X Marks the Spot

yes i should sleep, it was a buzz which, in the right company , it was the right buzz
not being in the right company the buzz become a mood block to everything so i have done nothing but loon around doing nothing

i got water now, i was drinking tea that sucks
vortical, no corners/angles , every rounded , i like the feel of that

Not a good time to focus on email then.

why woulf you build something with no angles , you round the edges where they meet cos you can and it makes you feel better
why does it make you feel better, cos you thoughts dont get "caught" in corners and angles thus remain as round as you thought them
now that`s a room

and if nature never travels in a straight line, always spirals from a to b because it takes no energy to get from a to b when you spiral cos there is always a spiral there to carry your "load" (thought)
and because there are not gaps your thought is carried within the thought that there is no gap within thus your thought is seen to move
cos
it is trnamitted by the thought that fills all space and because you are never all that is not you, it is your thought that is tramitted (visible), because all else knows what it is doing thus your thought becomes the thought noticed, by all that is not you ,thus visible in where it goes and what it does

i feel better for saying that

Interesting that comes up as I was thinking about said saying, yesterday.

'No straight lines in Nature'...


Is this true? Because honeycomb in composted of straights lines...

As are snowflakes
[link to www.its.caltech.edu]
[link to www.its.caltech.edu]

Molecules.


Spine of a leaf...

and if nature never travels in a straight line, always spirals from a to b because it takes no energy to get from a to b when you spiral cos there is always a spiral there to carry your "load" (thought)

Interesting that comes up as I was thinking about said saying, yesterday.

'No straight lines in Nature'...


Is this true? Because honeycomb in composted of straights lines...

As are snowflakes
[link to www.its.caltech.edu]
[link to www.its.caltech.edu]

Molecules.
:Portrait of a Mo:

Spine of a leaf...
:WaterPearls:


:phi:

seems to be a motion thing

Interesting that comes up as I was thinking about said saying, yesterday.

'No straight lines in Nature'...


Is this true? Because honeycomb in composted of straights lines...

As are snowflakes
[link to www.its.caltech.edu]
[link to www.its.caltech.edu]

Molecules.


Spine of a leaf...

I see a hexagon, and a pinnate.

No 'straight lines'.... they truly are abhorrent.



Good afternoon everyone, just popping in to say hi

You can make all shapes with triangles

and if nature never travels in a straight line, always spirals from a to b because it takes no energy to get from a to b when you spiral cos there is always a spiral there to carry your "load" (thought)
and because there are not gaps your thought is carried within the thought that there is no gap within thus your thought is seen to move
cos
it is trnamitted by the thought that fills all space and because you are never all that is not you, it is your thought that is tramitted (visible), because all else knows what it is doing thus your thought becomes the thought noticed, by all that is not you ,thus visible in where it goes and what it does

i feel better for saying that

:HexagonsE8:

That is why the natives say 'be straight as an arrow' and the, I think western saying, 'follow the straight and narrow'. An arrow goes from point a to point b but spirals as it is traveling. From feather to chert.

And the height and form of the feather controlls the vortex. Lower profile the tighter the vortex created for the arrow in flight:-)

Well worth a watch , even if you know about these things.





:lkmid:

Pinnate refers to feather-like or multi-divided features arising from both sides of a common axis.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]



:)

And the height and form of the feather controlls the vortex. Lower profile the tighter the vortex created for the arrow in flight:-)

I've read that if one could build an object that could span across the entire Universe, that it would become the object around which time enwraps itself.

The stated 'application' given was to use the object as a maypole, circling around it, until eventually, one will actually come up behind oneself, having traveled backwards in time.

I've always thought that a curious concept.

Where is the longest 'line', anyways?

I've read that if one could build an object that could span across the entire Universe, that it would become the object around which time enwraps itself.

The stated 'application' given was to use the object as a maypole, circling around it, until eventually, one will actually come up behind oneself, having traveled backwards in time.

I've always thought that a curious concept.

Where is the longest 'line', anyways?

we are not certain as yet
what we know is this
a structure can be constructed and the field (s) within the structure prompt the above
we also notice that when construct structures to form fields, like rodin coils, they cause a field effect outside of their structure which seems able to cause similar effects to the effects prompted within the structures mentioned above
structure and function can never be separated true
but it seems the same ingredients become different effects (functions) dictated by the design of the structure they function within
thus we know we can take our 0 point energy field/higgs bosen/aether , call it what we may it comes out as charge/current and dependent on the structure we design it causes varying field effects
it seems with our ancient global structures they combined indigenous materials/ingredients into designed structures that prompted synergy with our environment in similar fashion to people like tesla describe in their published writings

Did you see this video yet? Is win!

Does the maypole bend around to meet itself? How would one come up behind oneself...unless once one reaches the end, the balance shifts the other way, sending said back in the direction they came.

I am picturing a 'toy' here I can not quite place.



The Transcontinental Railroad?
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

The Maypole epitomizes the spirit of the religions that prevailed in northern Europe before Christianity was adopted and provides an ideal test case for the methodology employed in a comparative study of myth and ritual.

The annual festival of cutting down the Maypole tree in the forest and setting it up in the town square has survived in some places and was revived in countless others, mostly in southern Germany, northeastern France, and western Czechia. But unfortunately, despite the resilience of the symbol, as little is known about the Maypole’s origins and symbolism as of the lost Germanic religions themselves.

It is imperative for all scholarly theories to distinguish rigorously between two processes of reasoning, known as induction and deduction, with corresponding “bottom-up” and “top-down” approaches to data. While the results suggested through deductive analysis often square nicely with those obtained through inductive analysis, intellectual stalemate is reached at other times. The Maypole, as well as its colleague, the Christmas tree, and countless other aspects of post-medieval folk tradition, exemplifies such an impasse.

A careful historian of religion adhering to a bottom-up approach to his research collects as much data as possible on Maypole festivities then draws his or her conclusions based on these findings alone, working backwards in time. He or she finds that the Maypole has not been attested any earlier than the late Middle Ages and vanishingly little information survives regarding the function or significance of the symbol.

Just what was the Maypole meant to signify? The inductive thinker reaches a dead end and, erring on the side of caution, is bound to describe the Maypole as a recent folklore item of uncertain origins and uncertain meaning...............