Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,054 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,714,348
Pageviews Today: 2,506,297Threads Today: 562Posts Today: 15,582
11:56 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22073276
United States
08/16/2012 08:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
Muzzles thread

[link to www.newscientist.com]

On 12 April 2011, a month after the tsunami struck, Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency announced that it was raising the grading of the Fukushima Daiichi event from 5 to 7 - the highest level on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES). This helped to create the misleading impression that the event was as bad as Chernobyl, and has since been exploited in anti-nuclear propaganda despite the fact that there is no possibility that the physical health consequences of Fukushima Daiichi will be anywhere near as bad as those of Chernobyl.

As far as anyone knows, no member of the public received a significant dose of radiation attributable to the Fukushima Daiichi reactor emergency and no physical health effects of radiation should be expected.

On top of that, it has been estimated that about 4000 people will die (or may already have died) from radiation-induced cancer, including workers exposed directly to radiation, and members of the public exposed to the huge release of radioactive material from the reactor. About 4000 cases of thyroid cancer, which typically kills about 5 per cent of people who get it, have been attributed to inhalation and ingestion of radioactive iodine by children.
____________________

Of course, neither may be finished with their damage yet.
 Quoting: Muzzle


Thread: Fukushima does not compare to Chernobyl
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22073276
United States
08/16/2012 08:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
Atom Boys

Thread: "Stop Comparing Fukushima to Chernobyl"
drhoecker
User ID: 21362211
United States
08/16/2012 09:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
you know what grinds my gears?
i am a verified seer who has a proven track record
of revealing future events ahead but am squashed to general knowledge
i told the worlds govt's ahead about the nuclear accidents
and even japan was contacted by three years.
verified in emails but they just did not listen to me.
then thirty days ahead the American Hopis were told even.
they were told that four nuclear cooling towers were coming down from inside as i saw it ahead.
they said they hoped not but it did anyway.
glp was told thirty minutes ahead of tsunami,no one cared.
such is mankind now,uncaring creatures.
i told ahead i would knock down the monument in DC to the white house even. to verify my truth over god.
it cracked the cornerstone out,they rejected it.
the monument pyramid witnessed for god by spitting out the cornerstone,they concreted it over instead.
that was to counter the administration threatning me with treason,for what? telling future ahead.

believe it or not,
i have the beast that has
"wings of an eagle,feet of a bear,
claws like talons,serpent tail,
body of an ox,head of a lion.
yes my brothers,the lost stone.

it reveals that one who does thye act.

love my relatives,love.
the answer
they kill the messenger in fear
alone the gift can change outcome
but man creates his own destruction

i cant change anything
man too stuck on self to hear truth
so the creator will step in and
we will go through earth events unseen.
so we dont kill ourselves.

i came ,i saw ,i revealed,
after i witness then and only then will i rest
drhoecker
User ID: 21362211
United States
08/16/2012 09:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
People who don't remember Chernobyl or don't
know the Facts of the Catastrophe in Soviet Russia
may think so but is this the so called "Reality"?

Imo. doubtful, very doubtful!

From my personal Experience i would not think so,
Chernobyl was/ is much bigger and affected much
more People than F'Shima!

But, let' s wait and see, we can't change both!
 Quoting: the mighty Atom


Wrong. Here's why.

- Fukushima has FOUR nuclear reactors - Not 1 like Chernobyl. Fukushima has had at LEAST 3 meltdowns, currently, maybe 4. But definitely not just one.

- Estimated 85 times more Cesium (Cs-137) stored at Fukushima-Daiichi than at Chernobyl.

- Each “reactor top” pool holds 3450 fuel rod assemblies. The common pool holds 6291 fuel rod assemblies.

- There is often confusion between "fuel assemblies" and "fuel rods". 15,558 fuel assemblies at Fuku.. Each fuel assembly has 63 fuel rods.. That's over 900,000 spent fuel rods.

- Fukushima plant has a total of around 1760 tonnes (3.5 million lbs.) of fresh and used nuclear fuel on site, and an unknown amount has been damaged. The Chernobyl reactor had only 180 tonnes (360,000 lbs.) .”

- Reactor no 3 burns MOX fuel that contains a mix of plutonium and uranium. Chernobyl did not contain MOX (mixed oxide) fuels. In fact a MOX reactor has never, ever, been involved in a nuclear catastrophe. Except for now, at this present time, at Fukushima.

- When Chernobyl blew, it was only about 60 tons of uranium. This Japanese reactor has hundreds of tons of MOX fuel, which has PLUTONIUM in it. There are not 1... but 3 reactors which have blown up.

- There us HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF TONS of spent nuclear fuel that has been exposed to the air. It has not been kept cool.


That is simply the quickest and most efficient way to break it down and make it VERY clear.

 Quoting: Slick Vick


3-11-2011 plus three and a half years equals 9-11-2014
1290 days.then if we survive the next 45 days we are very lucky indeed.
or not/ no one listens to the seer anyway even when he told ahead the event that we could have changed
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22073276
United States
08/16/2012 09:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
A YEAR AGO WHEN WE FIRST DID AN INTERVIEW AFTER MARCH 11, 2011, YOU SAID THIS HAD THE POTENTIAL TO BE GREATER THAN CHERNOBYL. WHAT DO YOU THINK TODAY?

Well, there are three different kinds of gases that were released. The noble gases are definitely worse than Chernobyl. There are scientific papers out that show this was THREE TIMES WORSE than Chernobyl as far as releases of noble gases.

The other is radioactive iodine and radioactive cesium. It’s a numbers game because nobody measured this stuff. There were no detectors working. They all lost their power and got blown to smithereens. The nuclear industry is trying to push the numbers to show that it is less than Chernobyl, but when I do the numbers, it says as bad or worse than Chernobyl. But Chernobyl was awful! So we’re comparing degrees of awfulness, but I think the noble gas data in Japan shows that it was three times worse than Chernobyl. [...]

[link to www.earthfiles.com]

[link to enenews.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4097142


Thread: GUNDERSEN - Nuclear Expert on Top US Radio Show: ‘When I do the numbers, it says Fukushima is as bad or worse than Chernobyl’ (AUDIO)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22073276
United States
08/16/2012 09:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
The severity of Japan’s Fukushima nuclear disaster may be as bad as or worse than Chernobyl, an American nuclear expert warned Sunday.

Arnold Gundersen, a former nuclear power industry executive, said it was clear to him within two days of the Japan earthquake and tsunami that “Fukushima was as bad as or worse than Chernobyl.” [...]

Gundersen, now chief engineer of the energy consulting company Fairewinds Associates, said he believed that Fukushima was 10 times worse than the 1986 Chernobyl meltdown [...]

Gundersen on Fukushima vs Chernobyl

* Chernobyl was a single reactor running at about 7 percent capacity when ruptured
* [Fukushima] had three reactors running at 100 percent capacity and seven other reactors with spent fuel pools that were crippled
* Chernobyl stopped releasing radioactive material after about two weeks [...] this is not the case at Fukushima one year on

Gundersen on Cancers and Other Health Problems

* Although there have been no deaths related to the Fukushima meltdown to date, over the next 20 years there would be about 1 million additional cancers and other health problems from the accident
* “But even in Tokyo most people think it is over and they survived it. But with the latency periods of these cancers it’s going to pop up 20 years out and people will wonder where it came from”

[link to www.chinadaily.com.cn]

[link to enenews.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12279308
citizenperth
FUKUSHIMA, GLPTARD 24/7/365

User ID: 22099192
Australia
08/16/2012 09:38 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
Like I've predicted all along... the slow release of information was paramount.

Today's local newspaper had in the international news the butterfly story freom Japan.

The stories about the magnitude will be with us for a very longtime.

The more we hear, the less likely we all are to be in denial about the magnitude.

... breaking it gently is still acrime....

AB?... yer gunna run out of excuses.....
It's life as we know it, but only just.
My Fukushima Site:
[link to citizenperth.wordpress.com]
sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie

GLP's best Fuku thread: Thread: *** Fukushima *** and other nuclear-----updates and links
twitter: @citizenperth
“If I had an hour to solve a problem and my life depended on it, I would use the first 55 minutes determining the proper question to ask, for once I knew the proper question, I could solve the problem in less than five minutes.”
- Albert Einstein
jadksn
User ID: 18789637
United States
08/16/2012 10:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
I find it highly suspicious that this atom guy registered his account only after the Fukushima incident, and only posts in Fukushima related threads. He's like half of the japanese userbase on here.
the mighty Atom

User ID: 21944378
Japan
08/16/2012 10:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
I find it highly suspicious that this atom guy registered his account only after the Fukushima incident, and only posts in Fukushima related threads. He's like half of the japanese userbase on here.
 Quoting: jadksn 18789637


Because we don't like to talk about the Size
of our Dicks or the Periode of our Friends,
you like it and we don't!

Fukushima is small compared to Chernobyl!
G.Y.!B.E.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22101534
United States
08/16/2012 10:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22073276
United States
08/16/2012 11:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
I find it highly suspicious that this atom guy registered his account only after the Fukushima incident, and only posts in Fukushima related threads. He's like half of the japanese userbase on here.
 Quoting: jadksn 18789637


Because we don't like to talk about the Size
of our Dicks or the Periode of our Friends,
you like it and we don't!

Fukushima is small compared to Chernobyl!
 Quoting: the mighty Atom


What do you mean we? You're not Japanese.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22073276
United States
08/16/2012 11:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
I find it highly suspicious that this atom guy registered his account only after the Fukushima incident, and only posts in Fukushima related threads. He's like half of the japanese userbase on here.
 Quoting: jadksn 18789637


Because we don't like to talk about the Size
of our Dicks or the Periode of our Friends,
you like it and we don't!

Fukushima is small compared to Chernobyl!
 Quoting: the mighty Atom


What do you mean we? You're not Japanese.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22073276
jadksn
User ID: 18789637
United States
08/16/2012 11:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
I find it highly suspicious that this atom guy registered his account only after the Fukushima incident, and only posts in Fukushima related threads. He's like half of the japanese userbase on here.
 Quoting: jadksn 18789637


Because we don't like to talk about the Size
of our Dicks or the Periode of our Friends,
you like it and we don't!

Fukushima is small compared to Chernobyl!
 Quoting: the mighty Atom


I literally have no idea what you're trying to say. There is evidence that speaks to the contrary. You just reek of disinfo.
the mighty Atom

User ID: 22116874
Japan
08/17/2012 06:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
@ jadksn,

there is much more Information that the Accident in
Fukushima Daiichi is much smaller than Chernobyl!

Not so many People are saying the Opposite.

I hate both Accidents and i hate the human Ignorance!
G.Y.!B.E.
Slick Vick

User ID: 15311505
United States
08/17/2012 08:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
@ jadksn,

there is much more Information that the Accident in
Fukushima Daiichi is much smaller than Chernobyl!

Not so many People are saying the Opposite.

I hate both Accidents and i hate the human Ignorance!
 Quoting: the mighty Atom


You're the most ignorant one on this thread.. How about you go move to Fuku than. You can blog from the doctors office where 70% of children have lumps on their thyroid. You can blog from the hospital where they REFUSE to test for radiation sickness when they're unable to determine why people are dying. Yes, it's actually been mandated that radiation tests are NOT ALLOWED as a form of diagnosis for the ill there.

Maybe at the time Ukraine had enough decency to warn, to admit it to their people that it was a disaster..

Japan, with already having to deal with Hiroshima/Nagasaki was too proud and too paranoid and too far in denial to admit what happened.

Reactor #3 EXPLODED, and it was not a hydrogen explosion, that's already been debunked. Regardless, hydrogen explosion or not, it exploded sending fuel rods/assemblies miles away and exposing raw MOX fuel (plutonium 229) which is much worse than the fuel at chernobyl.
Slick Vick

User ID: 15311505
United States
08/17/2012 08:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
@ jadksn,

there is much more Information that the Accident in
Fukushima Daiichi is much smaller than Chernobyl!

Not so many People are saying the Opposite.

I hate both Accidents and i hate the human Ignorance!
 Quoting: the mighty Atom


You're the most ignorant one on this thread.. How about you go move to Fuku than. You can blog from the doctors office where 70% of children have lumps on their thyroid. You can blog from the hospital where they REFUSE to test for radiation sickness when they're unable to determine why people are dying. Yes, it's actually been mandated that radiation tests are NOT ALLOWED as a form of diagnosis for the ill there.

Maybe at the time Ukraine had enough decency to warn, to admit it to their people that it was a disaster..

Japan, with already having to deal with Hiroshima/Nagasaki was too proud and too paranoid and too far in denial to admit what happened.

Reactor #3 EXPLODED, and it was not a hydrogen explosion, that's already been debunked. Regardless, hydrogen explosion or not, it exploded sending fuel rods/assemblies miles away and exposing raw MOX fuel (plutonium 229) which is much worse than the fuel at chernobyl.
 Quoting: Slick Vick


Not to mention the other reactor explosion and the meltdown of at LEAST 3 of them, for an ongoing time period, still today, and the continual "washing" of the nuclear cooling water into the sea..

Are you even aware that certain vineyards for producing wine in California actually closed because there were tests showing signs of unsafe radiation in their grapes that was PROVED to be from Fukushima?

YES, Chernobyl was a terrible horror. But the facts come out after years and years, when nobody cares as much. However, Fuku is worse, will be proven to be worse, and is affecting a larger area for an ongoing period of time.

Japan government along with TEPCO (yakuza, or the Japanese Mafia IS TEPCO) are hiding deformed babies, dying people, dying and deformed animals, etc. because they are embarrased, scared and most importantly, LIARS.
citizenperth
FUKUSHIMA, GLPTARD 24/7/365

User ID: 21447419
Australia
08/17/2012 06:34 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
@ jadksn,

there is much more Information that the Accident in
Fukushima Daiichi is much smaller than Chernobyl!

Not so many People are saying the Opposite.

I hate both Accidents and i hate the human Ignorance!
 Quoting: the mighty Atom


You're the most ignorant one on this thread.. How about you go move to Fuku than. You can blog from the doctors office where 70% of children have lumps on their thyroid. You can blog from the hospital where they REFUSE to test for radiation sickness when they're unable to determine why people are dying. Yes, it's actually been mandated that radiation tests are NOT ALLOWED as a form of diagnosis for the ill there.

Maybe at the time Ukraine had enough decency to warn, to admit it to their people that it was a disaster..

Japan, with already having to deal with Hiroshima/Nagasaki was too proud and too paranoid and too far in denial to admit what happened.

Reactor #3 EXPLODED, and it was not a hydrogen explosion, that's already been debunked. Regardless, hydrogen explosion or not, it exploded sending fuel rods/assemblies miles away and exposing raw MOX fuel (plutonium 229) which is much worse than the fuel at chernobyl.
 Quoting: Slick Vick


Not to mention the other reactor explosion and the meltdown of at LEAST 3 of them, for an ongoing time period, still today, and the continual "washing" of the nuclear cooling water into the sea..

Are you even aware that certain vineyards for producing wine in California actually closed because there were tests showing signs of unsafe radiation in their grapes that was PROVED to be from Fukushima?

YES, Chernobyl was a terrible horror. But the facts come out after years and years, when nobody cares as much. However, Fuku is worse, will be proven to be worse, and is affecting a larger area for an ongoing period of time.

Japan government along with TEPCO (yakuza, or the Japanese Mafia IS TEPCO) are hiding deformed babies, dying people, dying and deformed animals, etc. because they are embarrased, scared and most importantly, LIARS.
 Quoting: Slick Vick


don't tell AB that... he'll say

but chernobyl was a basin!
that we saw was huge!
enough talking now!
we need to stay focused on other things!
there is sand in my shoe!
i love fukushima!
i holiday there! but ran away!
you know nothing!

etc...etc....
It's life as we know it, but only just.
My Fukushima Site:
[link to citizenperth.wordpress.com]
sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie

GLP's best Fuku thread: Thread: *** Fukushima *** and other nuclear-----updates and links
twitter: @citizenperth
“If I had an hour to solve a problem and my life depended on it, I would use the first 55 minutes determining the proper question to ask, for once I knew the proper question, I could solve the problem in less than five minutes.”
- Albert Einstein
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22073276
United States
08/18/2012 07:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22073276
United States
08/19/2012 03:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
bump
the mighty Atom

User ID: 22174645
Japan
08/19/2012 03:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
Level 8: Multi-source major nuclear accident requiring international
assistance and monitoring

There is no "Level 8" and even when we create one
we could say exactly the same about Chernobyl,
they are even sooooooo poor that they needed to
wait more than one Decade until the EU paid the
new and better protective Shelter!

Your Argumentation failed!


Last Edited by the mighty Atom on 08/19/2012 03:53 PM
G.Y.!B.E.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22073276
United States
08/19/2012 10:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
@ jadksn,

there is much more Information that the Accident in
Fukushima Daiichi is much smaller than Chernobyl!

Not so many People are saying the Opposite.

I hate both Accidents and i hate the human Ignorance!
 Quoting: the mighty Atom


You're the most ignorant one on this thread.. How about you go move to Fuku than. You can blog from the doctors office where 70% of children have lumps on their thyroid. You can blog from the hospital where they REFUSE to test for radiation sickness when they're unable to determine why people are dying. Yes, it's actually been mandated that radiation tests are NOT ALLOWED as a form of diagnosis for the ill there.

Maybe at the time Ukraine had enough decency to warn, to admit it to their people that it was a disaster..

Japan, with already having to deal with Hiroshima/Nagasaki was too proud and too paranoid and too far in denial to admit what happened.

Reactor #3 EXPLODED, and it was not a hydrogen explosion, that's already been debunked. Regardless, hydrogen explosion or not, it exploded sending fuel rods/assemblies miles away and exposing raw MOX fuel (plutonium 229) which is much worse than the fuel at chernobyl.
 Quoting: Slick Vick


Not to mention the other reactor explosion and the meltdown of at LEAST 3 of them, for an ongoing time period, still today, and the continual "washing" of the nuclear cooling water into the sea..

Are you even aware that certain vineyards for producing wine in California actually closed because there were tests showing signs of unsafe radiation in their grapes that was PROVED to be from Fukushima?

YES, Chernobyl was a terrible horror. But the facts come out after years and years, when nobody cares as much. However, Fuku is worse, will be proven to be worse, and is affecting a larger area for an ongoing period of time.

Japan government along with TEPCO (yakuza, or the Japanese Mafia IS TEPCO) are hiding deformed babies, dying people, dying and deformed animals, etc. because they are embarrased, scared and most importantly, LIARS.
 Quoting: Slick Vick
Slick Vick

User ID: 14849569
United States
08/19/2012 10:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
bump
citizenperth
FUKUSHIMA, GLPTARD 24/7/365

User ID: 21447419
Australia
08/19/2012 10:38 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
Level 8: Multi-source major nuclear accident requiring international
assistance and monitoring

There is no "Level 8" and even when we create one
we could say exactly the same about Chernobyl,
they are even sooooooo poor that they needed to
wait more than one Decade until the EU paid the
new and better protective Shelter!

Your Argumentation failed!

 Quoting: the mighty Atom


Argumentation

thats a new one, even for you!
where are your exclamation marks!



cough*

there is no level "8", because there was no need for one... until now.... use what little TEPCO left of your mind and imagine it in an applied statistical methedology you trolling shill.... or is that beyond? the levels are pointless, except to measure the severity of the situation which is far from under control even now.....

and btw, ty for the negative karma.... pssst, i won't give away your responses as they are self-evident.... you naughty little man... GRIN


shagging hentai is not good for your karma

hentaidoom

Last Edited by Citizenperth on 08/19/2012 10:42 PM
It's life as we know it, but only just.
My Fukushima Site:
[link to citizenperth.wordpress.com]
sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie

GLP's best Fuku thread: Thread: *** Fukushima *** and other nuclear-----updates and links
twitter: @citizenperth
“If I had an hour to solve a problem and my life depended on it, I would use the first 55 minutes determining the proper question to ask, for once I knew the proper question, I could solve the problem in less than five minutes.”
- Albert Einstein
Slick Vick

User ID: 15311505
United States
08/21/2012 10:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
Level 8: Multi-source major nuclear accident requiring international
assistance and monitoring

There is no "Level 8" and even when we create one
we could say exactly the same about Chernobyl,
they are even sooooooo poor that they needed to
wait more than one Decade until the EU paid the
new and better protective Shelter!

Your Argumentation failed!

 Quoting: the mighty Atom


This kid is probably the most consistent of all the nuclear shills..

And dumber than shit.
the mighty Atom

User ID: 22174645
Japan
08/21/2012 11:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
Level 8: Multi-source major nuclear accident requiring international
assistance and monitoring

There is no "Level 8" and even when we create one
we could say exactly the same about Chernobyl,
they are even sooooooo poor that they needed to
wait more than one Decade until the EU paid the
new and better protective Shelter!

Your Argumentation failed!

 Quoting: the mighty Atom


This kid is probably the most consistent of all the nuclear shills..

And dumber than shit.
 Quoting: Slick Vick


And you are a Nibiru Beliver,
go and listen to the Zetas
because you think that they tell
you the whole and full Truth,
you are a gullible Troll!

You Contribution in this Thread is wrong,
in every single Point!!!
G.Y.!B.E.
Slick Vick

User ID: 15311505
United States
08/21/2012 11:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
Level 8: Multi-source major nuclear accident requiring international
assistance and monitoring

There is no "Level 8" and even when we create one
we could say exactly the same about Chernobyl,
they are even sooooooo poor that they needed to
wait more than one Decade until the EU paid the
new and better protective Shelter!

Your Argumentation failed!

 Quoting: the mighty Atom


This kid is probably the most consistent of all the nuclear shills..

And dumber than shit.
 Quoting: Slick Vick


And you are a Nibiru Beliver,
go and listen to the Zetas
because you think that they tell
you the whole and full Truth,
you are a gullible Troll!

You Contribution in this Thread is wrong,
in every single Point!!!
 Quoting: the mighty Atom


Fuck the Zetas, and ESPECIALLY, fuck you.. You have ZERO clue what you speak of, which you already admitted is nothing more than your opinion, yet you SHILL all fucking day.

Actually, my points are 100% valid and I've contributed actual information to the thread unlike yourself. It's not my fault that you have too much pride to admit the reality of the situation.

I'll post them again below. I want you to read them, 3 times a day, repeating them in there entirety 10 times in a row each time. Morning, afternoon and night. This will help clear your cranium of the denial you suffer from.
Slick Vick

User ID: 15311505
United States
08/21/2012 11:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
For the shill kid who is in denial:



- Fukushima has FOUR nuclear reactors - Not 1 like Chernobyl. Fukushima has had at LEAST 3 meltdowns, currently, maybe 4. But definitely not just one.

- Estimated 85 times more Cesium (Cs-137) stored at Fukushima-Daiichi than at Chernobyl.

- Each “reactor top” pool holds 3450 fuel rod assemblies. The common pool holds 6291 fuel rod assemblies.

- There is often confusion between "fuel assemblies" and "fuel rods". 15,558 fuel assemblies at Fuku.. Each fuel assembly has 63 fuel rods.. That's over 900,000 spent fuel rods.

- Fukushima plant has a total of around 1760 tonnes (3.5 million lbs.) of fresh and used nuclear fuel on site, and an unknown amount has been damaged. The Chernobyl reactor had only 180 tonnes (360,000 lbs.) .”

- Reactor no 3 burns MOX fuel that contains a mix of plutonium and uranium. Chernobyl did not contain MOX (mixed oxide) fuels. In fact a MOX reactor has never, ever, been involved in a nuclear catastrophe. Except for now, at this present time, at Fukushima.

- When Chernobyl blew, it was only about 60 tons of uranium. This Japanese reactor has hundreds of tons of MOX fuel, which has PLUTONIUM in it. There are not 1... but 3 reactors which have blown up.

- There us HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF TONS of spent nuclear fuel that has been exposed to the air. It has not been kept cool.
the mighty Atom

User ID: 22174645
Japan
08/21/2012 11:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
@Nibirutard, you see, now you wrote some Facts,
except a Explosion of the Nr. 3 Containment.

There is no speaded MOX in the open Environmen!

Edit: need to add that it was not the Core that
exploded in Nr.1.,2 and 3.+4.,
they are "just" molten!

Edit Nr.2

and the spend Fuel Pools never dropped dry!

Last Edited by the mighty Atom on 08/21/2012 11:57 AM
G.Y.!B.E.
Slick Vick

User ID: 15311505
United States
08/21/2012 12:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
@Nibirutard, you see, now you wrote some Facts,
except a Explosion of the Nr. 3 Containment.

There is no speaded MOX in the open Environmen!

Edit: need to add that it was not the Core that
exploded in Nr.1.,2 and 3.+4.,
they are "just" molten!

Edit Nr.2

and the spend Fuel Pools never dropped dry!
 Quoting: the mighty Atom


I posted those on the first page, fukushillma.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22073276
United States
08/21/2012 05:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Radio: Fukushima ranked Level 8 on newly developed nuclear scale, above Chernobyl (CHART)
@Nibirutard, you see, now you wrote some Facts,
except a Explosion of the Nr. 3 Containment.

There is no speaded MOX in the open Environmen!

Edit: need to add that it was not the Core that
exploded in Nr.1.,2 and 3.+4.,
they are "just" molten!

Edit Nr.2

and the spend Fuel Pools never dropped dry!
 Quoting: the mighty Atom


I posted those on the first page, fukushillma.
 Quoting: Slick Vick


bump

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob