Effects of emasculation

You want to know what my dad's mother did to him?

She got pregnant with him at 14 and she was forced to marry the alcoholic that impregnated her. She either already was seriously emotionally disturbed or she became worse under the abuse of the alcoholic.

But, she mentally tortured my dad for being a boy and having a penis.

He never was right all the years I knew him. How could a woman do this to her own son. In her later years, she made very intense demands on him to take care of her and her house as a woman would her husband. She never laid off of him cause she had to be in control. See her insanity combined with his dads alcoholism and abusive rages conspired to make my dad one mean son of a bitch. He could turn that mean on anyone, but mostly his wife and daughters caught it cause it was so easy to let it loose on us and then he had a brief period of time of relief from it before it built up again and had to be released.

In the end, there has been so much pain and so much suffering. Death.

LOL.

I'm sorry if you're misunderstanding me but I'm posting QUOTES FROM THE BOOK Advertised in the video! These are not my own thoughts!


I'm going to edit all the posts to say that now to avoid confusion.

Last Edited by bannedfornoreason on 08/07/2012 04:23 PM

Yes, I read it but I took it to mean that you think "punishment" should be meeted out to a partner displaying "disfunctional behaviors", but who is to decide what is disfunctional and what is not? This could go so many ways wrong.

All there is is sexually frustrated people, no one is really ruling anyone, not women over men or men over women, there's no such thing in this universe.

Exactly!

This is what I'm addressing in my posts. I'm asking other GLPers if they think it's right to inflict pain on women who t hey think are behaving dysfunctional You seemed to misunderstand me thinking I support this behavior.

Right, you see, this is an effect of inflicting pain (ie torturing) women into submission. This is what the video and the book advertised seems to support.

I may be wrong though.. I'm coming upon a section that says inflicting pain may not be the same as torture. I just don't know.. we've been taught all our lives that it's wrong to try and control things.

The way I see it is that human's natural ways of controlling dysfunctional behavior is to inflict pain in some way, however subtle it may be. It may not even seem like one is inflicting pain yet still it is in a more subtle way.

Ie like "inflicting painful emotions": "how would YOU feel".

Is this REALLY inflicting painful emotions or is this really more causing a person to analyze oneself? That's not inflicting pain, if the person feels bad about what he/she has done he/she is inflicting pain on oneself because he/she feels bad.

Last Edited by bannedfornoreason on 08/07/2012 04:32 PM

No one cares because both men and women believe that violence can stop violence.

Did you miss my post or is there another reason you're not addressing it?

You motherfuckers read the book first before you make baseless claims.

bannedfornoreason:

The book clearly distinguishes between applying pain and torture. Nobody is advocating torture. The purpose of pain to discourage dysfunctional behaviour. Look into operant conditioning.

FierySky:

What causes disorder is dysfunctional, what causes order is functional. It's not some subjective crap.

All angry women in this thread:

I would like to give all of you a slap in the face.

And people everywhere agree with this.

Geez, it must be just part of the human condition.

This is probably why monks choose not to live in human society. Because humanity requires violence to stop violence.

I know there's a difference between inflicting pain, and torture.. but it's still inflicting pain. When do you know when to stop? Torture is "too much" of the inflicting pain. Again how do you know when to stop? How do you know when SHE has had enough? And what exactly is defined as "dysfunctional, requiring inflicting pain"?


Somewhere deep in the subconscious mind of humans, there is a belief that pain is required to stop "dysfunctional" behavior.

Last Edited by bannedfornoreason on 08/07/2012 05:06 PM

No I didn't miss it. Just did not think there was a need to address it.


Well actually, first of all I don't even know what to say to that.. What were you expecting?

Last Edited by bannedfornoreason on 08/07/2012 05:09 PM

You stop when the dysfunctional behaviour has stopped.

Unless your woman is tied up on your bed naked and you have a riding crop in your hand. In this case you can take your time.

OK. Thanks. Since all the others were acknowledged, it made me wonder why mine wasn't. No problem.

Yea see.. I dont know.

I guess I should read the rest of the book.

The image I get about all this is that women have been severely disabled due to the fact that women were always seen and made to be inferior to men throughout history. Women seem to have no ability to think or make any wise decisions according to the writers of history.
And you see this in the movies, and in all media that is about the patriarchal society we lived in.

This book still only wants patriarchy I guess.

Last Edited by bannedfornoreason on 08/07/2012 05:12 PM

Women are indeed intellectually and physically inferior to men. This is why those Im-a-strong-independent-woman-who-dont-need-no-man types are delusional fools. They are likely to develop mental problems. This is why there are so many more women with mental problems than men.

Conversely, men also need women for female companionship, sex, and offsprings.

Wow see.. this is hard to accept. Do you blame me? Becuase I want to see women as not inferior to me and I don't believe the society needs to be patriarchal to have order?

Alright the book does address some things about patriarchy.. I still don't think I need to believe that women are intellectually/physically inferior to men.

Do you mean that in general she is worse than men, or just that it is "her place" being that she is more emotional/spiritual and less intellectual/physical.


I'm also not asking to be ridiculed and called "unmanly/beta" etc.

If these things are to be considered one needs to understand where men like me, as well as other men who have come from this society have been lead to believe. Ie, that women are "equal" in a sense that at the very least, men are not "superior" than women while women are inferior in the sense that she just simply stupid compared to men.

Last Edited by bannedfornoreason on 08/07/2012 05:26 PM

Am I wrong for questioning things? Am I weak and emasculate? Or rather, misinformed?

lol this video is great.

No I don't blame you. You have been conditioned by the feminist society since the day you were born. It's tough to be rid of something so deeply engrained. I was lucky enough to have not grown up with feminist parents but I lived in a feminist country since primary school so I'm still working to get rid of my conditioning.

The intellectual and physical inferiority of women is a fact. They are more suitable for other roles. But they are of equal importance to the society.

What we have now is not a "patriarchy". We have men and women both vying for power. We have unfulfilling relationships. We have sky high divorce rates. We have lost our civil rights because women can vote for idiot presidents who appeal to emotion and not reason. We have turmoil.

lol.

This is a common misconception: women are not more spiritual. Mainstream folks do not understand spirituality. They think doing yoga at the gym and looking at their horoscope somehow makes them spiritual.

You are definitely unmanly right now. It is better to accept you condition so you can begin reversing it. It is not an insult. It is simply pointing out your condition.

marked for later

Sounds right... I'm sure women will disagree. I for one somewhat agree and disagree.

I know that women are more emotional, or rather that is the Conditioned state of feminine roles, and that they are more "intuitive"/"spiritual" which is also a conditioned state of feminine cultural roles. That has probably become psychosomatic such that now it's physically engrained into our genetics.

WE are of equal importance, just because women are said to be more of the caretaker, emotional, intuitive/spiritual, doesn't make them any less physically manifested, or less important.

But you know that unmanliness is only a culturally conditioned role. I'm still a male human being.

Yes you are biologically male but they behaviour that you exhibit is unmanly.

The emotional inclination of women is by nature, not nurture, i.e., it is not a conditioned behaviour. If women are not emotional but rational feminism wouldn't have had devastating effects.

Don't you think calling another man unmanly is emasculating?

I'm sure, we have done that for thousands of years, warring over each other because one man calls another less manly. and for what, to attract the opposite sex? I'm sure women get off men calling each other less manly. Or rather, I'm sure.. women who are not WISE enough will automatically (without thinking or rationalizing) choose the man who calls the other man "unmanly".

Last Edited by bannedfornoreason on 08/07/2012 05:53 PM

/facepalm

Emasculating for who? You or me?

Either way:



As for you second paragraph, you will attract women by acting like a man, not by belittling others.

The elite, the mason's, the bankers, who ever it is behind the scenes are trying to create balance.

Draw a giant cross on a piece of paper.
the on each side write:
credit Debit
good evil
male female
old young


etc, etc.

The east is a patriarchy so they forced the west to balance it with a matriarchy, and yes the women in the west get all the rights, benefits, children, house, car, the man gets the debt and servitude. In the west a woman commits adultry she gets everything, in the east the woman gets death and the man gets everything.

The bigger picture because of this freemasonry, kabbala bullshit.

I grew up with a single mom most of my life. Mom left my dad for his "drug habit" when I was 2. I moved in with my father at 15 and have never been able to leave yet at 26 yrs old. His drug habit got me into it, he's an alcoholic. He also grew up without a mother or father, he grew up with a single grandmother. And he was abused when he was young because of it. Myself.. I've never had a female ever even wanting to be a friend.

So yea, I do feel a bit "unmanly" but.. I still think calling person a wimp or less manly is not really empowering nor helpful. My single dad drug user has been calling me a wimp all my life. In fact, everyone has. Has it "helped" me? Not really. Sure I'm looking to change things but has it made me any "less manly" when I still have had social anxiety, and agoraphobia my whole life.

Maybe things will change when I find that new job.. but frankly yes. I dont think I'll ever get over this social anxiety thing until I have work/I work.

Even then, I may not get over it. 26 yrs of crippling lonliness and being bullied does make a man feel not "good enough." for others at least. For the men who want to go around bullying poeple like me, calling me unmanly and a wimp.

Last Edited by bannedfornoreason on 08/07/2012 06:10 PM