afrocentrist claim the original vikings were black, self hating white liberals lap it all up

You find it. You're the one who needs "evidence" before you can believe a thing.

Whats is interesting is looking at different Indians in America. They have had it much worse than Blacks and much more recently.


The story of the Americas is largely untold and includes a chapter where the "Indians" did the oppressing of their darker skinned "enemy ancestors".

Nsibidi

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

tks

Sounds concocted to me.

The people who settled in the Niger Valley were autochthonous Europeans.

traditionally said to have come from the Uguakima, Ebe or Uyanga tribes of the Igbo people


Igbo people

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Pottery dated at around 4500 BCE showing similarities with later Igbo work was found at Nsukka

the ancestors of the Igbo people and most of their neighbors were the proto-Kwa group, which came from the African Great Lakes and Mountains of the Moon of East and Central Africa, before settling at the old Sahara grasslands.[39] The desertification of the Sahara forced some of the Kwa people to migrate farther south to the north of the Niger Benue confluence, where they developed the Nok culture

The story of the Americas is largely untold and includes a chapter where the "Indians" did the oppressing of their darker skinned "enemy ancestors".


the chapter's called " You snooze, you lose!" sorry we were
"civilized" like the white folk we were trying to intergrate with. in the 80's the cherokees actually threw out the blacks that were trying to claim benefits from the tribe. the cherokees are also the MOST SUCESSFUL of ALL the tribes left in america. we have no "white guilt". fuck blacks. we owe them nothing. they owe us for protecting them.
they do not belong in the tribe. whites would benefit from
this point of view. embrace your whiteness,but do no harm.

the chapter's called " You snooze, you lose!" sorry we were
"civilized" like the white folk we were trying to intergrate with. in the 80's the cherokees actually threw out the blacks that were trying to claim benefits from the tribe. the cherokees are also the MOST SUCESSFUL of ALL the tribes left in america. we have no "white guilt". fuck blacks. we owe them nothing. they owe us for protecting them.
they do not belong in the tribe. whites would benefit from
this point of view. embrace your whiteness,but do no harm.


The majority of the 'indians' allowed to live were those who bowed to the master. The rest were exterminated. You don't even know what a 'tribe' is.

And modern America is filled with Mutants



Or is it really?

It's not can't understand it's just not true

Tribal people live places now just like they did then, in SA, Africa, the Islands... Many places

1:They have worms

2: They have a life expectancy of 30

3: Often they are as children subjected to really f'd up shit in the name of their tribal culture, bizarre rituals of manhood that scar them for life

4:Often they starve they are at the whim of the earth, and no the Earth doesn't make decisions any more than the fictional god.

5: when we make a mistake and suffer like Fukishima, in 40 years I might get cancer, they wont live the first 40 years I have already lived in the first place, for lack of a Dentist or whatever your going to get a flippin Brain infection and go rabid in the jungle

6: wiping your ass with leaves while being eaten by malaria ridden misquotes vs toilet paper = Living in Harmony with Nature

The majority of the 'indians' allowed to live were those who bowed to the master. The rest were exterminated. You don't even know what a 'tribe' is.


dude what century are you in? indians had black slaves.
they did from the very begining. we did not "bow to the master". thats why YA'LL needed africans dummy. lots of "indians " got "away" my friend. thats how i'm here.
i belong to the 'bad injuns'. but i dont hate white people.
unlike the blacks, that cant seem to get over the whole
'slavery 'thing. they should be happy they are here and not
in ethiopia starving,naked,and covered in flies.
i am grateful for my city, for my country. i am a productive member of society, but in the 1800's had the same background as a black in america. my grandma picked cotton in the south WITH THE BLACKS. nobody won the lottery in my family, we are doing ok, nobodys on welfare, some are actually rich. now how come the blacks cant do the same?

dude what century are you in? indians had black slaves.
they did from the very begining. we did not "bow to the master". thats why YA'LL needed africans dummy. lots of "indians " got "away" my friend. thats how i'm here.
i belong to the 'bad injuns'. but i dont hate white people.
unlike the blacks, that cant seem to get over the whole
'slavery 'thing. they should be happy they are here and not
in ethiopia starving,naked,and covered in flies.
i am grateful for my city, for my country. i am a productive member of society, but in the 1800's had the same background as a black in america. my grandma picked cotton in the south WITH THE BLACKS. nobody won the lottery in my family, we are doing ok, nobodys on welfare, some are actually rich. now how come the blacks cant do the same?


Back to work slave. Whitey loves you.

lmao this thread is hilarious, even Muhammed Ali said.....
"thank God for the white man cause we would still be living in huts in Africa"

You haven't done enough research. Find out how the monks describe them and why Romans described these blond and red-haired warriors as keltoi. The word Beserk comes from these crazy, fighting men and their fierce demeanor.

He wasn't. He would look more like the presant day Arabs.

United Kingdom!(1340872) WHAT A WASTE OF SPACE!








The Celts (pronounced Kelts) were originally a group of people that stretched from the British Isles right accross Europe to Galatia (a Roman province in Anatolia, modern day Turkey). The Celtic tribes were called Galli by the Romans and Galatai or Keltoi by the Greeks--both terms meaning barbarian--and it is from the greek Keltoi that 'Celt' is derived.

Diodorus (a Greek Historian) wrote about the Celts:
"Their aspect is terrifying...They are very tall in stature, with ripling muscles under clear white skin. Their hair is blond, but not naturally so: they bleach it, to this day, artificially, washing it in lime and combing it back from their foreheaads. They look like wood-demons, their hair thick and shaggy like a horse's mane. Some of them are cleanshaven, but others--especially those of high rank--shave their cheeks but leave a moustache that covers the whole mouth and, when they eat and drink, acts like a sieve, trapping particles of food...The way they dress is astonishing: they wear brightly coloured and embroidered shirts, with trousers called bracae and cloaks fastened at the shoulder with a brooch, heavy in winter, light in summer. These cloaks are striped or chequered in design, with the seperate checks close together and in various colours.

[The Celts] wear bronze helmets with figures picked out on them, even horns, which made them look even taller than they already are...while others cover themselves with breast-armour made out of chains. But most content themselves with the weapons nature gave them: they go naked into battle...Weird, discordant horns were sounded, [they shouted in chorus with their] deep and harsh voices, they beat their swords rythmically against their shields."

The Celts dealt Rome, still in it's infancy, it's most humiliating defeat ever. A group of Celts had defeated the Etruscans (south of the River Po) and took their land. The Romans sent three envoys to study the conflict. It was (according to Livy's 'The Early History of Rome') a civilized communication:
"[The Celts told the Roman envoys that] this was indeed the first time they had heard of them, but they assumed the Romans must be a courageous people because it was to them that the [Etruscans] had turned to in their hour of need. And since the Romans had tried to help with an embassy and not with arms, they themselves would not reject the offer of peace, provided the [Etruscans] ceded part of their seperfluous agricultural land; that was what they, the Celts, wanted.... If it were not given, they would launch an attack before the Romans' eyes, so that the Romans could report back how superior the Gauls were in battle to all others....The Romans then asked whether it was right to demand land from its owners on pain of war, indeed what were the Celts going in Etruria in the first place? The latter defiantly retorted that their right lay in their arms: To the brave belong all things."

Unfortunately, the Romans broke the good faith and aided the Etruscans. The Celts sent an envoy to Rome demanding that all members of the Fabian family, to which the three original envoys belonged, be handed over--quite in line with Roman protocol of the time. The Fabian family was powerful, and so the Roman senate were in a pickle, so they passed the request over to the 'Popular Assembly'. The assembly granted the family consular powers (the highest that could be granted), rather than hand them over. This was a mortal insult to the Celts, who gathered a great host and marched south to Rome. They cleaved a path through the countryside, vanquishing several battalions of Roman soldiers on the way, to lay siege to Rome itself. The siege lasted seven months, until negotiations were instigated. The Celts demanded one thousand pounds of gold in order that they lift their siege. As the gold was being weighed, the Romans claimed that the Celts were using rigged weights. Insulted, the leader of the Celts, Brennus, threw his sword into the balance and said: "vae victis" ("Woe to the defeated").

Trivia: Saint Patrick, the patron saint of Ireland, and the man who brought Christianity of Ireland, was from Wales.


The Culture Of IrelandDiscoverIreland.com
Discover The Culture Of The Irish Go Where Ireland Takes You!

Southwest Official Sitewww.southwest.com
Fly Free Faster With Southwest. Enroll Now & Get 250 Bonus Points!

Face to Face MomentsHistory.com
Find Out About The Events That Changed The World at HISTORY™.

I have a question. If black people are SOOOOOO great and have done so much good stuff, why are the only civilized parts of Africa either white or Arab people?

I am so sick and fucking tired of black people trying to claim shit they didn't do....

I normally don't get into this, but you're are wrong dude. On a lot of levels. Genes don't lie, Celts are from the Russian steppes.

Dark hair, brown eyes, and olive skin could get you the designation of black in ancient and Medieval times

Next we will hear is that Neanders were black.We know it for sure. BTW, Everyone outside of Africa has some of them in their genes.

Oh and wise guy give me the story on red hair

Not to sound racist or demeaning but if you look at things from an historical perspective without the white there is no black history to be looked at all. This is to say without the institutions and great universities in Europe which in term produced the great men who went out and explored Africa and expenditures to its most wild and chaotic areas there is no black history. So as dependent as you blacks want to make the white man think he is on you this is not the truth and history testifies to this fact and validates this claim. Yes I do believe the white man has maybe messed up history or given it a distorted perspective but simply because the white man lived in a structured and ordered society allowed him to even garner the possibility to become a well educated individual. In Africa this was not even possibility and because of the low levels of education the African tribal system tends to lack the ability to rationally discourse not to mention act in a way that is morally binding. This is why the African tribal system sold their own people into slavery because they had no regard for the life of even their own. So if you want to talk about the white man being a force of destruction you might want to think twice before you say this because at the same time without the white man there is no construction. All the things that have allowed a few exceptional black men to become well educated has everything to do with the white men. It would not be necessary to look upon white men in the same way you truthfully are this is just pushing the blame to a sphere of people that don't deserve it. But since ignorance is feigned knowledge in African culture and since this will always be the case I should never expect you to see white people as they truly are.

and caucasian King Tut

Silly blackies ! :african:

Fine, get the fuck out of africa then and let us whites have it, you blacks can have europe, where theres not a single trace of you bullshitters, but its fine with me ... I'd trade norwegian winter for beaches and coconuts in congo any day and we'd make your african hellhole better than anything we've ever had in europe with all the gold, diamonds, oil etc you have down there but need the chinese to get anything done with.

Bump for my Viking brothas!

you guys are unintelligent to know the truth. you are disgusting human beings, stop seeing in color, your the problem not people of African descent. Stop being so insecure of yourselves and acknowledge the evidence that is before you.

Thanks for the laugh. History revisionist.

Thanks for the laugh

A least Jesus wasnt a white trash honkey.

even Hitler was a black jew