Pro-Vaccine Immunologist Admits a Shocking Truth About Vaccines

[link to gaetacommunications.com]

Part Two: Pro-Vaccine Immunologist Admits Shocking Truths About Vaccines
Posted on February 8, 2012

A big thank you to all those who helped distribute the first post about this issue. It has gone viral, with over 7,300 likes on Facebook and dozens of repostings. This next excerpt, from the same vaccine panel of experts I participated in, confirms that the 24 recommended vaccines given in the first year of life can have no possible benefit, as infants cannot produce antibodies until about age one. I had made this statement in my morning presentation. At the panel Q & A that afternoon, a doctor came to the microphone to ask this highly-respected immunologist if what I had said was true. Here is the transcript and audio clip of this brief but remarkable exchange:

Immunologist: “So, in terms of the vaccines that are given at two months, four months and six months, right…”

Participant: “…there’s no protection.”

[snip]

WHY?

Nature thats why...


Mammas milk is the protection!

Ok, I just skimmed part one and two, and maybe I missed it, but I didn't see the name of this "pro-vaccine PhD immunologist" listed anywhere. The article would be a lot easier to believe if I was able to do some research about the person who supposedly agreed with what the anti-vaccine guy was saying.

It might be in the audio part of the article in the first part.

I read a bit more closely and found this-

"She declined to be identified in my presentations, including this post, perhaps because she knows that anyone who speaks the truth about vaccines is savaged by the medical establishment and their compliant lapdogs in the mainstream media."

While I agree with that reasoning, it doesn't help the cause much. I was hoping to be able to add this to my "anti-vaccine" folder to show my girlfriend and others who are on the fence about vaccines, but without the name of that PhD, I don't think it carries much weight.

Watch carefully parents, there is push in DC to remove the religious right to refuse, its gaining momentum.

The notion that you're "training" the parents to bring kids in for immunizations by giving them pointless immunizations in the first year, is a perfectly acceptable concept of social engineering in medicine. Obviously, it's a big rip-off that benefits clinicians and vaccine makers financially. In medicine, you will generally find that "social engineering" reasoning and profits go hand-in-hand.

They wouldn't do things like this if there was no money changing hands over the unnecessary vaccines and clinic visits.

In the first year of life, the immune system is not developed enough to reject/attack things on its own. Very early immunizations (<1 year old) is rather pointless.

Great thread as usual Mopar!

I think it also has to do with $$$$ as well!

Here are some doctors that speak against vaccinations as well-

homefirst.com

drtenpenny.com

gordonresearch.com

exemptmychild.com

So, in other words, complete hearsay.


OP has a track record of posting complete bullshit.