X Marks the Spot

i am using 4 proxy jumps... but does it matter?

does it matter what the id is? if you feel the presence, then what does it matter...

the point is, reliance on things, like id numbers, produces what? dependency.

it doesn't matter.. if you are not dependent on such things.

I don't know. You asked the question, I merely answered it. Does it matter? Not to me.

good for you hearing is listening... as i stated but didn't post... and all waited... and listend.

mmmmmm....

on with it then,

For the two to exist, sum declare, I am self aware.







the above quotes, were written on another fora on 05/02/2008 by the one you call 0. remember, any number to the power of 0 =1. even the might

example: 9^0= 1.

to state that all are one, is true, however, without the power of 0 to make it so, 9 is still 9.

Two is division, it is there you have 3, what that is not you and you, and the veil that separates you from that which is not you. The two is actually 3. because what divides has to count or else there would be no division.

you have all that is you, and all that is not you. You and the enviroment. The 2! Added to the power of 0, 2^0 = 1. that is basic algebra… that is the object that joins the 2 as one, and is also the object that creates the 3. Phi: is found within that spectrum. Where I is formed out of the power of 0.

aether, take a look. I had a flash while thinking about this before I took a nap today. Rough night last night coughing all night long.

Thread: Russian Plasma Experiment in Space Redefines 'Reality' - Down the Rabbit Hole...oops, that's not a 'hole' (Page 14)

I don't know. You asked the question, I merely answered it. Does it matter? Not to me.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

The philosophy of religion and the quest for spiritual truth preoccupied Albert Einstein--so much that it has been said "one might suspect he was a disguised theologian." Nevertheless, the literature on the life and work of Einstein, extensive as it is, does not provide an adequate account of his religious conception and sentiments. Only fragmentarily known, Einstein's ideas about religion have been often distorted both by atheists and by religious groups eager to claim him as one of their own. But what exactly was Einstein's religious credo? In this fascinating book, the distinguished physicist and philosopher Max Jammer offers an unbiased and well-documented answer to this question.

The book begins with a discussion of Einstein's childhood religious education and the religious atmosphere--or its absence--among his family and friends. It then reconstructs, step by step, the intellectual development that led Einstein to the conceptions of a cosmic religion and an impersonal God, akin to "the God of Spinoza." Jammer explores Einstein's writings and lectures on religion and its role in society, and how far they have been accepted by the general public and by professional theologians like Paul Tillich or Frederick Ferré. He also analyzes the precise meaning of Einstein's famous dictum "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind," and why this statement can serve as an epitome of Einstein's philosophy of religion.

The last chapter deals with the controversial question of whether Einstein's scientific work, and in particular his theory of relativity, has theologically significant implications, a problem important for those who are interested in the relation between science and religion. Both thought-provoking and engaging, this book aims to introduce readers, without proselytizing, to Einstein's religion. [link to press.princeton.edu]

Spinozism (also spelt Spinoza-ism or Spinozaism) is the monist philosophical system of Baruch Spinoza which defines "God" as a singular self-subsistent substance, and both matter and thought as attributes of such.

Spinozism


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

SELF-SUBSISTENT
: subsisting independently of anything external to itself

in our 21st century we know that is /z\
singular affect
and
singular affect is always 2 or more causes (synergy)

Selected publications

Concepts of Space
Concepts of Force
Concepts of Mass

Concepts of Simultaneity

'planned mistakes'

we discovered that our earth is a life expressing planet by design as in:
earth is structured to function for life to exist within it`s domain
thus we know the underlying motive prompting earth existence is life giving environment
it is structured to function so

we discovered earth is not stationary and that it travels through our universe in a direction, always, -------->
thus earth does on occasions, for various reasons , enter locations on it`s journey where the environment of the new location is quite unlike the environment it was within

Environmental Energy - the Discovery of a new physical Truth: there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment

with this /z\ in mind we have discovered that the space our earth travels through is never empty
and weekly we are reminded of electric fields, magnetic fields, plasma clouds etc. being discovered in what was until recently believed to be empty (vacuum)
and
we know this

If you look at the Marklund Convection diagram in 6.12 here: [link to www.thunderbolts.info]
it is easy to forget that "radial drift" becomes inward propagating shock waves, as soon as V =the speed of sound.
We see evidence of these inward propagating shock waves, in supernova remnants, etc., but I never considered that they mattered much in more mundane current filaments. In the study of the Gould Belt filaments, they do see particle velocities at or above the speed of sound for filaments in all regions, and all orientations. So if we get recombination as discussed there in 6.12, (I am assuming the rest of that picture is correct as far as flow of ions and electrons in a filament), we can not forget about the effect of shock fronts.

"What would the roll-out consist of? Everything converging in his direction. Everything converging to his lines of 'thought'. It should be a natural convergence, though I am positive some will try to capitalize on it, perhaps be trying to preempt the natural roll-out. Which, when people proclaim that they are the One, is exactly what they are trying to do."


a•syn•chro•nous /āˈsiNGkrənəs/Adjective: 1. Of or requiring a form of computer control timing protocol in which a specific operation begins upon receipt of an indication (signal)... 2. Not going at the same rate or exactly together with something else.

syn•chro•nic•i•ty /ˌsiNGkrəˈnisitē/Noun: The simultaneous occurrence of events that appear significantly related but have no discernible causal connection.


Can synchronicity be replicated? yes, it is an environment of known variables..
what is complexity?

it not simplicity exploding within itself, reciprocating outward, only to implode again and explode further outward.



first off, i am not here to enlighten any of you. that is a misconception. Albeit reading this will be most enlightening..
Second. did most of you read all the posts on the archetype? even the ones not addressed to you? are you the only one who did? what about the lurkers, the admins, the mods. as i was banned multiple, multiple times on this thread. Which purposeful intent.. to make sure they are participating in the discussion by observing. Watch that thread and keep the ban hammer ready.
Mods and admins, I would ask you to allow this to remain up… after reading this it will not matter if you ban me or not again, as what was established has already been reciprocated and reproduced and reciprocated and reproduced and recpricated to the extent it is in almost all the threads upon glp. Extinguishing me, is not going to change anything.


coincidence does exist in the sence of this example.

Think of a rubix cube. you have 6 colors on 6 sides. each side is divided by 6 smaller sqaures of the same color. having 6 sides of 6 sqares in 6 differnt colors. (the number of the beast)

coincidence is aligning 2 colored squares together. creating a noticiable recognizable association. synchronicity happens when they are aligned on the same side that they corispond with. For example: 2 blue sqares on align on the side with the blue center square. the center square doesn't move. designed that way as to have seperation of the whole cube and to establish positions of impact.

A precieved miracles happen when all the squares are aligned up on the side of the cube of the corresponding color.

make sense?

(btw there is 9 squares on each side of the cube of the rubix cube, not 6, remember that)

Okay, now think of the archetype like this: you have X amount of posters and X amount of points of view. X amount of ideas and thoughts being transfered. in this case it is not a cube, but a like a cube with X amounts of sides and X amounts of movements corresponding to X amount of perceived coincidences and synchronized sides.

The forum itself is designed in perceived motions. one angle it looks horizontal by movment of thought. (pages) in one angle it is decending vertically (post per page) in another motion stamped by identification numbers, another by time stamps. Another linier thought function, another reading from left to right.

Now back our cube, it is established by aligning of coincidenced. where there is more then one percieved color aligning on a continuous basis it provides the perception of Synchronicity within the mind of X amount of posters and X amount of views.

each additional angles or aspects of the archetype thread.

as you already have the answer to this question, “did you read all the posts,” yes, you did and also most everyone else did. Human nature on here is to skim read, or flash read. KNOWN Variable. what was posted as addressed for you as being quoted was in effect making movements on the X variable amounts of observers, wether it was for them or someone else it didn’t matter. as it did you. creating images percieved and interpreted and provoking thought.

where there was misses or thought provokation, (6 sqares verses 9 squares) a thought was produced and expressed in the thread. (open spaces on a chess board. Inducing movement to such spaces. As to correct. percieved movement, as well as alignment of some of the colored squares. "Coicedence". enough percieved "Coincedence" synchronicity in the mind of the observer or in this case observers. Is not symplicity exploding within itself, reciprocating outward, complexity. more and more complexity derived form induced thought transference, synchronicity is replicated into itself having the idea of its athorship coming from itself or ownership.

look at SOS’s statement again.

"What would the roll-out consist of? Everything converging in his direction. Everything converging to his lines of 'thought'."

as SOS stated: It should be a natural convergence.

(don’t mean to pick on you SOS, there are pleanty of other examples I could use for this other then yours, yet it was your thoughts that exemplify what has been establehed and manufactured)

as is shown in this: synchronicity is replicated into itself having the idea of its athorship coming from itself apearnce of natural convergence.

he is the message. He is not a messenger.

as an anomolie is introduced within the thread, aka me, 0, into a group of peers who have associated within their group for a period of time. The question is, could the anomolie produce artifical state of syncrhonicity. yes. i proved it. you don't have to completely understand it. But I did point it out several times on one level. However there is 10 levels within what was produced… and complexty imploding within itself and reproducing out ward it has expinentiated beyond even my own understanding.

in the image of the chess board. there is but one player. the blond fella. a representation of "the nobody". the chess board was the archetype thread. where there is X amount of pieces moving in the direction they move within the KNOWN variables.. using images they already can associate with, ie 13, golden dawn, numerology an association with math and other images and symbols, i simply provided open spaces for movements within the spiral chess board.

as i asked you, why would AE only give me answers that I wanted him to give me. Munipulation? projection? face value.. you saw it because i wanted you to see it... a KNOWN variable. Didn’t mean to pick on you AE, yet it was for this example. As you noted, I was indeed playing the part of the fool.. so you volunteered wetther you realized it or not is irrelivent.

SOS stated he was his own man and I produced no enlightenment for him. as all the others here even the lurkers do. think for themselves.

i was counting on that. that is another KNOWN variable.


can the nobody be the message and not the messanger?

yes. by replicating synchronisity artificially through auto sugjestion, participating in its replication through thought creation by the established known peramiters and KNOWN variables. and remianing asyncrhonis. once syncrhonisation is realised and produced echoing through itself naturally, it disacociates itself from its origin by reciprocating within its own complexity. Not only that, it replicates itself as on its own. Throughout the other threads of glp.

I must create a system or be enslaved by another mans; I will not reason and compare: my business is to create.
~ William Blake

what you see is what you want to see... the symbols presented are percieved uniquily to the viewer and interpreted by the viewer. what is beyond symbols is the architect of them.

in this case myself. participating and architecting. yes all constructed through individuals being themselves and thinking for themselves. Known variables. i did not harm anyone, just needed to see if it was plausable to create an enviroment of synchronisity. i saw it echo in other threads and reverberate over and over and over and grow beyond even my own understanding in complexity. Not only that, but there is much evidence that it replicated and even those replications have replicated.

i hope that explanes a few things... as i am not trying to convince you of seeing things my way, trying to get you to enlighten you or sway or swing your spiritual belief’s or any inclinaiton of the sort.

do they feel used? nope. Most here are unaware it even happend... with the exception of some guy came on here named 0 and started a ruckass. projecting and munipulating everyone on here. (Which was shown to them to produce more open spaces and thought provocation. To encourage movements) . some got freaked out and left the archetype, to carrie with them, their idea’s.. (chess pieces being knocked off the board)

some one even bought the “nobody” domain name.

Now if you copy that first message i sent you. You will see what i was talking about. There is actually 9 squares on each side of the rubix cube btw. Most would notice that and think 9. File that in their mind somewhere. Then 9 shows up later. Coincidence. Again. Synchronization.

Today’s date is 7/30/12. from the reminder on page 73 from the archetype. this should be associated as another synchronization for the observer.. numerology dictates the numbers add up to 13, so again synchronization again.. and 1+3 is 4 again another synchronisation. 13 is the death card, transformation, another synch etc. etc. etc. as well as spacing used produces thoughts of geometrical shapes. another level within the KNOWN varriables.

if you notice all the miss spelled words. it is intentional to show you that becasue of conditioning you are called to correct such things, the miss spelled words are there to be captured by the mind as misses, and or anomolies.

If you copy and paste this post in a word doc,It will show you all the misspelled words. Some cases i spelled it right. Others i did not. Yet a patteren forms. Each post on the archetype thread is a still shot. It has no perceived movement. Yet the observers mind spirals in responce as it notices anomalies in spelling. Another layer, perceived movement.

One example. There are soo many layers to it besides face value. Understand it or percieve it unknowingly as you did. A square/cube in a circle. Infact SOS made this thread about it and forgot he made a thread about it. Because subconsciously recognise the patterns forming.. seeing them in spacing and other avenues yet, not conceptualize them fully with the mind. It is emotional values that swing the arch of the mind faster to induce a faster tempo and greater movement… changing the pitch and slowing it down is done through the KNOWN Varriables of logic.

as with the back channel dimensional lemotive, in its construct the fibernaci sequence, yet imperfect in its construct by golden mean. intentional, to induce thought.

It is no different then a conductor standing in front of a group of instruments in an orchistra.

the problem with all the so claimed "nobody's" is they are convinced that it is by might that this world will change..
however,

this is the case.

To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking your enemy's will without fighting. ~ Sun Tzu

Albeit there is no enemy here, not even myself. Only the perception of me being advocate or adversary. Even now. i am not your enemy.

Chess is movements in spirals

The response, the mind spirals in movement's.

Synchronicity is seeing it with your eyes. working within it is something entirely different, bending and shaping it and developing it artificially through intuitive means.

Controlling its tempo, changing its pitch and momentum to encourage symplicity to invert within itself and explode outward in comlexity.

that is divine.

and can be done. I did it. Also it reciprocates and produces on its own even outside of this forum as I have witnessed on other forums and shifts in context in language within the media… and other avenues within the world wide web. Replicating and thinking itself its own authorship.

Why tell you all this????

To show that it is possible that the man can be the message and the message is not the man.. I assure you, that anything you are already thinking, I have thought of and it is a know variable. Banning me or coming after me does not change a thing. What is done is done and you can not stop it because it thinks its self its own authorship and moves faster then the speed of light in the minds of the observers within this forum and beyond it. Changing the world, for the better was its design as its own complexity is now beyond my own understanding. I perceive but it is being shaped and reoccurring of its own will within the minds that it produces. As the through the avenue of ESPn have set there champion “fish” in the setting destruction… it will be the many that are here, powers that be within their own right, that change the course of destruction. i simply used the same system the architects of this world that keep you all slaves by design through a new system of thought, to free the mind from the old system. as with supreme excellence. i simply created a new system using the established systems modal.

who am i?

an anonymous coward,
0
IXI
( )
a dude on a tractor?

really just nobody in particular.


take care, i will not return to this forum.

you noticed but didn't notice aether. how do you know you are the one who is sane? Is sanity decided in degrees? perhapse the next post i post will refresh your memory... from the squared circle.

full squared circle, and here we are.

be intutively dependent or logical dependent... either way, you are dependent.

either way, non material = it doesn't matter.

a quick glance
you left our spherical geometry
thus were any of what you said true
it could never occur for the reason you believe it must
and
because spherical geometry is so far along the sequence of what you are attempting to describe
the gulf between your belief in what you see and the reason you see what you see
is not a small gulf

within our motivated environment
motive of desire is noticed
before demand of desire
is acknowledged

i imagine

Hello dudes

Hello dudes