X Marks the Spot

Are we really all made of stardust?
We are all made of stardust. It sounds like a line from a poem, but there is some solid science behind this statement too: almost every element on Earth was formed at the heart of a star.

Next time you’re out gazing at stars twinkling in the night sky, spare a thought for the tumultuous reactions they play host to. It’s easy to forget that stars owe their light to the energy released by nuclear fusion reactions at their cores. These are the very same reactions which created chemical elements like carbon or iron - the building blocks which make up the world around us.

After the Big Bang, tiny particles bound together to form hydrogen and helium. As time went on, young stars formed when clouds of gas and dust gathered under the effect of gravity, heating up as they became denser. At the stars’ cores, bathed in temperatures of over 10 million degrees C, hydrogen and then helium nuclei fused to form heavier elements. A reaction known as nucleosynthesis.

This reaction continues in stars today as lighter elements are converted into heavier ones. Relatively young stars like our Sun convert hydrogen to produce helium, just like the first stars of our universe. Once they run out of hydrogen, they begin to transform helium into beryllium and carbon. As these heavier nuclei are produced, they too are burnt inside stars to synthesise heavier and heavier elements. Different sized stars play host to different fusion reactions, eventually forming everything from oxygen to iron. [link to www.physics.org]

Plasma Cosmology vs the Big Bang (theory of how the universe came to be)? I don't see a reason for why both can not happen at the same time. There would be no vortex, swirl, plasma if there are no bang. The thinking of plasma materialize out of nowhere is weird. However, both contradict law of conservation. [link to www.thunderbolts.info]

Plasma cosmology has no theoretical beginning, the universe is of an unknown age and extent.
vs
Big Bang has a theoretical beginning, the universe has a known age and is limited in extent.

There could not be more difference, the theories are not reconcilable. [link to www.thunderbolts.info]

The big bang model is nonsense. Red shift theory has been falsified, and that takes big bang down with it. [link to www.thunderbolts.info]

I was briefly glancing through a book at my sister's house this past weekend.

One of the pages I flipped to said that God has a plan, and He manifested this plan when the Big Bang took place. It went on to say that the universe will end when God's plan is complete, and that it is stupidly naive to think that the universe is eternal, as it would mean God had nothing to 'complete'.

I lol'ed, and asked, "What is this shit?"

it get`s worse, all our faiths believe one way or another the universe is to be destroyed
imagine how that affects the underlying meaning to every adults unconscious thought
everything including them is destined by their gods will to be destroyed
how much will you really care what happens to anything when everything is walking dead

I was briefly glancing through a book at my sister's house this past weekend.

One of the pages I flipped to said that God has a plan, and He manifested this plan when the Big Bang took place. It went on to say that the universe will end when God's plan is complete, and that it is stupidly naive to think that the universe is eternal, as it would mean God had nothing to 'complete'.

I lol'ed, and asked, "What is this shit?"

How do you destroy nothing?

Infinity and the arc say the plan is complete before it even began.

How is anything judged but by that which it is not? delimiters

possess the same belief that believes something arises from nothing

i imagine

it`s nut`s to me

possess the same belief that believes something arises from nothing

i imagine

it`s nut`s to me

Me too. I've never felt that the universe will end.

Infinity and the arc say the plan is complete before it even began.

How is anything judged but by that which it is not? delimiters

Beautifully stated Dion.

my operative definition of nothing is perfect action. As imperfect action requires vindication through alliegences.

does the arc and infinity label eternity a plan
or is that human intervention into the unknown by them at this moment

i wonder

Sign sign everywhere a sign.

Not even after all the taquitos and shooters have been served?

'perfect'.

My operative definition of 'perfection' is that it is entirely dynamic and never fully attainable, as it would result in...nothing more.

my operative definition of nothing is perfect action. As imperfect action requires vindication through alliegences.

Say for instance the traumatizing events of 9/11.

Many, many, many people perceived that event beforehand.


For me, I began to perceive it about two weeks in advance which was normal for me at the time.


Once that event had been set in motion, as far as all the parts put in place with no foreseeable blockage, the event occurs.

The intention and will of the 'hijackers' was perceived by the sensitive. The rising of that devastating wave perceived.


For instance, the night before 9/11 I was sitting in a bar with my then new to me partner. The anxiety was so bad that I was literally shaking under the weight of it.

I was breathless from it.

I couldn't hold it in any longer...


I looked at him and said,

"Something terrible is about to happen...and it's going to change everything..."

Fucking up the scenery, breaking my mind.

'perfect'.

My operative definition of 'perfection' is that it is entirely dynamic and never fully attainable, as it would result in...nothing more.

conscious processes is velocity and feedback
conscious process is always quicker than what it is conscious of
that which is conscious process is structured (exists)
thus perfection is the quickest structure of all things
it knows what can never occur because it is to quick for what will never occur to occur
knowing what will never occur makes not knowing what may occur the motive for being
this is perfection

also if you wanna know how to create life just ask dr 2 balls

hahahahahahaha

constants

there are constants



velocity is a constant but nothing in our history/memory has recognized this officially yet
thus we can not fit it in today

eternity is a constant
how and why eternity is a constant answers why velocity is a constant to

Well, I stand corrected.

life does not need to be created! it simply is experianced!

We as creator are meerly taking what is already at our disposal and making it different. Even if we screw up our Dna it does not matter.

Well, maybe it does... after all its connected to the spirit.

Well it only matter in this reality... Meh.

our common reality is just is to teach us to dream!

Thus far, textbook descriptions of the speed of light assume that the light is traveling in a vacuum.

Space, however, is not a vacuum.

According to the Alpha Galileo Foundation, two new studies slotted for publication in the European Physical Journal D demonstrate that the speed of light is actually variable

The authors of the studies include March Urban of the University of Paris-Sud, along with Gerd Leuchs and Luis L. Sanchez-Soto from the Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Light in Erlangen, Germany.............................

perfect timing

New Studies Suggest the Speed of Light is Variable
Mar 25, 2013


[link to www.natureworldnews.com]