Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,890 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,013,853
Pageviews Today: 1,333,448Threads Today: 281Posts Today: 5,439
01:01 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21812760
Panama
08/12/2012 05:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
All the shills left the room because they know they lost the debate.

Mr. Fubar is the last flunkie here trying to save the ship but he can't win an argument.

The bottom line is the moon landing was a HOAX.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21812760




Mr FubarMan is trying to derail this thread, now it picks on "clouds" cause he CAN'T explain the tracks issue in pictures.

One thing is for sure:

It's impossible to have it like these pictures show.

Impossible.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154


Moon landing was fake. You have provided conclusive proof.
clappa
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21594154
Portugal
08/12/2012 05:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
Fubar,

Start by explaining this one:

[link to bp3.blogger.com]

And keep in mind what YOU posted in page 1 about the dust....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1232278
Czech Republic
08/12/2012 05:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
People who are 40 years and under just don't believe that humans have been on the moon. It has never happened in their lifetime. Something that awesome should have happened again (and again) in 40 years.

If the US can spend 1.2 Trillion dollars on Defense each year, then the US could have easily afforded to build a lunar base by now. Apollo made it look like it was easy to accomplish sans Apollo 13.

But instead they built shuttles and a space station, when a badass satellite is right there and easily accessible (according to 1970 technology).
 Quoting: +9 21360789




Mmmm nope!
Peope who are 40 years and under are just not yet that much brainwashed like older ones. Those youger are using their common sense and logic.
We did something extraordinary 40 years ago and we are still not capable of doing it again ? Did we somehow lost that "awesome" old technology ?
Humans make better and better things, we are not losing things and forgetting how to do/make something.

This must be the only example of technology going backwards in the whole existance of the human kind.
FubarMan

User ID: 20621002
United States
08/12/2012 05:12 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
Fubar,

Start by explaining this one:

[link to bp3.blogger.com]

And keep in mind what YOU posted in page 1 about the dust....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154


Because it was lifted into place by the astronauts, then assembled. It was placed, not rolled into that position.

Here is the video.

[link to www.youtube.com]
nzreva (OP)

User ID: 19624091
United States
08/12/2012 05:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
People who are 40 years and under just don't believe that humans have been on the moon. It has never happened in their lifetime. Something that awesome should have happened again (and again) in 40 years.

If the US can spend 1.2 Trillion dollars on Defense each year, then the US could have easily afforded to build a lunar base by now. Apollo made it look like it was easy to accomplish sans Apollo 13.

But instead they built shuttles and a space station, when a badass satellite is right there and easily accessible (according to 1970 technology).
 Quoting: +9 21360789




Mmmm nope!
Peope who are 40 years and under are just not yet that much brainwashed like older ones. Those youger are using their common sense and logic.
We did something extraordinary 40 years ago and we are still not capable of doing it again ? Did we somehow lost that "awesome" old technology ?
Humans make better and better things, we are not losing things and forgetting how to do/make something.

This must be the only example of technology going backwards in the whole existance of the human kind.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1232278


I am over 40 I am the OP
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21594154
Portugal
08/12/2012 05:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
Fubar,

Start by explaining this one:

[link to bp3.blogger.com]

And keep in mind what YOU posted in page 1 about the dust....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154


Because it was lifted into place by the astronauts, then assembled. It was placed, not rolled into that position.

Here is the video.

[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: FubarMan


So why there are tracks in there BEFORE they assembled it:

[link to bp3.blogger.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21281781
United States
08/12/2012 05:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
Another one suckered. Success!
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21603061


Moonhoaxtards - dumb as a box of errr... moonhoaxtards
 Quoting: seethelight


^^^^^^^^^^^
THIS

tounge
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 11360402
United States
08/12/2012 05:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
bsflag

Dub over and a moontard website..


Why do they post this stupid shit..putin
FubarMan

User ID: 20621002
United States
08/12/2012 05:25 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
Fubar,

Start by explaining this one:

[link to bp3.blogger.com]

And keep in mind what YOU posted in page 1 about the dust....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154


Because it was lifted into place by the astronauts, then assembled. It was placed, not rolled into that position.

Here is the video.

[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: FubarMan


So why there are tracks in there BEFORE they assembled it:

[link to bp3.blogger.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154


The nutbar that wrote that silly article used words like seemed as though, it was unpacked. Look at the video, not some still, the answer is right in front of your nose LOL! It was unpacked and making tracks.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18885064
United States
08/12/2012 05:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
Who even really gives a fuck anymore, you can debate this all night and day long, but in the end, NOTHING will come of it. So just shut the fuck up, all of you, this is going nowhere. Debate something that actually matters.
nzreva (OP)

User ID: 19624091
United States
08/12/2012 05:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
Who even really gives a fuck anymore, you can debate this all night and day long, but in the end, NOTHING will come of it. So just shut the fuck up, all of you, this is going nowhere. Debate something that actually matters.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18885064


over 9,300 and counting
You can start a form supporting the moon landing and we will see how that goes. GLP cares.

Last Edited by nzreva on 08/12/2012 05:31 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21594154
Portugal
08/12/2012 05:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
Fubar,

Start by explaining this one:

[link to bp3.blogger.com]

And keep in mind what YOU posted in page 1 about the dust....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154


Because it was lifted into place by the astronauts, then assembled. It was placed, not rolled into that position.

Here is the video.

[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: FubarMan


So why there are tracks in there BEFORE they assembled it:

[link to bp3.blogger.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154


The nutbar that wrote that silly article used words like seemed as though, it was unpacked. Look at the video, not some still, the answer is right in front of your nose LOL! It was unpacked and making tracks.
 Quoting: FubarMan


Now hold one!

It's a original NASA picture showing tracks BEFORE the rover assembly.

If you ain't have an answer for this one, just zip it and we'll assume it's the definitive proof this was made in a studio.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21594154
Portugal
08/12/2012 05:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
Who even really gives a fuck anymore, you can debate this all night and day long, but in the end, NOTHING will come of it. So just shut the fuck up, all of you, this is going nowhere. Debate something that actually matters.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18885064


Fuck off braindead.

Go wack some and watch tv.
nzreva (OP)

User ID: 19624091
United States
08/12/2012 05:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
...


Because it was lifted into place by the astronauts, then assembled. It was placed, not rolled into that position.

Here is the video.

[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: FubarMan


So why there are tracks in there BEFORE they assembled it:

[link to bp3.blogger.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154


The nutbar that wrote that silly article used words like seemed as though, it was unpacked. Look at the video, not some still, the answer is right in front of your nose LOL! It was unpacked and making tracks.
 Quoting: FubarMan


Now hold one!

It's a original NASA picture showing tracks BEFORE the rover assembly.

If you ain't have an answer for this one, just zip it and we'll assume it's the definitive proof this was made in a studio.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154


Watch the Video's
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18885064
United States
08/12/2012 05:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
I don't support the moon landing, its obviously fake. That doesn't change the fact that this 10 page discussion is POINTLESS.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18885064
United States
08/12/2012 05:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
Who even really gives a fuck anymore, you can debate this all night and day long, but in the end, NOTHING will come of it. So just shut the fuck up, all of you, this is going nowhere. Debate something that actually matters.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18885064


Fuck off braindead.

Go wack some and watch tv.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154


LOL. Brain dead is two words by the way. Maybe you should spend less time debating pointless bullshit and read a book.
FubarMan

User ID: 20621002
United States
08/12/2012 05:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
...


Because it was lifted into place by the astronauts, then assembled. It was placed, not rolled into that position.

Here is the video.

[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: FubarMan


So why there are tracks in there BEFORE they assembled it:

[link to bp3.blogger.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154


The nutbar that wrote that silly article used words like seemed as though, it was unpacked. Look at the video, not some still, the answer is right in front of your nose LOL! It was unpacked and making tracks.
 Quoting: FubarMan


Now hold one!

It's a original NASA picture showing tracks BEFORE the rover assembly.

If you ain't have an answer for this one, just zip it and we'll assume it's the definitive proof this was made in a studio.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154


You are right. When someone posts a random picture and the title of the article has a question mark and uses scientific factual words such as seems and appears would indicate you have enough proof for yourself.

By the way do you believe in global warming?
nzreva (OP)

User ID: 19624091
United States
08/12/2012 05:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
James A. Van Allen,........

The radiation detector recorded two belts of charged particles trapped by Earth’s magnetic field. One belt is 400 to 4,000 miles above the surface, and the other is 9,000 to 15,000 miles above the Equator, curving toward the magnetic poles. Further evidence for the encircling radiation was detected with Dr. Van Allen’s instruments carried aloft aboard Explorer 2 and Explorer 3.


Dr. Van Allen said Apollo was of primary value as a television spectacular, rather than for its scientific achievements.
[link to www.nytimes.com]

Last Edited by nzreva on 08/12/2012 05:42 PM
FubarMan

User ID: 20621002
United States
08/12/2012 05:43 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
James A. Van Allen,........

The radiation detector recorded two belts of charged particles trapped by Earth’s magnetic field. One belt is 400 to 4,000 miles above the surface, and the other is 9,000 to 15,000 miles above the Equator, curving toward the magnetic poles. Further evidence for the encircling radiation was detected with Dr. Van Allen’s instruments carried aloft aboard Explorer 2 and Explorer 3.


Dr. Van Allen said Apollo was of primary value as a television spectacular, rather than for its scientific achievements.
[link to www.nytimes.com]
 Quoting: nzreva


Claim: Apollo astronauts could not have travelled to the moon as a giant belt of lethal space radiation would have frazzled them.

Why it's nonsense: These so called Van Allen belts, where the Earth's magnetic field collects solar radiation, would be dangerous only if people were to hang out there for several days. The astronauts whizzed through in a matter of hours, and received a radiation dose similar to an X-ray. "You can pass through quite safely as long as you don't linger too long," Millard says.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15756389
Japan
08/12/2012 05:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
bookmarked
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21816729
Panama
08/12/2012 05:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
No way the mission would be televised live unless the outcome was guaranteed. FAKE.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21672021
Australia
08/12/2012 05:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
Fubar,

Start by explaining this one:

[link to bp3.blogger.com]

And keep in mind what YOU posted in page 1 about the dust....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21594154


Because it was lifted into place by the astronauts, then assembled. It was placed, not rolled into that position.

Here is the video.

[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: FubarMan


haha most stupid explanation ever
nzreva (OP)

User ID: 19624091
United States
08/12/2012 05:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
James A. Van Allen,........

The radiation detector recorded two belts of charged particles trapped by Earth’s magnetic field. One belt is 400 to 4,000 miles above the surface, and the other is 9,000 to 15,000 miles above the Equator, curving toward the magnetic poles. Further evidence for the encircling radiation was detected with Dr. Van Allen’s instruments carried aloft aboard Explorer 2 and Explorer 3.


Dr. Van Allen said Apollo was of primary value as a television spectacular, rather than for its scientific achievements.
[link to www.nytimes.com]
 Quoting: nzreva


Claim: Apollo astronauts could not have travelled to the moon as a giant belt of lethal space radiation would have frazzled them.

Why it's nonsense: These so called Van Allen belts, where the Earth's magnetic field collects solar radiation, would be dangerous only if people were to hang out there for several days. The astronauts whizzed through in a matter of hours, and received a radiation dose similar to an X-ray. "You can pass through quite safely as long as you don't linger too long," Millard says.
 Quoting: FubarMan


Had nothing to do with the money that would be cut off if they did not make it to the moon. Or the 7 dead astronauts
who some were vocal not agreeing with the project, watch the video's
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21672021
Australia
08/12/2012 05:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
nzreva (OP)

User ID: 19624091
United States
08/12/2012 06:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21672021


Have they taken this to court?
This is something to follow to see if it goes to court.
nzreva (OP)

User ID: 19624091
United States
08/12/2012 06:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
James A. Van Allen,........

The radiation detector recorded two belts of charged particles trapped by Earth’s magnetic field. One belt is 400 to 4,000 miles above the surface, and the other is 9,000 to 15,000 miles above the Equator, curving toward the magnetic poles. Further evidence for the encircling radiation was detected with Dr. Van Allen’s instruments carried aloft aboard Explorer 2 and Explorer 3.


Dr. Van Allen said Apollo was of primary value as a television spectacular, rather than for its scientific achievements.
[link to www.nytimes.com]
 Quoting: nzreva


Claim: Apollo astronauts could not have travelled to the moon as a giant belt of lethal space radiation would have frazzled them.

Why it's nonsense: These so called Van Allen belts, where the Earth's magnetic field collects solar radiation, would be dangerous only if people were to hang out there for several days. The astronauts whizzed through in a matter of hours, and received a radiation dose similar to an X-ray. "You can pass through quite safely as long as you don't linger too long," Millard says.
 Quoting: FubarMan


You made the claim not me I am qoting Dr. Van Allen, you are putting your own spin on it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4284512
United States
08/12/2012 06:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
It is scam.

People who under stand facts and science understand that Americans landed on the moon.

In 1958 Skunk Works designed a plane that flew faster than a 30-06 bullet for extended periods. The engines were an odd hybrid of a turbo jet and pulse jet with a retracting nose cone to stifle the effects of shock-waves. A decade previous they were dropping nuclear weapons on cities. They had the technology and they went.
 Quoting: FubarMan


you dont know that shit. you do NOT know
Goob

User ID: 13672072
United States
08/12/2012 06:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13804718


Wow, I just watched it so informative.
 Quoting: nzreva


Indeed, very interesting.
MatrixLNIN11

User ID: 21310346
United States
08/12/2012 06:20 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.

In the video 6min 20 secs interview
General Walters dies, at 85, in the night after a French interview that was going to expose details about the first moon walk, it was scheduled for the next day he did not survive the night.

6min 20 secs into video
[link to mountzion144.ning.com] share_post
Listen to what the New York Herald tribune says in the video. More
[link to thebodyofjesusthenazoraion.com]
 Quoting: nzreva


TOMMY B

User ID: 21693930
United States
08/12/2012 06:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow.
On Dave's web he has written a very good and long article about the moon landings. In there is a description of the men who were in charge of the mission taking a trip to Alaska the year before where they found "moon rocks" which they used to give away after the missions. Moon rocks are from the moon, they landed here due to pieces of the moon being knocked off do to hits and entering our atmosphere.

[link to www.davesweb.cnchost.com]

And yet, despite the fact that it was a relatively benign lie, there is a tremendous reluctance among the American people to let go of the notion that we sent men to the Moon. There are a couple of reasons for that, one of them being that there is a romanticized notion that those were great years – years when one was proud to be an American. And in this day and age, people need that kind of romanticized nostalgia to cling to.

But that is not the main reason that people cling so tenaciously, often even angrily, to what is essentially the adult version of Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy. What primarily motivates them is fear. But it is not the lie itself that scares people; it is what that lie says about the world around us and how it really functions. For if NASA was able to pull off such an outrageous hoax before the entire world, and then keep that lie in place for four decades, what does that say about the control of the information we receive? What does that say about the media, and the scientific community, and the educational community, and all the other institutions we depend on to tell us the truth? What does that say about the very nature of the world we live in?

That is what scares the hell out of people and prevents them from even considering the possibility that they could have been so thoroughly duped. It’s not being lied to about the Moon landings that people have a problem with, it is the realization that comes with that revelation: if they could lie about that, they could lie about anything.

It has been my experience that the vast majority of the people who truly believe in the Moon landings know virtually nothing about the alleged missions. And when confronted with some of the more implausible aspects of those alleged missions, the most frequently offered argument is the one that every ‘conspiracy theorist’ has heard at least a thousand times: “That can’t possibly be true because there is no way that a lie that big could have been covered up all this time … too many people would have known about it … yadda, yadda, yadda.”

But what if your own eyes and your innate (though suppressed) ability to think critically and independently tell you that what all the institutions of the State insist is true is actually a lie? What do you do then? Do you trust in your own cognitive abilities, or do you blindly follow authority and pretend as though everything can be explained away? If your worldview will not allow you to believe what you can see with your own eyes, then the problem, it would appear, is with your worldview. So do you change that worldview, or do you live in denial?

The Moon landing lie is unique among the big lies in another way as well: it is a lie that seemingly cannot be maintained indefinitely. Washington need never come clean on, say, the Kennedy assassinations. After all, they’ve been lying about the Lincoln assassination for nearly a century-and-a-half now and getting away with it. But the Moon landing hoax, I would think, has to have some kind of expiration date.

How many decades can pass, after all, without anyone coming even close to a reenactment before people start to catch on? Four obviously haven’t been enough, but how about five, or six, or seven? How about when we hit the 100-year anniversary?
 Quoting: stillhere


On Dave's web he has written a very good and long article about the moon landings. In there is a description of the men who were in charge of the mission taking a trip to Alaska the year before where they found "moon rocks" which they used to give away after the missions. Moon rocks are from the moon, they landed here due to pieces of the moon being knocked off do to hits and entering our atmosphere.

[link to www.davesweb.cnchost.com]

And yet, despite the fact that it was a relatively benign lie, there is a tremendous reluctance among the American people to let go of the notion that we sent men to the Moon. There are a couple of reasons for that, one of them being that there is a romanticized notion that those were great years – years when one was proud to be an American. And in this day and age, people need that kind of romanticized nostalgia to cling to.

But that is not the main reason that people cling so tenaciously, often even angrily, to what is essentially the adult version of Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy. What primarily motivates them is fear. But it is not the lie itself that scares people; it is what that lie says about the world around us and how it really functions. For if NASA was able to pull off such an outrageous hoax before the entire world, and then keep that lie in place for four decades, what does that say about the control of the information we receive? What does that say about the media, and the scientific community, and the educational community, and all the other institutions we depend on to tell us the truth? What does that say about the very nature of the world we live in?

That is what scares the hell out of people and prevents them from even considering the possibility that they could have been so thoroughly duped. It’s not being lied to about the Moon landings that people have a problem with, it is the realization that comes with that revelation: if they could lie about that, they could lie about anything.

It has been my experience that the vast majority of the people who truly believe in the Moon landings know virtually nothing about the alleged missions. And when confronted with some of the more implausible aspects of those alleged missions, the most frequently offered argument is the one that every ‘conspiracy theorist’ has heard at least a thousand times: “That can’t possibly be true because there is no way that a lie that big could have been covered up all this time … too many people would have known about it … yadda, yadda, yadda.”

But what if your own eyes and your innate (though suppressed) ability to think critically and independently tell you that what all the institutions of the State insist is true is actually a lie? What do you do then? Do you trust in your own cognitive abilities, or do you blindly follow authority and pretend as though everything can be explained away? If your worldview will not allow you to believe what you can see with your own eyes, then the problem, it would appear, is with your worldview. So do you change that worldview, or do you live in denial?

The Moon landing lie is unique among the big lies in another way as well: it is a lie that seemingly cannot be maintained indefinitely. Washington need never come clean on, say, the Kennedy assassinations. After all, they’ve been lying about the Lincoln assassination for nearly a century-and-a-half now and getting away with it. But the Moon landing hoax, I would think, has to have some kind of expiration date.

How many decades can pass, after all, without anyone coming even close to a reenactment before people start to catch on? Four obviously haven’t been enough, but how about five, or six, or seven? How about when we hit the 100-year anniversary?
 Quoting: stillhere


I was with you until the whole santa thing, now he isn't real either....some people have some nerve. Santatard!!!

News