NASA admits that Mars Curiosity landing site Earth-like? Is it TOOOOO Earth-like?

Let's apply the usual rules of science, history, and law to this case.

Science requires independent reproducibility. A truly independent party must reproduce the experiment using the same setup. Unless/until that happens, the claimed result must be considered dubious (at best), and useless to science.

History requires independent corroboration. A truly independent party must confirm the event by direct observation. Unless/until that happens, the claimed event must be considered dubious (at best), and useless to history.

Law requires testimony under oath and cross-examination. Eyewitnesses must recount their observations under oath (i.e., threat of jail time for perjury), and must submit to questioning on the case from opponents. Unless/until that happens, the assertion has no legal basis.

NASA's alleged accomplishments fail all three tests.

I guess you're free to put up your $2.5 billion to send something independent along side theirs to assure yourself that they're not lying. hehe

we do not need science to tell us that something is true.

we need air to breath. science does not need to prove it, for it to be true. There are undeniable science facts.

Still. The moon landing was faked and the mars landing probably is too.

Why spend millions to go to mars when the world ends in a few months? millions better spent on bunkers.

yep. looks stagged, like appollo missions & 9/11 & OKCB & Fast & Furious & Batman Shootings & ....