| Users Online Now: 2,213 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,138,691 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,901,620 | Threads Today: 788 | Posts Today: 13,669 |
| 06:29 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,213 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,138,691 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,901,620 | Threads Today: 788 | Posts Today: 13,669 |
| 06:29 PM | ||
Post-Fukushima, Japan's irradiated fish worry B.C. experts/ the so called "Reality"! | |
| the mighty Atom Offer Upgrade  User ID: 19556852  Japan07/20/2012 02:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Post-Fukushima, Japan's irradiated fish worry B.C. experts Are fish from the Pacific Ocean and Japanese coastal and inland waters safe to eat 16 months after the Fukushima nuclear disaster? Governments and many scientists say they are. But the largest collection of data on radiation in Japanese fish tells a very different story. In June, 56 percent of Japanese fish catches tested by the Japanese government were contaminated with ce-sium-137 and -134. (Both are human-made radioactive isotopes—produced through nuclear fission—of the element cesium.) And 9.3 percent of the catches exceeded Japan’s official ceiling for cesium, which is 100 becquerels per kilogram (Bq/kg). (A becquerel is a unit of radioactivity equal to one nuclear disintegration per second.) Radiation levels remain especially high in many species that Japan has exported to Canada in recent years, such as cod, sole, halibut, landlocked kokanee, carp, trout, and eel. Of these species, cod, sole, and halibut, which are oceanic species, could also be fished by other nations that export their Pacific Ocean catch to Canada. The revelations come from the Japanese Fisheries Agency’s radiation tests on almost 14,000 commercial fish catches in both international Pacific and Japanese waters since March 11, 2011, when an earthquake and tsunami triggered multiple meltdowns at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. The wrecked plant spewed enormous amounts of radiation into the Pacific, where cesium levels near the Fukushima coast shot up to an astonishing 45 million times the pre-accident levels. Japan’s Fisheries Agency data is easily the most comprehensive on Fukushima’s radioactive impacts on the Pacific Ocean, home to the world’s biggest fishery and a major food source for more than a billion people. The numbers show that far from dissipating with time, as government officials and scientists in Canada and elsewhere claimed they would, levels of radiation from Fukushima have stayed stubbornly high in fish. In June 2012, the average contaminated fish catch had 65 becquerels of cesium per kilo. That’s much higher than the average of five Bq/kg found in the days after the accident back in March 2011, before cesium from Fukushima had spread widely through the region’s food chain. In some species, radiation levels are actually higher this year than last. The highest cesium level in all of the catches came in March—a year after the accident—when a landlocked masu salmon caught in a Japanese river was found to have a whopping 18,700 becquerels of cesium per kilogram—or 187 times Japan’s ceiling. Burnaby MD Tim Takaro says he now avoids eating fish from the vicinity of Japan. “I would find another source for fish if I thought it was from that area,” said Takaro, an associate professor in Simon Fraser University’s faculty of health sciences. “There are way too many questions and not enough answers to say everything is fine,” Takaro said in a phone interview. “There is a need for monitoring. There isn’t any question in my mind about that.” Please read the whole Article, good Source: [link to www.straight.com] Fear make you sick, like Radiation  Last Edited by the mighty Atom on 07/20/2012 02:08 AM G.Y.!B.E. |
| the mighty Atom (OP) User ID: 19556852 Japan07/20/2012 02:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Canadians are crazy, they eat food up to 1.000Bq. a Kg! This is really mad, stupid, can't understand why they don;t change it! For example, Canada’s ceiling for radiation is set at a level that allows 5,000 to 8,000 cancers per million people over a 70-year lifetime of exposure, according to Health Canada’s models and those of a landmark 2006 U.S. National Academy of Sciences report on cancer risk from radiation. (About half of the cancers would be fatal.) Source: [link to www.straight.com]  Last Edited by the mighty Atom on 07/20/2012 02:10 AM G.Y.!B.E. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19079034  Canada07/20/2012 02:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| the mighty Atom (OP) User ID: 19556852 Japan07/20/2012 02:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Authorities in Canada dismiss the calls for monitoring. “Not involved, not involved,” said Tom Kosatsky, the B.C. Centre for Disease Control’s acting medical director of environmental health services, when asked about monitoring of radiation in Pacific fish. G.Y.!B.E. |
| the mighty Atom (OP) User ID: 19556852 Japan07/20/2012 05:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 9151175 Canada07/20/2012 05:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 19079034 Canada07/26/2012 05:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
