X Marks the Spot

To choose only symbols that are common to all systems, and rejecting all words / names that are associated with any metaphysical theory or anything religious is futile, since all language has a history.

I take refuge in vagueness to warn me against valuing anything non essential.

Perhaps the most accomplished analyst of mythology in modern times was the late Mircea Eliade, chairman of the Department of History of Religions at the University of Chicago, and editor of the Encyclopedia of Religion. From his meticulous, lifelong survey of the subject, professor Eliade drew a stunning conclusion: literally every component of early civilizations--from religion to art and architecture--expressed symbolically the desire to recover and to re-live the lost Golden Age. That which symbolically transported the participant back to the First Time, the Golden Age, was sacred. That which did not was transient and mundane, of no interest.

these updates are live and on topics which ARE on the table

gotta apprieciate the irony, and learn to duck.

•Gravity was the focus of 20th century astronomy

•For the 21st century, it will be electromagnetism and plasmas in addition

•This forthcoming scientific revolution is presaged by the rapid pace of discoveries about our own star, the Sun, and its total plasma environment, and discoveries about the nature of the interstellar medium.

•In volume, 99.999% of all the observable matter in the universe exists in the plasma state. This had led to the coinage of the term "Plasma Universe."

When our solar system first encountered the effects of the entry into tour solar system of highly charged, magnetised, dusty plasma from the 'local fluff' plasma cloud in the latter part of the 1800`s, a marked increase in humans contact with non human intelligence was observed as well as fluctuations of our sun, which the Carrington effect Solar Storm of 1859 was the most notable.
Tesla, Crowley, Steiner, Russell, Blavatsky, Jung are some of the high profile examples of the epidemic of esoteric experience rampant within the dominant Abrahamic technological cultures of the West.

THE 19TH CENTURY SPIRITUALIST
AND OCCULT REVIVAL
in England and Europe
[link to blessedquietness.com]

Germany progressed non human communication and translation further than other nations in the 1930`s to 1945.

In 1945 USA and UK were aware of the following.

1) The information being received was accurate in the nature of it`s physics but because the physics were unlike any humans had imagined that our universe was comprised of, awareness of them transformed what humans are.

Awareness made it impossible to accept previous human formed lifestyles and beliefs.

2) Awareness of any part of this information received prompted what became known as "non local conscious" to engage and awareness increased via synchronicity , expressed as instant knowing, following experience of related events.

In other words the person began to think, express , anticipate and expect differently.

3) Because the information originates from intelligences which experience the same environment as ourselves in a manner that is unimaginable, we can not imagine the lifestyle that the information we receive forms.

Hence we can not know our future.

We can only know it is not what we once imagined.

To address this the following steps were taken .

The Office of Strategic Services (OSS) was utilized and expanded globally in the form of the CIA to locate and observe world wide individuals receiving communication

Their information was given to The Armed Forces Security Agency (AFSA], later to be known as the NSA, for translation and projection of outcome.

By the late 60`s it was considered "safe" to plan a global communications system, accessible to all, which in it`self ,acted as the interface for incoming non human information and it`s expression including, the synchronization of non local conscious effects.that result.

This is the simple outline to the complex situation we are now within

The premise of instanteous transfer is potentially a spiritual evolution. It does however, have a downside for those individuals that are unable to compartmentalize external stimuli. Authority, in this case modern medicine, appears is too eager to categorize and treat such individuals as unbalanced. Instead of exploring the root cause, modern medicine is often to quick to identify and stigmitize such individuals and pharmaceutically treat sensations as an aberrations from the norm. This leads to a relunctance in most to further explore these aspects of human potentiality.

It is ironic that we trust technology to provide the ability to make us aware and yet we consider what resides in us as an abberation. We have been culturally conditioned to accept what authority wish to impose on us as acceptable norms regarding our individual spiritually. I can understand why the suppression of such potentiality has been discouraged. It has unforeseen ramification, and and unforeseen variances are not something authority is willing to deal with. I must disagree with when you state that such new thinking has been sanctioned. To me, it is more resembles an experiment with human guinea pigs.

Again, social conscious is easily swayed by conditioning, what is acceptable one day is demonized the next. While technological advances (implants) that are touted to improve the human condition are completely sanctioned; the human attempting to delve into the natural aspects of human potentially represents a threat that cannot be controlled. Just my opinion.

good point
overview by nature functions (affects) above downwards

in hierarchical society that expresses as:
future dictates (structures) present forcing past (memory) into reconfiguration

there are at present no known overview personalities in political, military and belief leadership nor are any anticipated in our near future

good point
overview by nature functions (affects) above downwards

in hierarchical society that expresses as:
future dictates (structures) present forcing past (memory) into reconfiguration

there are at present no known overview personalities in political, military and belief leadership nor are any anticipated in our near future

The sensation is condescension, produced by an inadequacy for proper summarization.

not at all. It is a honest reflection on my part. What transpires is what is meant to be. No value other then the immediate need to be applied. The responsible response would be to reply honestly without fear.

Is it not possible to learn from disagreement and the appropiate discourrse?

If you think my response was dishonest and fearful then you need to work on your connection with the 'non local consciousness'.

If my original post was directed to you, you wpould be right. As it was not, you may be internalizing an external inappropiately

Me? You quote my response to your response to a comment I made about a conversation you and Aether were having...

...then retort referencing your 'original' post.

Seems as though you are trying to muddy the waters intentionally.

Then you say that I am internalizing an external inappropriately.

It's ok. It's a good tactic to use. Intentionally complicate things then make a simple statement about your opponent.

So, in other words, we are about to witness a train wreck.

jonny prior to your response to my comments to Aether I never addressed you. My post to your comments were a continuation of my discourse with Aether not you. It was honest. I only apply tactics to foes.

not at all. It is a honest reflection on my part. What transpires is what is meant to be. No value other then the immediate need to be applied. The responsible response would be to reply honestly without fear.