the core of christiantity is grace is greater then judgement. In grace there is no victim and because there is no judgement.

0

does dna itself think?

Seer I honestly possess few ulterior motives, I'm only interested in exploring and enjoying myself. I do have favorites although the feelings are not always mutual.

Linear time

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

tricky topic

Excellent.

Then you find yourself in perfect company.

:)

DNA has only one need and that is to replicate. I imagine if that need were threaten it would follow the rule of survival of the most adaptive.

Dually noted. ;)

it is just more efficient for me to address multiple personality’s simultaneously as a whole. as the the whole is the enviroment. so i waist not my words on percieved sectors.

As that is the natural state of logos and the way of things to come as many are seeing that they do the same.

i have to review my own words on multiple occasions because they speak to me as well.


0

I don't know, most don't find my definition of enjoyable to their liking!

Each step you take you create a new place for you to step on, sort of.. ?

To me, if you place the blame of misfortune on something outside yourself, then you are giving up the power to do something about it. If you play the victim, you are disempowering the self and are instead relying on something outside yourself to fix it, instead of relying on the self to fix it and grow from it.

I'm jumping around a bit in this brief post, but it is explained in full at the link.

too funny , when I read this I got a vision of a road falling in front of a man walking and it was based on the decisions he was making. It would fractalize in some places and in other places it remained true to form and was a steady path ... interesting

But, I would imagine you would disagree being christian, as we are born with original sin, so immediately upon birth, it is something from outside the self that is to blame.

gallego I trend likely in most circumstances until its time not to.

I see a baby sleeping on a boat being guided by a child. Once the baby grows it becomes and fulfill the child. Now the child sits and let him/herself be guided by an adult..

Yes.

I understand as I do the very same. And have run into issues a few times when they who I quoted, felt like I was patronizing them when in fact I was just flowing with what came through being more generalized.

The simple or the complex builds upon itself.

There seems to be a starting point, when the wave begins to rise.


A bit like releasing the the pinball on to the table.

Where's it going?


"Plays by sense of smell..."

it in and of itself is nothing but a "blue" print. it is the logical part of the term biological.

the "blue" print is designed to filimented by the soul.

however, the biological body is not all there is.

I believe we live to overcome an inherited nature . If we were born perfect, would life have meaning?

i noticed. :)

you are not responsible for anyone’s feelings. Their feelings are their own. Let go of that and you will flow more.

anyone who try's to hold you accountable for their own feelings is asking you for permission to be a victim at your expense..

through an inability to accept personal responsibility for their own dilemma, they are actually creating it.


have a good day.

i have to see about a few things.

0

So what about a child's innocence?

If behavior is learned and the innocence of children is inherently obvious, doesn't the observed trend run directly against everything you are implying above?

please see my post to seer as an example to seer about posting to multiple simultaneously. As I was responding to here and you at the same time as well as a few others. Efficiently.

I would also ask you this, are you all there is? You know the answer to that.

are you your brothers keeper?

Our DNA dictate a general form. The soul is not limited by it's vehicle. Hence a physical evolution, an intellectual evolution and a spiritual evolution all occuring at the same time but at different rates. The question becomes when will the three achieve unity?

Thank you 0.

You're right.

As a matter of fact, I gave similar advice to another a couple days ago.


Advice, much easier to give than follow it seems.

Perhaps I just needed a glimpse outside my bag.

lol.

the answer is within you anyway.. and if i do the thinking for you, then what good is it to think for yourself. this is not my thread. so with respect to aehter, i will decline to comment further.

Innocence is a state of grace, a newborn has a clean slate on a foundation based upon two million years of survival instincts. On their own instincts are a means for survival.
Within our DNA is a desire to be the center of all things, and to survive at any cost. This can never be so.

Innocence is the ability to reason about our spiritual nature in a manner where we recognize our own mortality and our imperfections. Children donot have the maturity to understand their own psyche. Innocence as far as it applies to children is a recognition that this ability to discern is not fully developed, hence any self centered behavior is provided a pass.

Innocence as a state of grace is a spiritual virtue. It is acting in a manner that doesnot violate G-d or your fellow creatures.

I saw the reply to seer. If you were trying to relate your reply to multiple topics when directly replying to me, then no wonder it didn't make sense to me. It's probably a better idea to not try and do that. All you are doing is creating more confusion for others. You don't have to try and be all fancy like that just to try and impress people, as it may do the exact opposite. Instead, maybe be a little more personal and answer directly so your replies make sense. Either that or don't quote anyone as if you are answering then directly.



Just a little of friendly advice.

no offense 0, but i would never allow anyone to do my thinking for me. i also would never suggest that to anyone.

ahh,, german beer night!,,

good afternoon seer,, bea,, aether,, sap,, jb,, brazil,, dion and 0,,

the most perfect delightful company too share a cold beer with,,

cheers,, indeed,,


much love,,

Hiya Nobody...




Welcome back.

:)

hey seer,,

how wonderfully kind you are,,

thankyou,,

much love,,

Sure, the desire to survive is there. But what of the desire to die? It must also be there, yes?

Why do we have the desire to pro-create? Is this not the natural way of circumventing death in an selfless way?

You say that children do not have the maturity to understand their own psyche. Perhaps that is true...and perhaps that is why they look to others who are more mature for guidance.

Self-centered behavior is not 'provided a pass'. Self centered behavior is eating, drinking, breathing, shitting, crying, etc. It is all there and ingrained within us from conception.

There are instinctual behaviors and there are learned social behaviors. The 'discernment' you are speaking of is how to get what you want and need from the more mature humans around us. It is the social construct that is learned.

So, putting aside the desire to survive...which can be expressed through behaviors we all share at birth...what should be called 'inherited nature', I ask you again in perhaps more specific terms...

Isn't the lack of learned social behavior expressed through a child's innocence closer to perfection than the learned social behaviors of the mature among us?

And if this is true, what does this say about the idea of 'overcoming our inherited nature'?