BLOOD TRACKS BACK INTO THE THEATER--- BOMBSHELL VIDEO

whoamygod. boom headshot. shin this here pit!

karma pin? anyone?

gonna be a while its hard to explain that ... Lolol

lol, what do you mean?

I like the description in the video:

Something went down after the gun fight outside the theater which suggests an individual went back into the theater. Please download, reupload, share, like. Bombshell evidence that there were multiple individuals involved.

The chief emphasized that there was only ONE shooter, and if they fucking back into this "suspecting another person" (because of the work we've done) after how much they stressed there was only one.... Then, fine, we've firmly established they don't know what the fuck they are doing and they need to provide details and atleast a mugshot! Hello?

Eye witness claiming someone let the man in:
[link to www.youtube.com]

Eye witness claiming "must have been two people involved": [link to www.youtube.com]

Eye witness corroborating that at least one tear gas can was not likely thrown by the perp:
[link to www.9news.com]

You people are stupid this is not going into the theater take it from the first large pool this is the heart pumping out the blood the dribbles are dripping off the clothing in between.

if you can't see that the blood is leading away from the door, you are a idiot. It is pretty obvious. It trails to the right, not left.....

trying to just make others believe bs by suggestion is an old trick for weak minds. grow a brain. think for yourself.

hahahaha. You idiot shill. What did he do? Clot up in a few seconds? Looks at the quantity of blood in near the door as opposed to the quantity of blood from, what I consider to be, the start.

Also, you just answered for my point of view saying that it:

"the first large pool this is the heart pumping out the blood the dribbles are dripping off the clothing in between"

Yeah, the "first large pool" is FIRST and it is away from the back door, and the "dribbles" are NEXT and it is heading towards the door.

lol, you have no clue what you are talking about. You think the blood dribbles in multiple directions and then converges to a plop?

BLOOD DRIPS. WHERE DO THE DRIBBLES HEAD?

Fucking bullshit... the blood spatters are LEAVING the theatre.. the fucking douche on the video has no fucking clue what he is talking about.

thats 3 so far

the blood is clearly moving away from the theatre

LOL LOOK AT THIS COMMENT AND REPLY:



if you cant tell that the blood is leading away from the door, you are an idiot. so sad in tragedies like this we get so many who talk out the side of their head about something they were not a part of. you need a hobby.
tearsoftechnology 17 minutes ago

Wow, 3 unrelated fallicious arguments: the emotional card, the institutional analysis card, and the has no fucking clue what he's talking about card. I would love to meet you in person sometime ;-D !!! You definitely don't have an agenda going on here, you child rape supporting shill. I like how your vic is dribbling blood from 2 diff spots and then plopping a big one before repeating that process. Oh, and I like how he was bleeding all over the place by the door, and clotted up like wolverine.
Thomas Brinkley in reply to tearsoftechnology 1 second ago

3? What do you mean? Shills?

Yeah Was just wondering who would post on the thread and in what manner ... I like your vid...

It also bothers me all the pics are in the daylight ... when the event happend at night

Ok, whoever made the video got this wrong I will explain. Victim leaves the theatre, once outside he stops to check his or her injuries (Blood Pool #1) Victim then begins walking toward the parking lot as you can see the blood pattern veers off for only a moment. After this for whatever reason the victim seems to change direction and in doing this retraces a few steps creating (blood Pool #2) also notice around blood pool 2 that because the victim retraced his or her steps the blood pattern does not match the rest of the blood splatter and seems to be in multiple direction and judging by how much blood there is the person may have once again stopped momentarily. At that point its a little trickier but it seems that the person continued away from the theatre, however they were moving at a slow pace because the blood trail gets a little thinner(if they were running there would be more blood as the heart would be pumping faster)Judging by the blood trail I would say this victim had a somewhat serious injury but more then likely is a survivor

Right, well you can see they have set up markers for the crime scene. I'm assuming they also have the door propped open. I doubt it was open or non-self shutting.

For this reason, I'm certain no one escaped out the back door because it would have not only required a vic to run towards the direction which is psychologically associated with danger, but also to a loud sounding heavy mechanical door which would have drawn attention. Witnesses claim they were trying to be as low and quiet as possible to avoid drawing attention.

you really have no clue what you are talking about. The vic would neither be walking away from the door nor having a low heart beat in that situation. Or even sticking around to check himself?!?!?!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ^^^^^^^^^^^

This sounds about right .... yes i was aware it was the crime scene photo of the next day ...

I agree it is unlikely a victim would run to where the shooter came in from ... one would not want to make a loud noise ..

right. It's more likely everyone was thinking "leave the way I came in" especially with the nearly unanimous understanding from eye-witnesses that the man may have had accomplices. They would have thought they were running out into a death squad.

1. the person clearly has a somewhat severe injury so yes the person is moving slowly
2. He would not have a LOW heartbeat thats not at all what I suggested, a person walking will have a lower heartrate then a person running and will be pumping out less blood
3. When things like this happen, time appears to come to a halt and people dont always think clearly. The victim would not have taken much time to check himself probably only seconds and the reason this would of been done at this point is because it was the first moment he was able to do this as the theatre would have been too dark and it was the first time the victim was away from the gunman
4. I have a background in this and you clearly show no ability to view the event from a victims point of view

It is you who is stupid.

Dripping off clothing, no it was a blood soaked foot probably due to large blown leg artery. and IT WAS going into the theater otherwise the trail end would have a larger pool where the victim stopped moving.

typically blood pools do not get bigger unless its a fatal injury

Reminds me of the columbine witness reports ... about the people in all black swat gear

if not treated would losing blood be fatal ?

yes if untreated a minor scratch can be fatal, had the victim of fell down at the end of the trail there would also be blood pooling

dude, your shit is so fucked up that I can't even be bothered to read what you are writing and hatching out of your ass.

im also not claiming to be dexter lol there is a number of other scenarios but you can tell enough from this blood pattern that the victim was clearly moving away from the theatre, also possible that the victim stopped outside the door to tie something like a shirt around the wound to apply pressure which would also explain the blood pattern getting smaller

2nd person to attack me yet i dont see you telling me why...so explain and lets have an intelligent conversation, something I never see on this site

also feel free to do your own fact checking, there is more then enough information on the internet that you can get a basic understanding of this stuff