What does the symbol of the Templar cross overlayed with a skull and crossbones mean ? | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 19045680 United States 08/01/2012 06:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 19045680 United States 08/01/2012 07:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MAGDALENE User ID: 12339037 United States 08/01/2012 07:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.knightstemplar-uk.co.uk] MAGDALENE |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 19045680 United States 08/01/2012 07:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I AM A MEMBER OF THE KNIGHTS OF TEMPLAR AND THE SYMBOL OF THE SKULL AND CROSS BONES ORIGINATED FROM KNIGHTS HAVING THEIR LEGS CUT OFF AND CROSSED LIKE AN X OVER THEIR CHEST AT BURIAL. THIS WAS SO NO SPIRIT COULD INHABIT THEIR HUMAN FLESH AND BECAME A SYMBOL OF HUMAN. NOT EVERYBODY IS. Quoting: MAGDALENE [link to www.knightstemplar-uk.co.uk] I see. Thanks |
Klink User ID: 8722925 United States 08/01/2012 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I AM A MEMBER OF THE KNIGHTS OF TEMPLAR AND THE SYMBOL OF THE SKULL AND CROSS BONES ORIGINATED FROM KNIGHTS HAVING THEIR LEGS CUT OFF AND CROSSED LIKE AN X OVER THEIR CHEST AT BURIAL. THIS WAS SO NO SPIRIT COULD INHABIT THEIR HUMAN FLESH AND BECAME A SYMBOL OF HUMAN. NOT EVERYBODY IS. Quoting: MAGDALENE [link to www.knightstemplar-uk.co.uk] Noooo, the skull n bones also found in the RC and seen in many Jesuit paintings is from the victims. They like to put their victims bones on display. Most often it stands for the death of the Protestants. The Jesuit holds the skull of the Protestant in his hands. The churches are filled with bones from the dead who were conquered by Rome's henchmen, including the Templars. |
shenandoah User ID: 2636202 United States 08/01/2012 08:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Templars and Jesuits were really just converso/crypto jewish people, mostly. All the conversions from Judaism to Catholicism (during the Inquisitions), with crypto jewish people eventually entering the clergy and taking on important ecclesiastical positions, eventually altered the whole original character of the Roman Catholic church. Yet the original character of the Church wasn't that great to begin with, because they insisted on merging Church and State (like the Pagans always had done). That is counter to Jesus' teachings ("render unto Caesar" etc.). The ~earliest pious Christians were like the Essenes: they didn't involve themselves in politics, nor did they attempt to rule the world. One of the worst Grand Inquisitors, Tomas de Torquemada, was from a Jewish family which had converted. Many people believe Ignatius de Loyola's family was also Jewish; and his immediate successor most certainly was so. No one knows whether Loyala received Catholic Last Rites at his death, because the only witness to his death was a Jew. Hernando de Sota, one of Spain's most bloodthirsty and ruthless Catholic Conquistadors, was also from a Jewish family. Many people believe that some of the Catholic Popes were/are also Jewish. According to the "History of Freemasonry" (written by bona fide Freemasons), the Knights Templar were the same Secret Society which later became the Masons. Many Masons made their fortunes building Catholic cathedrals throughout Europe during the Middle Ages. They claim to have been descended from some of the builders of the Egyptian pyramids; and that Egypt was where they learned their Occult practices. However, although it began in Egypt, they continuously picked up variations on the Occult and Alchemy from every culture to which they ever came into contact: Persia, Babylon, India, Scandinavia, Germany... Like a conglomerate of beliefs, all centered around magic and sorcery. All mostly based in Paganism and/or Luciferianism. Always very secretive and exclusive (at the top), yet harboring ambitions for world dominance. Thus their attempts to merge ~all the major, popular religions into one World Church, by blurring or minimizing the differences between them, and by choosing certain key tenets which might link all of them together. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 19045680 United States 08/01/2012 08:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Templars and Jesuits are like two bad street gangs, only much wealthier (from all the loot they stole). They're really the same bunch of hoodlums, only in different forms. The Vatican had issues with both of them at times, because Rome doesn't like any competition for power. As long as they were obedient to the Pope, they stayed out of trouble; but they often intimidated the Popes, too. Quoting: shenandoah 2636202 The Templars and Jesuits were really just converso/crypto jewish people, mostly. All the conversions from Judaism to Catholicism (during the Inquisitions), with crypto jewish people eventually entering the clergy and taking on important ecclesiastical positions, eventually altered the whole original character of the Roman Catholic church. Yet the original character of the Church wasn't that great to begin with, because they insisted on merging Church and State (like the Pagans always had done). That is counter to Jesus' teachings ("render unto Caesar" etc.). The ~earliest pious Christians were like the Essenes: they didn't involve themselves in politics, nor did they attempt to rule the world. One of the worst Grand Inquisitors, Tomas de Torquemada, was from a Jewish family which had converted. Many people believe Ignatius de Loyola's family was also Jewish; and his immediate successor most certainly was so. No one knows whether Loyala received Catholic Last Rites at his death, because the only witness to his death was a Jew. Hernando de Sota, one of Spain's most bloodthirsty and ruthless Catholic Conquistadors, was also from a Jewish family. Many people believe that some of the Catholic Popes were/are also Jewish. According to the "History of Freemasonry" (written by bona fide Freemasons), the Knights Templar were the same Secret Society which later became the Masons. Many Masons made their fortunes building Catholic cathedrals throughout Europe during the Middle Ages. They claim to have been descended from some of the builders of the Egyptian pyramids; and that Egypt was where they learned their Occult practices. However, although it began in Egypt, they continuously picked up variations on the Occult and Alchemy from every culture to which they ever came into contact: Persia, Babylon, India, Scandinavia, Germany... Like a conglomerate of beliefs, all centered around magic and sorcery. All mostly based in Paganism and/or Luciferianism. Always very secretive and exclusive (at the top), yet harboring ambitions for world dominance. Thus their attempts to merge ~all the major, popular religions into one World Church, by blurring or minimizing the differences between them, and by choosing certain key tenets which might link all of them together. Very interesting ! Thanks for taking the time to type that up ! Yes, it seems that a unified religion of sorts might be an interesting thing. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21082358 Australia 08/01/2012 08:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |