X Marks the Spot

And see im fascinated with pyramids... Macchu Picchu is a place I would love to go and take a tour of the pyramids around the world.
Peru is another place on my travel agenda ....
Im also drawn to the Hill of Tara in Ireland as well and Rennes Le Chateau

yes
i was just thinking about the local Sahara archetype
i suppose there more than most the results of out planetary realignments transformed and lush green paradise into desert emotionally dramatically both for the people survivors and the local archetype
then we have pyramids sitting there looking much the same as they ever did and all the emotional thoughts of the survivors ancestry up until today immersed in the poor local archetype
imagine all that for several thousand years
no wonder it comes across as "touchy" and wary of strange buildings of triangular design
i saw it`s point at the time but never took notice because then it never fitted into anything i was directly interested in
but today i see the same thing differently
like it was not until tonight i realized it was my touching the great pyramid that prompted it`s arrival
like it never crossed my mind why i was prompted to only touch the one pyramid and suggest going straight into the desert
my Egyptian hosts were flabbergasted
funny
looking back you see the sense of your intuition

Back last year while deep into the She thread .. I had a dream that Hathor and Sekhmet was in . I was walking with them beside a temple along the river, winged sundisc floating above Hathors head and we talked about many things . They wanted me to take a bath in the river but was woke up by my son at that point and it never continued.
I believe I was in Egypt at one time. As well as a couple of other really profound dreams I have had that the details to have not withered in the least.
This is one reason why I really want to travel there

which makes me think fringe
what it all needs is informational love
love possessing emotion of information kind
yes
alchemical wedding
cross fertilization of emotional information within loving environment (embrace)

Just like that picture I sent you for the Alchemical wedding and Love is the atomic bonding agent ... remember the emotion it evoked in you when I sent it? the two elements combining

and i was just thinking as i made a cup of tea that this is about the whole of our solar system
until this era all the planets of the two families of planets along with our sun experienced the motions of integration into our present family
as our knowing (emotion) increases via solar alteration we are going to notice all of us experiencing the feedback of our final understanding of why everything in the families experienced what we have
it has a happy ending but it will be a tearful journey to it`s happy ending because everything experienced so much that has festered into emotional mystery
all got the affects but nothing knew the cause
now we do and we are the only conscious walking around on two legs talking as we do survivors in our solar system our emotions are going to be crucially significant both for ourselves and our solar system
wow
see, i never thought about this until now and i am thinking now because we have reached that location where the next thing we begin to do is think about this
amazed

I got banned again. Anyone know a good IP hopper, thingy so I can still play?

I'm beginning to think they don't want me on GLP.

He keeps putting his hand in the cookie jar
Welcome back how was your trip home Seer?

and i`ve been talking like incessantly and most likely given fringe a headache as she kindly listed to me

In Boorowa, Lachlan Valley, Nr Yass, New South Wales. Reported 23rd November

Vin Diagram, Seed of Life,

[link to www.cropcircleconnector.com]

woot woot !!

You know Seer I synced hard off that with all those Vesica Piscis postings I made about the heart
Remember those here recently ?

Start with our planets orbiting the sun in a plane, as they do now. Bring our solar system into another field, and it will string the planets in a line, along their direction of travel. This is like what happened to comet SL9 in Jupiter's field, from your first post. So we have all the planets spinning and traveling down the same axis. When Saturn spirals in to it's position in front of the sun, the current stream to the sun is suddenly (not gradually) diverted to Saturn , causing the "Saturn flare". This increase of current causes Saturn to fission, forming a new planet. As Donald Scott would tell you, the fissioning doesn't just leave Saturn and it's offspring drifting apart, or even thrown off tangentially like they would in the case of gravitational forces. The two planets repel each other, and spiral widely around that original axis. The sun and other planets move up through the center. So it's not that Saturn drifts IN to it's present position, but rather (from the sun's perspective) moves out and down to it's present orbit. As the sun leaves the external field, planets return to their coplanar orbits around our current filament.
What's nice here is that by merely bringing the planets into line with Saturn leading ,then the flare, the fissioning,and the drift of Saturn out to it's present orbit, all proceed logically in the order they were observed to happen.

This does not imply that Saturn was not originally captured from outside our solar system. One way to bring the planets into the position of traveling in a line, is to bring our solar system to z-pinch with another filament. Near z-pinch is also the best time to capture an object spiraling widely around the other filament. Remember that if the other filament is spiraling around ours, it's plane is at an angle to ours. Meaning any object captured from the other filament is going to be coming in at an angle inclined to our orbital plane.
The Birkeland current does control the dynamics, and the big planet does move into the sun's current. It's just that there is nothing gradual about the diversion of current to the planet.

The Saturn crescent is the clue to what was happening. If Saturn was giving off light as a sun, could it form a crescent? No,we should only see the full circle. It is only an object that reflects light that shows phases. But for an object to show a thin crescent of reflected light, the light source must be even farther away than the object it lights. So our sun lighting Saturn still would not form a crescent on Saturn. So how do we solve this?
If we think of the planets strung out in a line, along some current filament, a planet between us and Saturn could block out all of the light (like a total eclipse), or leave a ring (annular eclipse). If, however, we take that filament and curve it, then we could have a crescent of Saturn (as a sun), appearing from behind some eclipsing planet.
What I propose, is we had Saturn as a sun out front, curving around right behind was some planet (Jupiter?). That planet was only visible to us in that it blocked light from Saturn. Then the Venus Mars pair following behind them. The fact that we could see the face of Venus and Mars means there must have still been light coming from the Sun behind us. This last point is sometimes missed. Saturn as a sun could not light he face of Venus or Mars from our perspective.

Morning all, was reading this article [link to www.livescience.com] and it reminded me of seers picture.

The universe may grow like a giant brain, according to a new computer simulation.

hey dion
the prophesy can be this:

our solar system environmental alterations geographically affect local areas on earth in varying degrees pro rata to our earths structural function with our suns heliosphere

if we accept the for this topic the cause generally is fluctuating electrical content, which, in this instance is arising (increasing)
and we accept nasa telling electricity is the fabric of our mind we see this:

the americas from the middle latitude of south america to the near border of canada experience generally higher increase in charge than other locations globally

in this location (america`s) there is a high concentration of people whom believe earths most recent belief of consequence labeled abrahamic christian
because the belief is the youngest it is furthest from origin of historical events which prompted the belief to occur
hence the belief contains quite accurate descriptions of the symptoms and events from history of earth that were taken from ancestry records
but
being the youngest (furthest from truth linear time backwards) it also contains the most errors within it`s reasoning and conclusions for the symptoms/events it records

this gives the impression to believers when similar symptoms/events repeat, because the symptoms/events are in the stories and are seen to be true
the reasoning and answers provided in the stories must be true to

combine the above with the "coincidence" that most of this Americas location has, via it`s technology and will, become the planets only "superpower"
and
the people are now sensing/experiencing the realization that their technology supporting their global statues and social infrastructure is designed to function in a universe that never existed
thus is seen/experienced to function poorly both technically and socially if and when our universe that does exist alters noticeably

the above is the complexity of the americas emotional state in our noticeable future regarding indigenous prophecy

Bondi Beach could be closed for up to 36 hours while tests are conducted on the algal bloom that stained the water red this morning.

[link to www.smh.com.au]

What say you Bibletards :)

Of course you are now expected to believe that he was correct about all of relativity, but wrong about singularities. This is because those that want to use the singularity want to be able to divide by zero. Even in grade school you are taught that is not allowed.
[link to www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com]
As Crothers correctly points out, Swartzchilds solution applies to one object in a universe devoid of any mass but that of the singularity. No other solution for two or more gravitational masses has ever been solved, therefore all talk of multiple singularities, binaries, etc is useless, or talk of singularities in a universe filled with additional masses.

Then again if they actually used Swartzschilds solution instead of the corrupted version by Hilbert, singularities would never have popped up in the math in the first place. One only needs compare the solution claimed to be his with the one in his original paper.

in the context of topic

you find out by finding out
is not faith
faith is believing what you have never discovered to be true
is true

is the sensation

The story of Earth’s change in orbit is a study of Earth catastrophes. Calendars ended and new ones began because of these events. Mankind has continually fiddled with calendars in an effort to keep up with the changing heavens.

Cook posits there was a 225 day year during the Era of the Gods, based on the Egyptian King list record for the period called “kings before the flood”. The flood is dated at 3147 BCE and was the cataclysm that ensued when the polar water bulge was released.

When Earth detached from Saturn it ended up in an orbit with a 240 day year.

In Cook’s words:

“The 240-day year was originally found by inspecting the data of the "kings after the flood," but it can also be inferred from the remnants of calendars in use in the following era (as in dividing the year up into 4 60-day periods, as in China). The 240-day year would have been in effect from 3147 BC through 2349 BC. The equivalent orbital distance from the Sun would have averaged 70.3 million miles (0.75 AU).”

The next change in the calendar occurred in 2349 BCE, marking the end of the Egyptian Old Kingdom. This was brought about by Venus and its massive plasmoid bolt that broke up Earth’s equatorial rings called the Absu by the Mesopotamians and the Duat by the Egyptians. This flood was from the heavens, raining down its debris and water, accompanied by endless rains. This is the “flood of Noah” and is also the time of the first appearance of the Moon, which stabilized within an estimated period of 35 years.

“It is at this time that we see the first indications of calendars in widely separated regions of the world. The Earth is now 74 million miles from the Sun (0.797 AU), and the year had extended to 260 days.
The regular appearance of the Moon became the calendar, signaling to everyone the days for religious festivities. There were, during this first period after the fall of the Absu, ten months of 26 days each. At the end of ten months, the year and the cycle of religious observances started over.

The 260-day year is an acknowledged number, which shows up in Mesoamerican sources as the Tzolkin calendar. The Chilam Balam makes specific mention of the addition of "days of the year" at this time. “

Following this we have a calendar year change in 2193 BCE due to another outburst from Venus making an electrical contact with Earth. With this event climatic changes are recorded worldwide, with social upheavals and abandonment of settlements spanning two hundred years. Egypt’s Middle Kingdom emerged afterwards.

….”the Akkadian empire fails and the Old Kingdom of Egypt comes to a close. Worldwide there is a lack of rain, or a lack of light, lasting years. Mesopotamia and Egypt (and other locations) take up to 200 years to recover.

The Earth is now 77 million miles from the Sun (0.83 AU). The year went to 270 or 280 days (probably 273 days). I suspect that the number of months in the year stayed at 10, each approximately 27 or 28 days long. Mesoamerican culture accommodated this easily by extending their 20 by 13 Tzolkin calendar by another cycle of 13 days, and just ignoring the fact that their calendar was now 13 days short. Other people apparently adopted 10 months of 27 and 28 days to fill the year.”

Cook has the following to say about Venus and its impacts in both 2349 and 2193 BCE:

“I would suggest, as others have also, that the planet Venus was the agent of the disturbances in 2349 and 2193 BC. In fact, we can be certain that Venus appeared a total of four times during this period. The first appearance of 2349 BC was absolutely spectacular and, at the same time, so psychologically disturbing to people the world over that this single event is frequently recorded as the very start of history -- often as a retelling of the flood of 3147 BC (as in the "flood of Noah"), coupled with the first appearance of the Moon. The most frightening aspect of 2349 BC was what looked like the collapse of the ocean in the south sky, the Absu. It was thought to have fallen onto the Earth like a flood, for the commotion in the sky was accompanied by endless rains and storms. The other disturbance was that the sky turned blood red.”

This period of 156 years of instability (2349 – 2193 BCE) caused by Venus’s regular visits could be considered as one drawn out change in the length of the Earth’s year, or as two different distinct events.

Following on, we have another change in 1492 BCE called the “Earth Shock”, which marks the end of the Middle Kingdom and the beginning of the New Kingdom. This was caused by a catastrophic electrical event with Venus once again, which hadn’t shown up since its last appearance in 2193 BCE.

“After 1492 BC the Earth's orbit increases significantly, to 0.99 AU. The 360-day year is a clear certainty from many records, and in effect up to 747 BC. The equivalent orbital distance from the Sun would have averaged 92.1 million miles. There were 12 months of 30 days.

The 360-day year is so well established from so many documents, that some researchers today just take it for granted, although students of antiquity have to apologetically add, "plus the five days," or make excuses for the people of this era with statements like, "they used an idealized year" or "they could not count." What an amazing statement! Counting would have been the highest science of the human intellect since the Upper Paleolithic.”

In 747 BCE, at the end of the New Kingdom, we have the beginning of a series of visits from Mars, Venus, and Mercury that caused huge disturbances in the Mediterranean and Near East, with great loss of life. These catastrophes continued until 685 BCE, marking the beginning of the quiescence we experience today.

“After 747 the Earth assumed today's orbit of 93.2 million miles (1.0 AU), and a year of 365.24 days. The Moon changed its period to 29-1/2 days, but there were now slightly more than 12-1/3 lunar months in the year. This would cause no end of problems, for the lunar months no longer coincided comfortably with dates in the solar year.”

So there we have it – an Earth in turmoil and an ongoing quest to create calendars and temples to enshrine these changes, to mark a moment in time when these cataclysms occurred and to create a system of regularity to measure the flow of time over the year. To me it is incredulous that this information is still hidden from view. Cook is making a major contribution to our understanding of Earth history to compile this material in such an accessible way.

I don't understand Lebanese, but here is a news cast talking about the 'two suns' that have been spotted now.
[link to www.youtube.com]

Of course no one believes it's Nibiru right???

it is not that they are not there
it is they are visible because of our membrane (magnetosphere)
and opinion is it is our ionosphere that translates the electromagnetic signals into visible signal (light)

Hello Everyone,

Stay Safe and Balanced.

Shine Brightly.

Much Love,


[link to www.youtube.com]