| Users Online Now: 1,858 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 805,726 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,381,376 | Threads Today: 535 | Posts Today: 9,883 |
| 03:24 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,858 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 805,726 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,381,376 | Threads Today: 535 | Posts Today: 9,883 |
| 03:24 PM | ||
LIBTARD HYPOCRISY: Why didn'y you care about JOHN KERRY'S wealth when that DORK ran in 2004? | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21182240  United States08/03/2012 04:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's another difference between the two: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21181116 John Kerry volunteered for Vietnam and was a decorated hero who came to oppose US involvement in that civil war, while mitt was a typical chickenhawk repuke who sneered at anti-war demonstrators from his cocoon in prep school and dodged his opportunity to go fight the vietcong. John Kerry was an outspoken anti-war activist long before he volunteered. It's WHY he volunteered; he thought being a veteran who comes home and speaks out against the war was the key to his future political career. His scheme worked. Keep in mind, he consistently LIED about his service in Vietnam...going so far as to injure himself to get a Purple Heart. He never saw action; he did no fighting. None. Ever. But he made up a lot of stories about it. Also, he was DISHONORABLY DISCHARGED. His status remained that way until he successfully petitioned Jimmy Carter to get that changed, thus enabling him to enter politics on the national level. In short, he entered the military with the goal of helping to undermine it. That is called treason, and he should have been awarded the Lead Insert Medal via firing squad. Yet you called him a hero. You are a lying piece of shit. On February 16, 1978, Kerry received an "Honorable Discharge from the U.S. Naval Reserve," pursuant to former Section 1162 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code [17] and "in accordance with the approved recommendations of a board of officers convened under the authority of [former] Section 1163 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code [18] to examine the official records of officers of the Naval Reserve on inactive dutyand determine whether they should be retained on the rolls of the Reserve Component or separated from the naval service pursuant to the Secretarial instructions [link to en.m.wikipedia.org] Yes, he was skeptical of Vietnam and still volunteered. You wouldn't understand that so you spin fantasies about treason in your filthy mind. Lying rats like you disgust me. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21182240 United States08/03/2012 05:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | With respect to Kerry's discharge from the Naval Reserve, Rowan Scarborough of the Washington Times wrote: "A second charge is that Mr. Kerry did not successfully fulfill his time in the Reserves, so a special board had to be convened to determine what type of discharge he should receive. Navy documents show that in 1978, he received an "honorable discharge certificate" after a board of officers convened and reviewed his record. Navy officials say today that the board was standard operating procedure at that time for all reservists and does not indicate Mr. Kerry did anything wrong. After service just short of four years on active duty, Mr. Kerry transferred to the Ready Reserve and then in 1972 to the standby Reserve. He was not required to attend drills under those two designations, says a Navy official who asked not to be named." [link to en.m.wikipedia.org] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21182240 United States08/03/2012 05:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | On the subject of military service, where was this chickenhawk? FIVE DEFERMENTS DICK  Where was this chickenhawk?  Going AWOL from the Champagne Division of the Texas Air National Guard. (Isn't going AWOL during wartime a death penalty kind of thing?) |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21183314 United States08/03/2012 06:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | MIT'S MILLIONS COMES FROM BEING 'GORDON GEKKO'. (OR DANNY DEVITO IN 'OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY') KING OF THE LEVERAGED BUY OUT, THE HOSTILE TAKE OVER. (which was ILLEGAL UNTILL REAGAN LEGALIZED IT) P.S. if corp's are people; HOSTILE TAKE OVERs are murder !! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21166367 United States08/03/2012 01:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You are a lying piece of shit. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21182220 On February 16, 1978, Kerry received an "Honorable Discharge from the U.S. Naval Reserve," pursuant to former Section 1162 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code [17] and "in accordance with the approved recommendations of a board of officers convened under the authority of [former] Section 1163 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code [18] to examine the official records of officers of the Naval Reserve on inactive dutyand determine whether they should be retained on the rolls of the Reserve Component or separated from the naval service pursuant to the Secretarial instructions [link to en.m.wikipedia.org] Yes, he was skeptical of Vietnam and still volunteered. You wouldn't understand that so you spin fantasies about treason in your filthy mind. Lying rats like you disgust me. I'm not lying, and the fact that you're using Wikipedia as a 'source' should make it quite obvious that you don't know what you're talking about. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21166367 United States08/03/2012 01:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | John Kerry's wife married into the ketchup business. She has a senator fetish...and keep in mind she's not an American. Her first senator husband was killed in a plane crash over 20 years ago. I'm sure it was just as 'accident'. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 2377729  Canada08/03/2012 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21195063 United States08/03/2012 01:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Because, as a democrat, he is a rich guy that does not mind wealth redistribution. But with Mitt, you can feel that his wealth really screwed him up a bit about social knowledge and responsibility. And even if he did have some social responsibility, the Tea Party and GOP would remind him that he is a republican who needs to act for the interest of the very rich. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1068718 And I think people did make jokes about the wealth of Kerry at the time. well, not even voting this election because the candidates suck that bad but kerry is/was just as bad as romney and he, like romney, was in it to lose it kerry ran on ending war in iraq while his stock portfolio went up because of his investments in the military industrial complex there truly is no difference wealthy families who want to rule in american politics are in it for ego and power and furthering agendas they are not and have never been "of the people" once they enter the elite circles they become one of them otherwise they do not remain in those circles and they certainly don't get to be a top candidate on either ticket |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 18967044  France08/03/2012 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Terrebonne  User ID: 21197509 United States08/03/2012 03:00 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BECAUSE KERRY PAID TAXES ON HIS MONEY, AND ROMNEY HASN'T PAID TAXES IN 10 YEARS Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8240773 Romney: Reid's claim about unpaid taxes 'untrue' Romney has released his 2010 federal tax return and a summary of his 2011 return. In 2010, he paid 13.9 percent tax on income of $21.6 million. Most of Romney's income came from investment gains, which are taxed at a lower rate than earned income. [link to www.knoxnews.com] INFJ; We are the protectors. |
