loosely in essence the natural bonding of non previously shared concepts,,

yet within a certain context a different anology entirely exists,,


that was not the answer sought however it is the one given by design
---------

the first observation was incorrect as a question/statement,,

the square rule for au heat is void as it is simply not correct,,

it allows not fully for changeble gravity effect..

whilst gravity is a constant,, there exist fluctual pulse varibles,, and it is therefore not a reliable model to base measurment upon,,

heat and gravity effect each other,, so the varibles cannot be calculated in such a manner,,

to see an object thusly,, requires a greator understanding of gravity effect upon heat measurible signitures,,

it is permissible to say that to begin with 800 au at such a distance,, based upon a known gravity composition is pushing the boundaries of acceptability,,

yet this is the measure currently used,,


much love,,