DaVinci painting found depicting Mary Magdalene with Child

Amazing story. Very strange that this picture is REVEALED at this time.

What I find fascinating are the divine bloodline secrets hinted within the picture. You have the cain/able, jesus/john, horus/set... like brothers, a feature seen in other of DaVinci's paintings.

But the most startling thing is the child, NOT being held by Mary... clearly pointing at the LAMB OF GOD. This is a veiled reference to the book of Revelations in the Bible, where it is the Lamb who is the only one "worthy" to open the seven seals and unleash the wrath of God and bring about the end of the world.

Very cool, symbolic painting. Clearly... more than meets the eye, as with all of Davinci's works.

A little nifty research into the surname Mclaren reveals:

" Recorded as MacLaren, McLaren and the patronymic McLarens, this is a famous Scottish surname. It originates from the pre 10th century "Mac Labhruinn" translating a the son of Labhrunn, the latter being a Gaelic form of the ancient Roman baptismal name Lawrence. This was a name associated with biblical times, and hence one which was brought back to Europe by returning Crusader knights of the 12th century, fresh from their many and varied attempts to seize the Holy Land and Jersusalem from the grip of the Muslim. The derivation is from the Latin word "Laurentius", meaning the city of laurels, and which for various reasons has over the many centuries been associated both with peace and victory. The forename is first recorded as Laurentius in the Pipe Rolls of the county of Norfolk, England in 1141, whilst Lorin Mac Gilserf is the first recorded Scottish namebearer in 1258. "

Read more: [link to www.surnamedb.com]

coincidental, I'm sure

There are people that still believe that? What is the problem with him being sexually active? Seriously.

painting seems to be more of Elizabeth, mother of John the Baptist, than Magdelene.

Clearly the clothed child is John the Baptist, pointing to the lamb. John has a halo,the other child does not. but, there is this curious thing behind his head. wonder what that is.

Woman also has a halo.

You are a dumbass modern who has rejected history for the sake of your own sin. Fuck off. Oh wait, you do.

" The surname first appears in the latter half of the 13th Century, (see below) and in modern spellings has at least seven variations including MacLauren, MacLaran, MacLaurin, MacLawrin and MacClaren, as well as the short forms commencing "Mc" and various spellings without the Gaelic prefix at all. The first recorded spelling of the family name is shown to be that of Johannes M'Lern. This was dated 1466, in the Register of the Great Seal of Scotland, during the reign of King James III of Scotland, 1460 - 1488 "

Read more: [link to www.surnamedb.com]

Which is interesting because of the connections between King James II and King James III and the Templar Knights

[link to www.masonicnetwork.org]

I dumbass modern, lol. Yeah, okay. Maybe you need to actually look at history. You sound soooooooooo Christ-like with your "fuck off". What's wrong? You DON'T have sex? LOL, please.

I dumbass modern, lol. Yeah, okay. Maybe you need to actually look at history. You sound soooooooooo Christ-like with your "fuck off". What's wrong? You DON'T have sex? LOL, please.

I've not had sex, right, and I don't look to justify my sin.

painting seems to be more of Elizabeth, mother of John the Baptist, than Magdelene.

Clearly the clothed child is John the Baptist, pointing to the lamb. John has a halo,the other child does not. but, there is this curious thing behind his head. wonder what that is.

Woman also has a halo.

Jesus was a VIRGIN, this is why he is called the LAMB OF GOD!!!


STUPID PEOPLE!!!!

I dumbass modern, lol. Yeah, okay. Maybe you need to actually look at history. You sound soooooooooo Christ-like with your "fuck off". What's wrong? You DON'T have sex? LOL, please.

there are very specific reasons why Jesus did not engage in sexual activity. it is complicated and detailed with many layers to the reasons. a person who has not studied theology will not understand the implications of a sexually active Messiah. Jesus did not marry, either.

Sorry to tell you this, but sex is a necessity to keep the human race going.

You are full of crock...
You really think Jesus wasnt married ... o.O

there are very specific reasons why Jesus did not engage in sexual activity. it is complicated and detailed with many layers to the reasons. a person who has not studied theology will not understand the implications of a sexually active Messiah. Jesus did not marry, either.

Looking closely at the un-haloed child, the strange thing behind his head appears also on the top and the left side as well.....looks like it could be a sort of crown

Not everyone has sex. Jesus didn't.

And of those who have sex, only within proper marriage can it be justified. Sex out of marriage is sinful, fucktard.

Not everyone has sex. Jesus didn't.

And of those who have sex, only within proper marriage can it be justified. Sex out of marriage is sinful, fucktard.

Hey Indigo! Miss ya honey....see your getting into with the bible people...don't waste your time honey lol

I have studied. I was raised Catholic, grew up in Catholic school. I have also studied various forms of Christianity. It my studying that has led me to my current belief system. Everyone has a belief system that resonates with them. It is my current belief that Jesus was sexually active. As far as being married to Mary Magdalene, I don't think that he was, although I do think they had a very close relationship. If I look at my belief system, there are specific reasons why Jesus would have engaged in sexual activity...and the reasons aren't for simple animalistic pleasures.

there are very specific reasons why Jesus did not engage in sexual activity. it is complicated and detailed with many layers to the reasons. a person who has not studied theology will not understand the implications of a sexually active Messiah. Jesus did not marry, either.

I have studied. I was raised Catholic, grew up in Catholic school. I have also studied various forms of Christianity. It my studying that has led me to my current belief system. Everyone has a belief system that resonates with them. It is my current belief that Jesus was sexually active. As far as being married to Mary Magdalene, I don't think that he was, although I do think they had a very close relationship. If I look at my belief system, there are specific reasons why Jesus would have engaged in sexual activity...and the reasons aren't for simple animalistic pleasures.

Yes you are right. Theologists need to make history reflect their theory, because of the complex logical implications, if things are not as they say. So they will claim and desperately hand on to a suggestion that things were one way,not another, because if they were to admit the possibility, then their whole theory comes crashing down like a house of cards. The requirement to believe that Jesus was an unmarried virgin, is primary to the religious theories of the Roman Cult, as well as many of the more modern North American "Evangelical" cults.

One has to wonder.....

Davinci ~ April 15, 1452 – May 2, 1519
King James III ~ 10 July 1451 – 11 June 1488