Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,796 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,663,838
Pageviews Today: 2,737,816Threads Today: 908Posts Today: 19,920
10:44 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

George Washington Speaks! Don't follow the fearmongers! Reads like Pelosi with Obamacare! Pass the Constitution, then see what happens!

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14199828
United States
08/17/2012 05:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
George Washington Speaks! Don't follow the fearmongers! Reads like Pelosi with Obamacare! Pass the Constitution, then see what happens!
[link to gwpapers.virginia.edu]

That the Assembly would afford the people an opportunity of deciding on the proposed Constitution I had hardly a doubt; the only question with me was, whether it would go forth under favourable auspices, or be branded with the mark of disapprobation. The opponents, I expected, (for it has ever been, that the adversaries to a measure are more active than its friends) would endeavour to give it an unfavourable complexion, with a view to biass the public mind. This, evidently, is the case with the writers in opposition; for their objections are better calculated to alarm the fears, than to convince the judgment of their readers. They build them upon principles which do not exist in the Constitution--which the known & litteral sense of it, does not support them in; and this too, after being flatly told that they are treading on untenable ground and after an appeal has been made to the letter, & spirit thereof, for proof: and then, as if the doctrine was uncontrovertable, draw such consequences as are necessary to rouse the apprehensions of the ignorant, & unthinking. It is not the interest of the major part of these characters to be convinced; nor will their local views yield to arguments which do not accord with their present, or future prospects; and yet, a candid solution of a single question, to which the understanding of almost every man is competent, must decide the point in dispute--namely--is it best for the States to unite, or not to unite?

If there are men who prefer the latter, then, unquestionably, the Constitution which is offered, must, in their estimation, be inadmissible from the first Word to the last signature, inclusively. But those who may think differently, and yet object to parts of it, would do well to consider, that it does not lye with one State, nor with a minority of the States, to superstruct a Constitution for the whole. The seperate interests, as far as it is practicable, must be consolidated--and local views as far as the general good will admit, must be attended to. Hence it is that every state has some objection to the proposed form; and that these objections are directed to different points. That which is most pleasing to one, is obnoxious to another, and vice versa. If then the Union of the whole is a desirable object, the parts which compose it, must yield a little in order to accomplish it; for without the latter, the former is unattainable. For I again repeat it, that not a single state nor a minority of the States, can force a Constitution on the majority. But admitting they had (from their importance) the power to do it, will it not be granted that the attempt would be followed by civil commotions of a very serious nature? But to sum up the whole, let the opponants of the proposed Constitution, in this State, be asked--it is a question they ought certainly to have asked themselves; What line of conduct they would advise it to adopt, if nine other States should accede to it, of which I think there is little doubt? Would they recommend that it should stand on its own basis--seperate & distinct from the rest? Or would they connect it with Rhode Island, or even say two others, checkerwise, & remain with them as outcasts from the Society, to shift for themselves? or will they advise a return to our former dependence on Great Britain for their protection & support? or lastly would they prefer the mortification of comg in, when they will have no credit there from? I am sorry to add in this place that Virginians entertain too high an opinion of the importance of their own Country. In extent of territory--In number of Inhabitants (of all descriptions) & In wealth I will readily grant that it certainly stands first in the Union; but in point of strength, it is, comparitively, weak. To this point, my opportunities authorise me to speak, decidedly; and sure I am, in every point of view, in which the subject can be placed, it is not (considering also the Geographical situation of the State) more the interest of any one of them to confederate, than it is the one in which we live.

The warmest friends to and the best supporters of the Constitution, do not contend that it is free from imperfections; but these were not to be avoided, and they are convinced if evils are likely to flow from them, that the remedy must come thereafter; because, in the present moment it is not to be obtained. And as there is a Constitutional door open for it, I think the people (for it is with them to judge) can, as they will have the aid of experience on their side, decide with as much propriety on the alterations and amendments wch shall be found necessary, as ourselves; for I do not conceive that we are more inspired--have more wisdem--or possess more virtue than those who will come after us.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 14199828
United States
08/17/2012 06:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: George Washington Speaks! Don't follow the fearmongers! Reads like Pelosi with Obamacare! Pass the Constitution, then see what happens!
bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 14199828
United States
08/17/2012 06:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: George Washington Speaks! Don't follow the fearmongers! Reads like Pelosi with Obamacare! Pass the Constitution, then see what happens!
If GLP were around at the time of the Constitution, how many of you would have said:

Washington is the puppet of the new world order
Why do you believe in US vs UK? It's the same people
Lexington was a false flag
This Constitution is big government trying to take over state's rights...

News