Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,214 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 18,109
Pageviews Today: 23,378Threads Today: 2Posts Today: 109
12:09 AM

Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
Message Subject X Marks the Spot
Poster Handle aether
Post Content
Explanations That Don’t Explain
Nov 19, 2012

“Planetary nebulae are glowing shells of gas around white dwarfs,” according to the standard explanation. This is a better description of dogma than of the image.

“Astronomers have long debated how these symmetric jets could be created,” the press release continues. “Stars are spherical”; the jets not so much. In fact, not at all. But astronomy has a long history of not letting facts get in the way of good explanations.

The nebula is “likely to have…two white dwarfs at its centre…. As the stars aged, they expanded…, one…sucking material from its companion. This material [formed] an accretion disc.” Gravitational interaction with the binaries caused the disc to precess, or wobble, and the wobbling disc then shaped the jets into knotted twists. The observations “combined…with existing computer modeling to explain in detail for the first time how these bizarre shapes came about.”..............
 Quoting: observation

[link to www.thunderbolts.info]
 Quoting: aether

Toad's thoughts he has presented me with are very similar to this, except he was referencing black holes instead. He has always said that black holes are rarely, if ever, singular. They always come in pairs. A black hole is never a black hole...it is two black holes interacting with each other.
 Quoting: Saptaparna

toad is like nassim, they utilize consensus words (back holes/wholes) to describe synergistic processes at their locations different to what consensus attributes to the same words
Please verify you're human:

Reason for copyright violation: