X Marks the Spot | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32430667 United States 02/22/2013 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32430667 I've been thinking on your coptic jars and forms and the connection with water. All forms of water could fit in the jars but ice because it is solid. This morning I woke up and forgot my dream but when I opened the fridge I remembered when I looked at ice forming. My dream was 'there was mold in the ice'. vinegar cleans ice makers well Yes, like an onion, I assume I need a new filter and to throw out the ice. Bout to get my face mask on and get to it, lol Heavy fish in an electromagnetic sea. Each organ a filter and an inherent bias. Batteries, batteries, batteries and superconductors of course. Happy German Beer night! |
Seer777 Ride the wings of the mind User ID: 31248385 United States 02/22/2013 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Seer777 Perhaps that is where the concept of the sky 'rolling up like a scroll' originates from... i would say with certainty it is and remember abyss seems to fit our topic of this moment suddenly a lot of mixed memory comes with that /z\ blame anger hate despair distrust revenge whoa quite a yucky emotional sensation Not sure I would utilize those particular emotions, but concern perhaps, at the very least... Kolbrin pg 11 Quoting: Seer777 The Appearance of the Destroyer God "Then came the day when all things became still and apprehensive, for God caused a sign to appear in the Heavens, so that men should know the Earth would be afflicted, and the sign was a strange star". "The star grew and waxed to a great brightness and was awesome to behold. It put forth horns and sang, being unlike any other ever seen. So men , seeing it, said among themselves, 'Surely, this is God appearing in the Heavens above us'. The star was not God, though it was directed by His design, but the people had not the wisdom to understand'. "Then God manifested Himself in the Heavens. His voice was as the roll of thunders and He was clothed with smoke and fire. He carried lightings in His hand and His breath, falling upon the Earth, brought forth brimstone and embers. His eye was a black void and His mouth an abyss containing the winds of Destruction. He encircled the whole of the Heavens, bearing upon His back a black robe adorned with stars". "Such was the likeness and manifestation of God in those days. Awesome was His countenance, terrible His voice of wrath, the sun and moon hid themselves in fear and there was a heavy darkness over the face of the Earth". Last Edited by Seer777 on 02/22/2013 03:12 PM Difficulties strengthen the Mind as labor does the body... ~Seneca |
aether (OP) User ID: 34923382 United Kingdom 02/22/2013 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they became the god that went away Quoting: aether and they would, we see that now the origin of the "hims" the dominant one (first one) the girl that came after (venus) was never the one because she was never the first one they see it now because we can show them kronos was 4 males, first gay couples, lol |
aether (OP) User ID: 34923382 United Kingdom 02/22/2013 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun. Quoting: observation |
nobody User ID: 34494410 United Kingdom 02/22/2013 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | early chemistry experiments teach within the parameters then known,, the irony is now was then,, yet not until recently understood,, we taught of fire created by water upon contact,, the water dragon,, potassium nitrate guides the beligerent mind thus within an understanding of such,, as many reactions are simply mis-understood by the ''then unknown'' electrical design respects,, much love,, |
aether (OP) User ID: 34923382 United Kingdom 02/22/2013 03:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | a lot of mixed memory comes with that /z\ blame anger hate despair distrust revenge whoa quite a yucky emotional sensation Not sure I would utilize those particular emotions, but concern perhaps, at the very least... Kolbrin pg 11 Quoting: Seer777 The Appearance of the Destroyer God "Then came the day when all things became still and apprehensive, for God caused a sign to appear in the Heavens, so that men should know the Earth would be afflicted, and the sign was a strange star". "The star grew and waxed to a great brightness and was awesome to behold. It put forth horns and sang, being unlike any other ever seen. So men , seeing it, said among themselves, 'Surely, this is God appearing in the Heavens above us'. The star was not God, though it was directed by His design, but the people had not the wisdom to understand'. "Then God manifested Himself in the Heavens. His voice was as the roll of thunders and He was clothed with smoke and fire. He carried lightings in His hand and His breath, falling upon the Earth, brought forth brimstone and embers. His eye was a black void and His mouth an abyss containing the winds of Destruction. He encircled the whole of the Heavens, bearing upon His back a black robe adorned with stars". "Such was the likeness and manifestation of God in those days. Awesome was His countenance, terrible His voice of wrath, the sun and moon hid themselves in fear and there was a heavy darkness over the face of the Earth". i got not that abyss it was the abyss where you ask the question why would what comes out not conflict with god that abyss is what we are hovering over |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 865798 United States 02/22/2013 03:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun. Quoting: observationPerfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun? See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields? |
Seer777 Ride the wings of the mind User ID: 31248385 United States 02/22/2013 03:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i got not that abyss Quoting: aether it was the abyss where you ask the question why would what comes out not conflict with god that abyss is what we are hovering over Yes. Perhaps they are one and the same. Last Edited by Seer777 on 02/22/2013 03:20 PM Difficulties strengthen the Mind as labor does the body... ~Seneca |
aether (OP) User ID: 34923382 United Kingdom 02/22/2013 03:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i got not that abyss Quoting: aether it was the abyss where you ask the question why would what comes out not conflict with god that abyss is what we are hovering over Yes. Perhaps they are one and the same. yes what we are getting is earth side of the story and the emotions woven into our and Boitatá`s (abyss) emotions over a long linear period regarding that which keeps hurting us while it becomes our new to us god (planetary close encounter) so they are one of the same (cause) a lot of yuck emotions quite naturally arising from that long experience we`ll move past it |
Seer777 Ride the wings of the mind User ID: 31248385 United States 02/22/2013 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun. Quoting: observationPerfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun? See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields? That was one of the more beautiful things I have seen. Wonderful. Reminded me of a waterfall... Difficulties strengthen the Mind as labor does the body... ~Seneca |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19535695 United States 02/22/2013 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun. Quoting: observationPerfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun? See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields? wonder if this would apply in some way to that tho SS.. Curves in spacetime violate Heisenberg's uncertainty principle (a) A closed timelike curve, in which p2 is a chronology-respecting system, and p1 is a time-traveling system that can jump from point tA to the past point tB through a spacetime wormhole, has the ability to interact with itself in the past. (b) In an open timelike curve (OTC), the system cannot interact with itself in the past. In the new study, physicists have theoretically shown that OTCs can violate Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, provided p1 is entangled with p2. This proposal could be tested by performing experiments on entangled systems in Earth’s gravitational field. Credit: J. L. Pienaar, et al. ©2013 American Physical Society (Phys.org) —If an object traveling through spacetime can loop back in time in a certain way, then its trajectory can allow a pair of its components to be measured with perfect accuracy, violating Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. This new finding involves a particular trajectory called an open timelike curve (OTC), which is a special case of a closed timelike curve (CTC), a theoretical concept that has previously provoked controversy because it raises the possibility of traveling backwards in time. Read more at: [link to phys.org] |
aether (OP) User ID: 34923382 United Kingdom 02/22/2013 03:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun. Quoting: observationPerfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun? See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields? oh yes you feel sparky today |
nobody User ID: 34494410 United Kingdom 02/22/2013 03:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun. Quoting: observationPerfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun? See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields? wonder if this would apply in some way to that tho SS.. Curves in spacetime violate Heisenberg's uncertainty principle (a) A closed timelike curve, in which p2 is a chronology-respecting system, and p1 is a time-traveling system that can jump from point tA to the past point tB through a spacetime wormhole, has the ability to interact with itself in the past. (b) In an open timelike curve (OTC), the system cannot interact with itself in the past. In the new study, physicists have theoretically shown that OTCs can violate Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, provided p1 is entangled with p2. This proposal could be tested by performing experiments on entangled systems in Earth’s gravitational field. Credit: J. L. Pienaar, et al. ©2013 American Physical Society (Phys.org) —If an object traveling through spacetime can loop back in time in a certain way, then its trajectory can allow a pair of its components to be measured with perfect accuracy, violating Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. This new finding involves a particular trajectory called an open timelike curve (OTC), which is a special case of a closed timelike curve (CTC), a theoretical concept that has previously provoked controversy because it raises the possibility of traveling backwards in time. Read more at: [link to phys.org] some experienced remote viewers already achieve this in principal,, simply by using a fixed future event point,, interpretations with regards to closed circuits experiments with increased barium are relient only upon the rebound,, yet barium as a reflective of timing within such experiments,, is perhaps not the key,, much love,, |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19535695 United States 02/22/2013 03:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | some experienced remote viewers already achieve this in principal,, simply by using a fixed future event point,, Quoting: nobody 34494410 interpretations with regards to closed circuits experiments with increased barium are relient only upon the rebound,, yet barium as a reflective of timing within such experiments,, is perhaps not the key,, much love,, gives rise to the question of why they put barium in the chemtrails, and why we travel in reverse thru the zodiac... Have experienced a couple of time lapses this week and the speeding up of my clock once again in the last couple of weeks, it is now 53 mins fast ... groundhog day? the valley of the sine wave |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 865798 United States 02/22/2013 03:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun. Quoting: observationPerfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun? See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields? oh yes you feel sparky today I am feeling...sparky is a good word I suppose, lol. Been jumping around to different things all day, with work being the same. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19535695 United States 02/22/2013 03:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nobody User ID: 34494410 United Kingdom 02/22/2013 04:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Azeratel Axo User ID: 20063747 Canada 02/22/2013 04:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4022074 United States 02/22/2013 04:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Perfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun? See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields? oh yes you feel sparky today I am feeling...sparky is a good word I suppose, lol. Been jumping around to different things all day, with work being the same. Lol. I saw you ask what yes language was..on magestic thread |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 865798 United States 02/22/2013 04:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not only is the center of mass not an object,but it does not even have to lie inside an object. Notice that the center of mass for the solar system is not always inside the sun. It isn't now. So what that means, is that right now, the sun is curving around a point,outside of itself. In the curved space-time model, this orbit of the sun is caused by space being curved around the center of mass. But is space curved one way for mass, and another for light? No. So if Einstein was right, shouldn't light we see passing between the sun and center of mass, actually be bent towards the center of mass, and away from the sun. If I have not made a mistake here, this seems like more evidence for Dowdye's work. At least in his model, we should always have light bent towards the sun. Quoting: observationPerfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun? See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields? wonder if this would apply in some way to that tho SS.. Curves in spacetime violate Heisenberg's uncertainty principle (a) A closed timelike curve, in which p2 is a chronology-respecting system, and p1 is a time-traveling system that can jump from point tA to the past point tB through a spacetime wormhole, has the ability to interact with itself in the past. (b) In an open timelike curve (OTC), the system cannot interact with itself in the past. In the new study, physicists have theoretically shown that OTCs can violate Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, provided p1 is entangled with p2. This proposal could be tested by performing experiments on entangled systems in Earth’s gravitational field. Credit: J. L. Pienaar, et al. ©2013 American Physical Society (Phys.org) —If an object traveling through spacetime can loop back in time in a certain way, then its trajectory can allow a pair of its components to be measured with perfect accuracy, violating Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. This new finding involves a particular trajectory called an open timelike curve (OTC), which is a special case of a closed timelike curve (CTC), a theoretical concept that has previously provoked controversy because it raises the possibility of traveling backwards in time. Read more at: [link to phys.org] Hey Fringe. For some reason I am pulling away from 'time' related concepts like above. I think because I am not 'seeing' time like I use to. I think it is much more 'complex' then how we view it now, though simpler at the same time. I 'feel' as if time is...like consciousness and time are embedded together. Once they begin talking about 'time loops', then they are talking about non-material aspects...superluminal. If human waking consciousness were inside that time-loop, it would not be able to keep up with the processing of superluminal information/observation. Basically, it becomes almost dream-like and I would guess EXTREMELY hard to remember what took place, and possibly very difficult to discern exactly what happen when coming back to the NOW moment, whether it be 'backwards' in time or forward. It is my strong opinion that the concept of time has been misrepresented. It has been treated as a type of dimension, as if it could be separate from reality. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 865798 United States 02/22/2013 04:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 865798 United States 02/22/2013 04:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31036731 Canada 02/22/2013 06:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Perfect timing. See Rain-Man's post of the sun? See how the plasma is literally being pulled away from center to follow the invisible fields? wonder if this would apply in some way to that tho SS.. Curves in spacetime violate Heisenberg's uncertainty principle (a) A closed timelike curve, in which p2 is a chronology-respecting system, and p1 is a time-traveling system that can jump from point tA to the past point tB through a spacetime wormhole, has the ability to interact with itself in the past. (b) In an open timelike curve (OTC), the system cannot interact with itself in the past. In the new study, physicists have theoretically shown that OTCs can violate Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, provided p1 is entangled with p2. This proposal could be tested by performing experiments on entangled systems in Earth’s gravitational field. Credit: J. L. Pienaar, et al. ©2013 American Physical Society (Phys.org) —If an object traveling through spacetime can loop back in time in a certain way, then its trajectory can allow a pair of its components to be measured with perfect accuracy, violating Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. This new finding involves a particular trajectory called an open timelike curve (OTC), which is a special case of a closed timelike curve (CTC), a theoretical concept that has previously provoked controversy because it raises the possibility of traveling backwards in time. Read more at: [link to phys.org] Hey Fringe. For some reason I am pulling away from 'time' related concepts like above. I think because I am not 'seeing' time like I use to. I think it is much more 'complex' then how we view it now, though simpler at the same time. I 'feel' as if time is...like consciousness and time are embedded together. Once they begin talking about 'time loops', then they are talking about non-material aspects...superluminal. If human waking consciousness were inside that time-loop, it would not be able to keep up with the processing of superluminal information/observation. Basically, it becomes almost dream-like and I would guess EXTREMELY hard to remember what took place, and possibly very difficult to discern exactly what happen when coming back to the NOW moment, whether it be 'backwards' in time or forward. It is my strong opinion that the concept of time has been misrepresented. It has been treated as a type of dimension, as if it could be separate from reality. Time is contingent on the shape of space and the awareness of the data collecting device. Thus it is relative to the breadth and keeness of the relation. The gnostic bible calls it the state of fullness. After my nacho plate I am hyperexpanded. |
aether (OP) User ID: 34923382 United Kingdom 02/22/2013 06:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | just saw this Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34944405 Bumblebees Communicate with Flowers Via Electric Fields [link to www.scienceworldreport.com] "More recently though, it is being discovered that flowers take advantage of more and more of their pollinators' senses to send their messages Insects use several senses to forage, detecting floral cues such as color, shape, pattern, and volatiles. We report a formerly unappreciated sensory modality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris), detection of floral electric fields. These fields act as floral cues, which are affected by the visit of naturally charged bees. Like visual cues, floral electric fields exhibit variations in pattern and structure, which can be discriminated by bumblebees. We also show that such electric field information contributes to the complex array of floral cues that together improve a pollinator's memory of floral rewards. Because floral electric fields can change within seconds, this sensory modality may facilitate rapid and dynamic communication between flowers and their pollinators. Quoting: observation[link to www.sciencemag.org] our sciences are confirming non material structures further more they are confirming the non material structure of a soul/personality exists to be measured within an electric universe 2/10/2011 6:11 AM this /z\ is no longer the tricky topic it was of 2 years ago Last Edited by aether on 01/25/2014 09:25 AM |
aether (OP) User ID: 34923382 United Kingdom 02/22/2013 06:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nobody User ID: 34494410 United Kingdom 02/22/2013 06:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Seer777 Ride the wings of the mind User ID: 31248385 United States 02/22/2013 06:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i thought he said the language of the birds which is a another name for boyd bushmans language of mother nature The birds and the bees is it? lol. Difficulties strengthen the Mind as labor does the body... ~Seneca |
aether (OP) User ID: 34923382 United Kingdom 02/22/2013 06:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | just saw this Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34944405 Bumblebees Communicate with Flowers Via Electric Fields [link to www.scienceworldreport.com] "More recently though, it is being discovered that flowers take advantage of more and more of their pollinators' senses to send their messages Insects use several senses to forage, detecting floral cues such as color, shape, pattern, and volatiles. We report a formerly unappreciated sensory modality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris), detection of floral electric fields. These fields act as floral cues, which are affected by the visit of naturally charged bees. Like visual cues, floral electric fields exhibit variations in pattern and structure, which can be discriminated by bumblebees. We also show that such electric field information contributes to the complex array of floral cues that together improve a pollinator's memory of floral rewards. Because floral electric fields can change within seconds, this sensory modality may facilitate rapid and dynamic communication between flowers and their pollinators. [link to www.sciencemag.org] Quoting: observationour sciences are confirming non material structures further more they are confirming the non material structure of a soul/personality exists to be measured within an electric universe 2/10/2011 6:11 AM this /z\ is no longer the tricky topic it was of 2 years ago this will make more sense now c/f/s is charge, field and spin 8/5/2010 7:05 PM Your question will fly in the face of Out-of-body proponents...hah! That is why, once out of body during OBE's etc., the physical aspects of reality are malleable or distorted...with pineal and/or eyes, the vision remains 'true' to actual physical representation...they are the 'physical' receptors and 'antennae' that 'solidify' the vision for the human body to function in proper physicality with other humans... Quoting: septyes but what comes out? when i go out charge/field/spin (cfs) soul/personality leaves my body , i don`t need the antenna,/structure i`m self supporting autonomous aether accepted by aether cos we fit i get no distortions cos cfs in or out of the body is the same i`m functioning at femto speed and up matching my environment (aether) time does not exist to me because i am non material within the non material dimension Last Edited by aether on 01/25/2014 09:29 AM |
Seer777 Ride the wings of the mind User ID: 31248385 United States 02/22/2013 06:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aether (OP) User ID: 34923382 United Kingdom 02/22/2013 06:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 10/24/2010 2:23 PM so when the environmental changes caused by the golden age finally ceased and the remaining humans around the globe where interacting with unknown pulses (waves of information/energy)from our universe as we see know today but ,to our ancestors, a totally alien environment Quoting: aether the aether/field translates the interaction between them (ancestors) and it (universe) and neither had met each other before i`m getting a picture, earth is humanities life point within our magnetosphere, we form (born) here Quoting: aetherfor eternity to us, we lived within a stable environment of very different ingredients to the one we have lived within for several thousands of years when our past environment (golden age) was removed we and our earth were and are, within another environment but our magnetosphere and earth remain intact and the same shape because of the nature of form (birth) and reform (death) of our personalities/souls our ancestors essence/emotions/memories may remain within our magnetosphere to this day it`s not like trapped but it is because we/they have yet to come to terms with where we are and until we do, we will never satisfy either ourselves or them as to what happened when we know they know and when we all know, we are all okay i imagine Thread: Whats to Come Again...the lost and fallen will weep when we see what we have done, when we realize who we are... (Page 4) that was a good question you asked sept |