X Marks the Spot

Ears ringing.

Like the Double Slit experiment?


[link to www.youtube.com]

I propose a simple alteration to the experiment, because it has become quite clear that the empirical scientist has failed to account for the apparent SOUND waves that have been present in their laboratories when they started opening slits and bouncing light off mirrors...
They failed to perform a proper exorcism and create a laboratory that was like the vacuum, they failed to recreate the vacuum that they proposed was in outer space.
With their primitive detection equipment they could not detect the luminiferous aether/plasma/dark matter/dark energy, this has become apparently true.
Chandra can and does. Newer technology often trumps older technology.
True in optics and SOUND.
I am calling bullshit on ALL those 'light' experiments, that have ignored the role of SOUND. [link to www.thunderbolts.info]

lol

2008





touchy topic

Well, the point being the 'observer' changed the 'result'.

Are photons conscious? I think they might be.

:)

Well, the point being the 'observer' changed the 'result'.

Are photons conscious? I think they might be.

:)

that is just becoming lawful to say
they must be conscious
this we know
and
we know they are conscious of what they are conscious within
thus
their motivation and the motivation of what they are conscious within prompts synergy that matches their motives
their synergy is the reason their motives match
they both enjoy what it feels to be themselves

photons
and all that is not photon

that is just becoming lawful to say
they must be conscious
this we know
and
we know they are conscious of what they are conscious within
thus
their motivation and the motivation of what they are conscious within prompts synergy that matches their motives
their synergy is the reason their motives match
they both enjoy what it feels to be themselves

photons
and all that is not photon

thus to an observer
that notices photons
we may see it could be useful
to inquire
what photons
and
all that is not photons
were doing
before the observer intersected
via observation

The photons changed their behavior while being 'watched'. Seems to me, that only leads to one conclusion.

Perhaps they are shy.

that is just becoming lawful to say
they must be conscious
this we know
and
we know they are conscious of what they are conscious within
thus
their motivation and the motivation of what they are conscious within prompts synergy that matches their motives
their synergy is the reason their motives match
they both enjoy what it feels to be themselves

photons
and all that is not photon

On another note...I think all this Sunshine is leading to a decrease in appetite again.

I weighed myself yesterday and found I have unfortunately lost the 3lbs I gained.

Time for pizza.

awwwwww
cautious
feels similar
and
would you express caution when noticed by peoples imagination
i am

Would you prefer?

I have never, NOT felt 'watched'.

It doesn't bother me, as I accepted it at a young age.

Do you think it is a part as to why you think you can see?

[link to www.thunderbolts.info]

The above quoted conclusions of DarSarma gains extra credence if we assume Earth was originally bathed in the blue-red light spectrum of a brown dwarf star - thus facilitating this purple hued arrangement as vegetation’s original condition. All that remains for mainstream science is to find a model in which the current Sun's light was once sufficiently filtered to allow the purple-hued element in plants to become predominant - a problem solved if we 'simply' swap the Sun for a brown dwarf.

Also, and this is what sold the red vegetation concept to me, we still see purple-hued vegetation on Earth, mostly in the filtered environment of the oceans’ depths where red-coloured seaweeds and coral abound and the light spectrum approaches that of a brown dwarf. For those looking to get a hint at what kind of atmosphere enveloped the Earth under Saturn, an ocean dive down to about 15 feet will approximate the purplish gloom experienced by early humans.

"Studies have thus indicated that "the colour of a planet's photosynthetic organisms depend on the type of star the world orbits and the make up of its atmosphere." What this means is that if trees grow on other planets their leaves might be anything but green. Take red and brown dwarf stars, for instance, both of which give off less visible light. Any plants growing on planets associated with them, according to Nancy King of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, might even be black. And while it has been voted "the least likely plant colour on any planet", under certain conditions, even blue could be possible." [link to www.thunderbolts.info]

Do you think it is a part as to why you think you can see?

Left ear.

mine last night was a long tone
spot on
left

ever heard a radio station in your ear?

A Thousand Plateaus