. That is electric fields have been observed to extend as far as we can measure them without termination, while magnetic fields always terminate on a nearby pole without exception.

I think that the relative size is a consideration. A north magnetic pole can be a uniform monopole of magnetic force if the object under consideration, inside the field established by it is small enough in comparison. The existence of the South Pole can be so far removed as to be irrelevant functionally and in terms of large scale differences in dimensions and the opposite pole virtually undetectable and irrelevant as far as local phenomena are concerned? The apparent dipole would seem and behave as a standing monopole field if the scale difference and location of the small perspective were large enough?

This makes me wonder that perhaps the chirality biases we observe are just the result of being located within a truly large overwhelming standing field. We are dominated by one standing field and not the other and have not the optics yet to see more deeply to provide an accurate perspective? Perhaps we only live as a microcosm in the vast magnetic monopole, which is yet only a half part of an even vaster magnetic dipole?

Magnetism could account for much?