Brea, as to the first bold: they already are and agreed.

Dion, as to the second:

we spend a lot of time talking about moving away from 'duality'... thinking of stuff as compared to a single 'oposite'.
and while i agree with u that a thing can be better understood when also contemplating what it is *not*, don't you think Christ's lessson (trinity over duality) and the growing understanding of the rainbow nature of the human personality (sex identity being just an example) should also teach that if we wish to go a step further we can compare a thing to system instead of 'things' instead of a singular 'thing'.

i guess i'm trying to say that it seems incomplete to balance an idea on only one other idea.

the singular lamniscate might be as imaginary as zero and infinity.

six fold geometry sujests itself to me.