X Marks the Spot

(+3)----(+2)---(+1)----(pi)-------0--------(phi)----(-1)----​(-2)--------(-3)


:E8BlankLie:


I'll need to work on the spacing

Perhaps it can be summed as woman recognizing inherent value of her own body

Whereas man only sees his own body in a utilitarian sense, and considers aesthetics as an extension of utilitarianism of the body

Tell me pi.

Or rather,

1 + 1 = 3.

But,

Can 1 + 1 = 0 as well?



Better yet....

can 1 + 1 = pi?

I am trying to figure that out.

No.

Women sees inherent VALUE in nurturing. Growth. Progression.


And HAS... for a long as 'female' has graced this planet, watched her sons KILL each other.

And worse...


Speaking of, I stumbled on the the Book of Nod two night ago.
[link to www.scribd.com]


Caine and Able...

Caine first born, kills his beloved brother.

Why?

I thought you said pi=3?

I put it between...

101

or lol

or IOI

=3

but also =1 <--- new 'thing'

:)

So you think the difference is two?

Only problem is growth. We spiral outwards, do we not?

As I explained earlier, 1 does not stay 1, and it is not as though we require a partner for growth.

That is, the 'push-pull' can still function without a dance partner...

Perhaps it is not at full potential, but nonetheless, growth occurs....

Waiting for the day we meet her, as it were.

Not sure what you mean there.



I see it like this.

Perhaps the other '1' is hiding behind it...

Perfect

That is precisely what I mean

A fully 3D structure

Imagine 3 'veils' to the front and to the back

Does that make sense?

I hate numbers.

It's what I am often talking about...


The space between.

In thought.

In action.

Here<-------->There


The fulcrum.

Correct?



There are 3 in this picture...But there is also 1.

How about:

Peahen vs. Peacock

One sex is clearly putting much vaster effort into growth outwards

But they are not the ones that decide the competition outcome

Perfect

That is precisely what I mean

A fully 3D structure

Imagine 3 'veils' to the front and to the back

Does that make sense?

I hate numbers.

Well...apparently the 'peahen' has selected for display of 'feather beauty'. As...the song of the peacock is not very appealing.


The male is driven by impulse to breed...

And the female selects the strongest suitor.

So goes Nature...


[link to www.youtube.com]

In certain ocean fish (damselfish spring to mind) it is reversed

But it is difficult to find examples beyond that

Damsel fish?




Have you ever had the unpleasantness of keeping damsel fish in your tank?

Mine was so aggressive, it killed...everything. And so fast I could never catch it. To get it out.

Eventually, I had to remove every piece of live rock out of my tank to fish it out.

My tomato clown as well. Between the two of them, they probably cost me hundreds in fish, invertebrates, and such.

I kept them with things like triggerfish and tangs

You must have had a large tank. Mine is small.

A 'mini reef'.

25 gallon.

Still going though. After all these years. 12 at least.

:)

You shoukd take pictures sometime

I still have most of my old ones

Just to get the feel of it

Corals too?

I could do that. :)


I never had the money for the expensive lighting. I built my own at the time...out of a DIY kit. I was in college.

I have 2 55 watt compact florescent on 25 gallon tank.


I have had the best success with anemones, polyps, and mushrooms over the years.

[link to www.nano-reef.com]

I once had nine bubbletip anemones

Gave them all away when I shut down the tank.

I loved them. They were enormous. Like a foot across.

I had three. Started as one. The biggest was 7in or so across.

I lost them during the storms in January of 2012. I was at the beach house. And the power went off here.

In in the middle of winter.

For who knows how long. I was gone for a month.


An anemone, my polyps, and mushrooms survived. Now they have have taken over the tank.

It is ALL purple mushrooms and florescent green polyps.

And one anemone.

My first.

Which still holds.

:)


I will sleep now.

nn pi.

Sleep well when you go.

A University of Michigan press release announces “warped space-time” around a so-called “neutron star”. Could electricity provide a better explanation?

The smeared lines of an iron spectrum have given NASA and University of Michigan astronomers another mystery to solve when it comes to explaining the universe. Using the XMM-Newton and the JAXA/NASA X-ray observatories, high-velocity particles in orbit around Serpens X-1 seem to indicate relativistic effects. According to Sudip Bhattacharyya of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center:

“This is fundamental physics. There could be exotic kinds of particles or states of matter, such as quark matter, in the centers of neutron stars, but it’s impossible to create them in the lab. The only way to find out is to understand neutron stars.”...................

...............If we continue to invent ad hoc conjectures to save theories that do not directly explain new observations, then we will never discover the true nature of the Universe.

Serpens ("the Serpent", ) is a constellation of the northern hemisphere.

It is unique among the modern constellations in being split into two non-contiguous parts, Serpens Caput (Serpent's Head) to the west and Serpens Cauda (Serpent's Tail) to the east. Between these two halves lies the constellation of Ophiuchus, the "Serpent-Bearer". In figurative representations, the body of the serpent is represented as passing behind Ophiuchus between &#956; Ser in Serpens Caput and Ser in Serpens Cauda. The brightest star in Serpens is Unukalhai or Cor Serpentis "Serpent's Heart"

Aratus describes the constellation as follows:

Both [hands of Ophiuchus] firmly clutch the Serpent, which encircles the waist of Ophiuchus, but he, steadfast with both his feet well set, tramples a huge monster, even the Scorpion, standing upright on his eye and breast. Now the Serpent is wreathed about his two hands – a little above his right hand, but in many folds high above his left. ... Toward the Crown leans the Serpent’s jaw, but beneath his coiling form seek thou for the mighty Claws [Libra][4]

There were two "serpent" constellations in Babylonian astronomy, known as Muspam uspamspamu and Baspammu. It appears that Muspam ;uspamspamu was depicted as a hybrid of dragon, lion and bird, and loosely corresponds to Hydra. Baspammu was a horned serpent (c.f. Ningishzida) and loosely corresponds to the constellation of Eudoxus of Cnidus on which the (Serpens) of Ptolemy is based