X Marks the Spot

Well of course I do, we all do. It's what we're here for. I've never hid that and never will. Our reality is what we make of it. It's tinged with repetitive experience, patten recognition, raw emotion, and various other things. But there's no secret there, not really. We all forget what we are here to experience the illusion in order to take back our observations to the whole. It doesn't mean we can't remember after, or have to fall to bitterness when we do. Again, we have differing gnosis. It doesn't make mine OR yours any less valid. In the end we all see, feel what we take out and take back. Everything is always possibility, potential. Some accentuate the positive, some the negative.

so much talking..
leave it behind..
be free

you dont need all that TO BREATHE..
i love you..

As could we all, we're in it together, after all :)

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

The one thing Socrates consistently claimed to have knowledge of was "the art of love"

Some are made for simplicity, some for complexity, most for in the middle. All on our own paths to our own destinations with only the ultimate destination in common, we all get there in our own way. We don't need group consensus for that. Knowledge is simply the point where we stop taking things on faith and belief and trust what we know to be true through observation and experience and that varies for each sharing the journey. And then some seek the everything, and some the nothing, but they're both the same.

But I do agree with you on one thing if I caught your point earlier... We tend to not live in the present moment. We're always in the past or in the future. What we did, what we will do, rarely just "being," rarely realizing all moments are one moment, the one we currently inhabit. And too, there is a lot of intellecutalization of this, measuring of philosophies without making one of our own that codifies our perceptions. We have a singular, subjective view as does everyone else traveling through space on a lonely rock. So what we speak is true for "us," not for the whole. But then sometimes it is.

Scientists have found a small but significant deceleration in the Pioneer spacecraft as it makes its way through interstellar space.


For several years, NASA analysts have reported a slow but steady “tug” on the Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft as they head outward in opposite directions from the Sun. Based on the gravity-only model of the universe under which observational research is constrained, the research team has no explanation for what has been termed the “Pioneer Anomaly”.

Pioneer 10 was launched from Cape Canaveral on March 2, 1972 on a primary flyby mission to Jupiter. It was the first spacecraft to reach Jupiter and return close up images of the giant planet. Its last signal was received on January 23, 2003 when it was almost 8 billion miles from Earth. Until the faster moving Voyager 1 space probe overtook it, Pioneer 10 was the most remote man-made object in space.............

Most of the volcanic activity occurs under water. And there are many times more volcanoes under water than they thought.

The reason the greatest amount of growth occurs in the oceans is because of the sea water. The electrolyte acts as a ground, shorting the electrical charge in the crust, facilitating the growth in ocean crust.

As the crust bends to flatten and the mountains pop up raw, like the Himalayas or the Rockies, the piezoelectric effect pumps a huge charge into the surrounding crust, keeping that area of crust from flattening out.

Look at the elevation maps at:
[link to www.ngdc.noaa.gov]
The red to white spaces are elevations over a mile high.


Look at Color Asia
[link to www.ngdc.noaa.gov]
That white space is a plateau three miles high, and then the mountains go up from there

Look at Color North America
[link to www.ngdc.noaa.gov]
The red area with white in the center is the Colorado Plateau. It starts at one mile high and the mountains go up from there.

Look at Color South America.
[link to www.ngdc.noaa.gov]

The red with white space along the Andes is a plateau that is two mile high and the mountains go up from there

Look at Color Africa
[link to www.ngdc.noaa.gov]
Most of Africa is under a mile. Only the mountains top that. Each red area is a raised plateau, with rivers draining the charge.

Each plateau exists because of the electric charge holding up that area of crust. Think how the water in clouds is held up by the electrical charge. All of the charged water in those plateaus are holding up the crust. The rivers that flow from those plateaus short out or drain the electrical charge, and the crust begins to subside, causing massive earthquakes.

Look at Asia. The major rivers are draining the charge from the crust, causing massive earthquakes in China. Over time, the whole region will collapse, flattening out, the Himalayas will be a jumble.

Look at North America. The Appalachians on the east were once raw and jagged like the Rockies. The Mississippi started small, drained the charge on that side, the mountains collapsed into a jumble flattening the crust. When that happened the Rockies popped up charging the Colorado Plateau. The Rio Grande Rift will grow over time, the Rio Grande draining the charge in the plateau, and the Rockies will collapse into a jumble like the Appalachians. The Rio Grande will become as extensive as the Mississippi.

Over time, all of the continents will lose their charge like Africa and become low elevation. Future maps will show mostly green, i.e., under a mile. Look at any place on earth using Google Maps. Zoom in on any major river basin like the Amazon, Congo, Mississippi, etc..., until you can see the topographic elevations. You will see jumbled terrain where once raw mountains like the Rockies used to stand.

The local Tewa indians here in New Mexico remember when Thunderbird came walking, and the sacred mountains popped up, so the Rockies are modern.

Because they do not want plasma and electricity. They want their Dark Matter and Dark Energy, their Black Holes and Neutron Stars and stars made of diamonds. So much more exciting you know....

So EM radiation is what between creation and absorption? It is created as an EM phenomenon and absorbed as an EM phenomenon, but travels as something different between the two events?

I am conflicted about our definitions of fields. Gauss, Weber, and Ampere never mentioned magnetic fields or implied them in any of their writings or correspondences. To me they seem to be implying as you said dipole magnetic action from charge interaction. Only after was a field concept applied to the magnetic force mainly by Maxwell and solidified by Eisenstein because he thought Electrodynamics needed correcting.

Hence his first paragraph in his paper “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies.”

“It is known that Maxwell’s electrodynamics—as usually understood at the present time—when applied to moving bodies, leads to asymmetries which do not appear to be inherent in the phenomena. Take, for example, the reciprocal electrodynamic action of a magnet and a conductor. . . .” [link to www.thunderbolts.info]


To which no more mention is made until the last paragraph:

“Furthermore it is clear that the asymmetry mentioned in the introduction as arising when we consider the currents produced by the relative motion of a magnet and a conductor, now disappears. Moreover, questions as to the ‘seat’ of electrodynamic electromotive forces now have no point.”

So Maxwell took away the cause of the asymmetry and Eisenstein made sure no one bothered to research further, after all, there was no longer any point, it was all relative and due only to moving frames, not an inherent phenomena. God said do not look for the source, where it comes from has no point any longer, and all bowed and turned away from electrodynamics and the search for its source. [link to www.thunderbolts.info]

we addressed this point a few days ago, we got visuals on it

it feels

for a long time it was believed that our universe (us) was tiny particles collective forming into shaped definition with the defined shapes of people, angels and god(s) possessing consciousness within their shape and all other shapes were background for the three conscious shapes to consciously live within

today our technology is returning a different picture of our universe (us)
it has shown us there is no nothing (void) anywhere and everywhere is within something real
that something real turns out to be "field" like in nature labeled aether/higgs
what is refereed to as energy is information (motivated emotion/will/motive) and what our technology has been observing for decades is our environments information (energy) transmitting through our no void "solid" environmental mediums
at all our dimensional environments baselines , material and non material, the expression of information (energy) is observed enacting the same way
at the information (energy) transmission source, wherever and whatever that source may be , what is observed is the information radiated source displays the affect it will provide when it reaches it target(s)

between source and target(s) the information (energy) gives the impression of motion because our "solid" environment sequentially expresses the content (motive) of the information (energy) to the information's (energies) intended target(s)

to place that into context for ourselves think this

when you cross from one side of a room to the other
you experience the motion of doing so
what has happened is the radiated information (energy) that is you has been sequentially replicated by our "solid" environment the distance across the room
when you lift your arm our "solid" environment has sequentially replicated your arms signal to match your emotional command to move it

our "solid" environment replicates our signals within it forming reality of motion to that which is conscious within our "solid" environment to sense motion

same with all our emotional expression (signals), our environment replicates our emotive experiences (signals) forming reality of our emotive experience (life) for our senses to experience for real

that is how intimate we are within our environment

not an easy picture to get into conscious awareness and not a description of reality that has been approved by our authorities yet

this is the beta test in the run up 12.12.2014

Good Morning Everyone,

Stay safe and balanced.


[link to www.youtube.com]

Well of course I do, we all do. It's what we're here for. I've never hid that and never will. Our reality is what we make of it. It's tinged with repetitive experience, patten recognition, raw emotion, and various other things. But there's no secret there, not really. We all forget what we are here to experience the illusion in order to take back our observations to the whole. It doesn't mean we can't remember after, or have to fall to bitterness when we do. Again, we have differing gnosis. It doesn't make mine OR yours any less valid. In the end we all see, feel what we take out and take back. Everything is always possibility, potential. Some accentuate the positive, some the negative.

Their origin differs from that of the cosmic rays discovered exactly a hundred years ago by Victor Hess, which originate in the explosions of supernovae.

Just happily reading along...

Morning!

Just happily reading along...

Morning!

:)

Morning all.

I often ask myself how that's working out for me...being clever.

I usually answer...'uh, o.k. I guess.'

Then I retort with 'Good. Keep it up, then.'

good morning

These were days of ominous calm, when the people waited for they knew not what.

The presence of an unseen doom was felt, the hearts of men were stricken.

Morning aether.


I have had this ringing in my head since I awoke...



Everything feels very still right now.

Collective breath holding.


Ominous indeed.

good
after 9000 years maybe people are feeling
fuck , it was all not true!

What do you think of my ramblings on comets, magnetite polymorphs, and endothermic reactions with solar radiation?

I'd be interested to know what your electrical engineering friends think about it.

i said clever because you correctly identified the public turning point/event for nasa

Comet Holmes - a Media Non-event
03/29/08
[link to www.thunderbolts.info]

The Electric Comet: The Elephant in NASA's Living Room?
29 Jun 2011
[link to www.thunderbolts.info]