Re-confirmed — Colorado shooter James Holmes part of Occupy movement

Borat...was he gay too? You might as well have this guy be the ultimate epitome of your unbridled hate.

Well Mr. Borat, I think you and I have finally found a point that we agree on, lol

T. for Trinity, perhaps?

haha... I tricked the tricky trickster, if so!

ask an occupier, and last I checked in our countries of residence descent is a civil liberty.

T. as in T-Dot lol

.


And yet this Occupier was on a federal grant, federal student
loans, and Unemployment checks.

It was like feeding a monster with our own flesh.


.

You know what this guy needed. Military or some organization with lots of mentors.

Lot of mentors available in the military. They can replace a missing or distant father.

A lot of this stuff in his chart sounds spot on.

Last Edited by Xerxes on 07/22/2012 12:34 PM

So he leaves occupy because "They weren't radical enough" for him, after he went to tea party rallies.....but he was "turned" by the occupy movement?

So you have taken a tragedy and rather then focusing on the victims and what we can do to prevent this from happening again by ways of learning the signs to someone who is mentally unstable and creating better safety nets and programs for the mentally ill but instead.....you do this?

Like I said before if you can prove he was an occupier for some time, big fucking deal. It doesn't speak mountains of character or any other point other then politically he gave a fuck and was willing to reach out to different groups and attempt to do something. It's too bad HE was a fucked up INDIVIDUAL. Until you get your head around that you are no better then the scum on MSM with this bullshit.

Seriously you should be ashamed and embarrassed by trying to make such a connection.

.


Canada tore down the last Occupy camp back in January.


.

I realize that all this time you were just trolling for funs, Borat.

Or is it?

.



And instead, his mentors were Liberal college professors.

Thus, there's little surprise he turned to the Occupy movement.

.

That's part of the problem here. He was so distant that even if you knew the signs it would be hard to identify him because it sounds like he wasn't involved in anyone else's life.

It doesn't sound like he was close to his own family.

There should have been some indication to them that something was wrong.

Last Edited by Xerxes on 07/22/2012 12:39 PM

perfect!

Yeah exactly.

Sure did, as was my point in the other thread if you remember.

I think if I remember right it had something to do with Illegaly taking residence in a public park without a permit or some crap like that.

Sanitation was a serious concern though.

As far as I am concerned the City/Cities were within their right to evict the occupyers from the parks.

It's still their right to protest though.

r u guys serious with this? This photo is clearly NOT Holmes, there is not even the slightest resemblence...

People, free your minds from the socioeconomic bullshit you are being fed from all corners of society, the path, the truth is always somewhere in the middle...

I'll repeat again...

A year ago, Anders Breivik shot 69 teenagers in a summer camp in Norway, and he was not an "Occupy black bloc", but a right-wing extremist, with purported ties to the English Defense League.

oh stop with debating the occupy crap already.

the point is, this guy way an activist. he wanted to make an impact, a name for himself. all he needed was to fall into the right handler's arms and be pointed in a direction, supplied with goods & COACHED.

somewhere that happened, just like the middle east guys get snatched up & play out their handler's fantasies of killing lots of people for some cause or "jihad" too.

young males male pretty good programmable killers it seems

no matter what country and nearly no matter what cause.

too bad this guy didn't get laid by a girl instead as a way to work out his frustrations. I am sure in some way his piss poor ability to deal in society made him happy to just kill innocent people instead.


.

So maybe making programs more accessible or targeted to loners? Maybe it's such a rare incident all we can do is grieve over them? I'd promote more concealed carry and self defense, an armed and protected society is a polite one but that's just one of my opinions.

But like I said dedicating multiple threads to trying to figure out if he was or wasn't part of a group that has no membership? Fucking waste of time and literally seeing how excited you are getting over the possibility, I find it sad. That THIS is actually meaningful to you. If it was Scientology or ANYTHING with an actual membership, not just extremely loose-knit group of people showing up talking to people and marching, I MIGHT consider what you have to say.

Proving that a small handful of ANY group are fucked up proves nothing to me other then how badly YOU want this to be what represents something because EVERY group has fucked up people in it.

I mean you could turn around and get all "OH LOOK ITS AN OCCUTARD LULZ" cause that's productive. Considering the gun grab bullshit and the second shooter and shit that don't make sense you could maybe spend some of your time on something that might matter rather then desperately trying to fuel the left vs right bullshit.

Redhead being part of the tea party makes a lot of sense.

Oh wait... perhaps with bold letters Borat's hawk eyes will now notice this:

A year ago, Anders Breivik shot 69 teenagers in a summer camp in Norway, and he was not an "Occupy black bloc", but a right-wing extremist, with purported ties to the English Defense League.

.

switchblade, those were public parks and they were involved in public meetings.

That's clearly protected by Sect. 2(c) of your Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms!

.

Or programs targeted to uninvolved parents demonstrating the importance of being involved and interested in their children's lives.

Of course, I guess his murders demonstrated that.

^^^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^^^

96% accuracy OP?? You're right!!!

...96% of the sheeple will believe it

Yes but as I said Sanitation was the concern, but 2c is regarding peaceful assembly, and yes it defied the charter. but the fact is fact. there was a lot of miss-justice going on regardless of the side. There were violent demonstrators mixing in with the peaceful, The camps reaked of shit Access to Sanitation is a right over here as well, by the point they got rid of our camps Occupy had degraded to the state that it was nothing more than a group of people shouting slogans from a park they were squatting.

It is important to note that I didn't say that the Charter says they were within their rights to evict the occupyers, I said "As far as I am concerned they were..."

This does not mean that I feel that their right weren't infringed slightly, I just feel it was time.

Are you not tired of the multinational bankers crapping on your front doorstep every day? Or the DHS and UN squatting on American territory?
This is relatively minor of what is to come. It might be 10 years, it might be 100, but someone is going to rise up and give these snakes their deserved justice, and I won't be saddened one bit.
I think your complacent and sycophant behavior is a sign of mental behavior. You're being raped on a daily basis but you've just forgotten how to care.

hey guys is the reason your keep debating the occupy crap on this thread is because if you started a "lets debate the occupy movement" thread no one would give a crap? yeah I THOUGHT SO

no one on this thread gives a crap about it either

AND you guys still debating curly vs. non-curly hair are stupid, too.

geez
intellectual level of this thread has reached -40 IQ points

Also as you are trying to break it out, 2c only applies to Federal parks, not Provincial or Municipal, on that level the province or the city is aloud to require permits for extended gatherings, and at that point it gets even more complicated.

The largest of the Canadian Occupy camps was in Toronto, Toronto is a Corporation not a city.

It acts entirely separately from a Federal or Provincial entity and as well acts against traditional municipal doctrine.

because it is a Corporation parks are not guaranteed public spaces.

On the Other side the Corporation of Windsor, allowed the Occupiers to remain as long as they wished, and advised them when it was necessary for them to move their tents due to Winterizing of sprinkler systems.

.


Both despicable, inhuman acts worthy of condemnation by everyone.


The only difference, fool, is that the Occupy movement really
approves of Holmes' terror act, because it strikes at the
Capitalists by scaring away consumer "sheep" that support
the Entertainment industry and other economic sectors.

When WB releases their low box office numbers following this
terrorism act, Black Bloc Occupiers will see the validity of the
revolutionary statement: "If you want to make an omelet, you
gotta break some eggs."

That's why the Occupy movement is now the enemy to all who
the movement sees as "sheep".



.