Why are so many aspies libertarian/Ayn Rand fans?

Personally Ayn Rand is not my cup of tea. I consider myself a market libertarian. Ayn Rand and those like her are more into anarchy. That shyt is wack yo! lol

Ayn Rand = the spokesperson for fifteen-year-old-boys everywhere who are angry at their hippy-ish single moms.

Japanese AC - spokespiece for pathetic sheeple asstard socialistic "gimme free stuff - I love you, Big Gov" losers everywhere.

Nope, not a commie, anything but, actually. I have libertarian leanings myself, although I wouldn't call myself a capital-L Libertarian. And personally I find Ayn Rand ridiculously cartoonish and simplistic. As I said, perfect for 15 year old boys.

Trying to forge non-existant links.

Butthurt aspie says what?

Ayn Rand? You mean Alisa Rosenbaum? Just another one of the usual suspects.

What is an aspies libertarian?

Because Aspergers is not a disorder, it is a re-ordering
of the irrational ethics that the majority of humanity consistently displays. It is selfish in the sense, that most parties must benefit otherwise there is no derivative, and thus the law of inertia until both the negative, and the positive can be respected.

Love, is the respectful nature of utilizing the negative
and transforming it into a positive connotation.

Brute, and Brains complement each other. Each man has his reasons, and a reason behind every action. He acts for his own self interests, but it interests him that he is able to be apart of history in saving someones life, even in a disasterous event like Hurricane Sandy. To be apart of history, in exchange for a helping hand in order to continue the derivative and one man works while the other creates policies. However, this work would not exist without policies, and policies would not exist without work to be completed.

An idea is not formed without the construction of materials, and construction of materials are not formed without the idea.

Just because Ayn Rand was on government assistance, doesn't mean she supports it. Just because someone is poor, doesn't mean they want to be poor. They're poor because of circumstances. What was down before, has the potential to go up, like any derivative.

Ayn rand was a mathmetician, a metaphysicist and the Physics (immaterial + material) (physical mathematics) is the prime existience of our paraidgm. To go around saying "I dont understand economics, or science, or math, or history." is like saying "I don't understand life or man" or to be ignorant of all of the arts that appreciate the beauty and the imperfections of all paradigms is ignorant in itself.

Aspergers is not a disorder but is treated like one because of the government programs after all of the war's and huge government spending.

As an aspie, my idea is to privatize war. If you want to hire boeings to infiltrate Iran for their oil, then your firm must raise enough capital.

Sure, do drugs, cocaine, crack, meth, heroine. As long as you can afford it. Maybe if we had more rational people, only 1% of this country would be drug addicts because only 1% can truly afford to be addicted to a financially draining asset. Just an example of rationality.

However. There is only one right, and one wrong. One right and left. Truth and a lie. Commodity and a currency. Neccessary and uneccessary. This is true capitalism. Ayn Rand is not in support of a completely free and ungoverned society full of derivatives. That would be chaotic (see the film 'We Live In Public') Because a government needs to offer incentives to business like a man needs to offer incentives to another man.

Both men are governments. The consumer is a government, the supply is a government. But how will both benefit? This is a scientific procedure that is not understood or misunderstoof by the majority.

Everything. Everyone, has a purpose.

Ayn Rand is one of the greatest minds the human race has ever produced.
I am not a "fifteen year old boy" as the member of the
hive culture of Japan derisibly states, I am fifty five years old and none of the various philosophies rang very
true until I read my first Rand book.
Rand is a threat, because practically every belief
system on earth has been created to con people into
sacrificing, usually for the benefit of the one espousing
the paticular belief system in question.
Want to live forever in heaven? Follow me, walk into a bar with 20 lbs of explosive, drink cyanide laced koolaid,
give me all of your money and time, and you will receive your reward(after you're dead, of course).
From each according to his abilities to each according
to his needs. Your ability servicing my "needs", of course.
At least communism is honest, under communism you
get little to nothing alive or dead, while the
rulers live in luxery.
But both statism and religion have one thing in common,
mainly that altruism is the highest ideal, self sacrifice.
Of course you are always the one doing the sacrificing
while I get the benefits.
Of course who would do that? So invent some "god", or
with statism, the future. Communism will create a bright
future someday, just not today(except for me, of course).
Hundreds of millions have died in various wars, inquistions,
crusades, persecutions, and so on.
And what have they gained?
It's like the old saying, what if they had a war and nobody came?
Where I live there azre churches on practically every block,
sometimes more.
At huge expense. What if instead everybody just quit throwing this massive amount of effort into a vain hope of
some "heaven" and spent all of this effort and treasure
improving their lives?
All of the preachers, politicians, dictators, Imans, etc
would have to get a real job, probably starve to death