|Users Online Now: 1,464 (Who's On?)||Visitors Today: 1,906,014|
|Pageviews Today: 2,069,813||Threads Today: 169||Posts Today: 3,064|
Obama's Next Move For a 2nd Term? Bye Bye Suburbs....
User ID: 1379749
08/15/2012 09:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
How Obama Is Robbing The Suburbs To Pay For The Cities
By Stanley Kurtz
Political experts left and right agree: the coming election will be decided by America’s suburbanites. From Florida to Virginia on across the country, in every battleground state, they are the key demographic. All of which raises a question that has not been considered as yet, and ought to be: is President Obama’s re-election in the suburbanites’ interest? The answer emphatically is no.
As many Americans do not know, in the eyes of the leftist community organizers who trained Obama, suburbs are instruments of bigotry and greed — a way of selfishly refusing to share tax money with the urban poor. Obama adopted this view early on, and he has never wavered from this ideological commitment, as a review of his actions in office goes to show.
President Obama’s plans for a second-term include an initiative to systematically redistribute the wealth of America’s suburbs to the cities. It’s a transformative idea, and deserves to be fully aired before the election. But like a lot of his major progressive policy innovations, Obama has advanced this one stealthily–mostly through rule-making, appointment, and vague directives. Obama has worked on this project in collaboration with Mike Kruglik, one of his original community organizing mentors. Kruglik’s new group, Building One America, advocates “regional tax-base sharing,” a practice by which suburban tax money is directly redistributed to nearby cities and less-well-off “inner-ring” suburbs. Kruglik’s group also favors a raft of policies designed to coerce people out of their cars and force suburbanites (with their tax money) back into densely packed cities.
[link to www.forbes.com]
Belief Does Not Equal Reality
Its not that conspiracy theorists are ignorant. It's that so much of what they know to be true is wrong.
Sometimes the truth sounds like an insult when you are not use to hearing it.
100 invalid arguments do not accumulate into 1 valid one.