REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
Message Subject
|
X Marks the Spot
|
Poster Handle
|
aether |
Post Content
|
Right now, the in situ information in the above 2nd paper has been supportive with what you are putting forth because the Sun is NOT in the LIC proper nor in the G-Cloud but in the transition region between the two. One would think such a region to perhaps be rather dull but with interactive “shocks”, ionization, double-layers etc … I think maybe not. I could be wrong but I at least need to see if anything filamentary, of higher density, etc etc has been observed there. [ link to www.thunderbolts.info] Quoting: Theosophy Quoting: aether I like that the mainstream found that the "scattering screens" of enhanced electron density "lie close to the edges of several of our dynamical clouds". The fact that they are so clearly mapping out Birkeland current filaments and double layers without a model to guide them is impressive. If you or I showed these correlations, we'd be accused of interpreting the data to fit our EU model. Now remember where Sirius sits in this picture: [ link to en.wikipedia.org] Remember that we were able to show that only if Sirius and the sun were spiraling along the same axis, would we be able to explain the relationship between Sirius' proper motion and earth's rate of precession. (The work of the Sirius Research Institute is important here). So we have redundancy, with the motion of local clouds giving us the same axis for the Birkeland current, as we were able to derive from looking at star motions alone. Quoting: observation [ link to www.thunderbolts.info] Quoting: aether You know; it actually is pretty amazing that radio scintillations were found and noted. But I guess the goal was simply to take advantage of as many sight lines as were possible in order to distinguish enough differentiations to establish bulk flows. As a result there exist some good (generally) defined cloud data and a little more than just a hint that there is “turbulence” at their interacting “edges”. Hence, the door has been opened to further pursue resolution of those interacting boundaries close to home. I think you bring up another important point when you say that “… they are so clearly mapping out Birkeland current filaments and double layers without a model to guide them". So called “turbulence theory” in relation to the formation of filaments has never been an adequate solution, they know this, but they keep using it: The prevalence of filaments in the ISM has never been adequately explained by turbulence theory … Some ISM filaments are not from turbulence but are the edges of expanding shells. [ link to ned.ipac.caltech.edu] How does one characterize that? They actually do have a model to “guide” them (“turbulence theory”) but it’s known to be inadequate so another incorrect 'model' forms their foundation. Until H observations of the LIC and/or G-Cloud are is done for local region we won’t be seeing any resolutions of the filaments (images). It is nice to be aware though that the radio scintillations are pointing directly at them. At this point it appears that the research has revealed a gap in our relation to the local interstellar medium and most all work I’ve pursued focuses primarily on “turbulence theory” related musings. Suffice to say that IBEX and Ulysses have provided some assistance I don’t think anything is going to amount the scope that H observations might provide. [ link to www.usm.lmu.de] Quoting: observation
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|