WORLD TV PREMIER - 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out Watch Live 8/18 Sat. at 7pm MST

DDan2 schau auf dem bild...so stürzt ein solches gebäude in 1,5sek ein
erklär das diesen möchtegerns hier mal ich dreh langsam durch ;)

[link to www.nexus-magazin.de]

Explain this then nuketard

[link to images.nycsubway.org]

IMHO the beams are not turning to dust ... they are falling "straight" down (just like the buldings did)!!! The dust is simply from all the dust that the demolition caused (again IMHO).

They are at least 6 stories tall which means if they fell OVER they would have hit something?? If anyone would like to tet it, stand a beam up (on end) and light a bunch of office furniture at the bottom of it...you can even put jet fuel on it (as much as you would like) and I will bet $1,000,000 that the beam will NOT collapse into itself but simply fall over!!!

All IMHO...

what is this?

If that kind of destruction came from below, then please explain how the basin of the building was still more or less intact, and not turned to glass.

[link to drjudywood.com]

(see figures 15+16 on that page)

I personally do not believe in the Nuke theory as there would have been more destruction under the buildings than there actually was. Also the building would have only fallen150 meters down before it would have stopped.

I do believe that they were brought down, but NOT by planes!!! These were demolitioned. How or with what I have no idea...but they were brought down BY MAN !!!

But then we would see dust falling, and the steel beams (that had that dust on their surface) falling faster away "under" the dust, wouldn't we? But what's in the video is just one beam falling, and then while falling and keeping the same falling speed, disintegrating into dust...

here about minute 1:45 you see the damage zone. and the the bathtub is not in the damage zone mkay

This video says it all

You can see the skeleton start to fall (straight down) and what remains is the dust that was on it.

That is just what I see...but either way "THIS WAS NOT A NATURAL THING THAT HAPPENED"! That I agree 100% with you on...

I will say that the 57 second beams look really freaky because they start to fall and then it looks as if they turned to dust. The other ones in the clip doesn't look as freaky as that one...

and you believe the wtc was destroiet by The Star Wars Beam Weapons??

I dunno... if there were nukes, that place would be a deadly radioactive nightmare still I suppose. But assuming for a moment there were indeed nukes, how do you drill two 100m deep holes into the basements of those buildings, for placing the bombs there? How long would that have taken, and wouldn't that have made an awful lot of noise?

I don't believe anything. The evidence speaks for itself.

which are bombs were placed in the construction of the WTC on, all building to be blown up in new york have in certain situations can (otherwise, you are the building does not build) with kontroliertem blow with tnt or thermite, but because that was not in this building possible you had to come up with another solution, the underground nuclear-explosion that you see everything in the video, the third truth

in this video in minute 0:19 you see the cakera shaking also then explode the nuke and then goes 7 sec and the tower goes to dust. and you listen not the explosion because it is not in the underground sound waves

Only the upper part of the towers was not dust, and fell down because everything was dust on all steel concrete human ...

here a video how underground nukes works

so anyone wanna more explains?
I do not think this says something about expert underground nukes that will lie to you with this shit nano thermite ..

thank you Patrick..very good video thats explain the underground nuclear bomb, are you with me?

My belief is that it was Nano-Thermite painted on the columns from Aug 2001 to just after Labor day. Each night between 2AM and 5AM after the cleaning crews left and before the first traders showed up a series of unmarked white vans appeared. The men dressed in overalls carried 5Gal pails into the buildings. The security camera footage exists and will not be shown.

Last Edited by PatrikC325 on 08/18/2012 11:19 AM

Late on the night of August 23, 2001, at about 3 a.m. security cameras in the parking garage of the World Trade Center captured the arrival of two or three truck vans. Visual examination determined the vans were separate and unique from trucks used by janitorial services, including different colors and devoid of markings. More curious, all the janitorial trucks had pulled out of the Towers by about 2:30 a.m—about half an hour before the second set of vans arrived. According to my high level State Department source with a top security clearance, who disclosed the unusual nightly activity, no vans matching that description had entered the World Trade Center at such an hour in any of the weeks or months prior to that date. It was a unique event.

[link to wearechange.org]

This is disinfo people.

The US Gov doesn not have complete control over the internet like they have over the television.

They cant edit out 9/11 from history... but they CAN come in and present dozens of rediculous different scenarios in an attepmt to make '9/11 truthers' look retarded.

Pleas e stop man. There was no nuclear weapons used in 9/11. you are only making the truth harder to discover.

I cant tell you what exactly happened to towers 1 and 2 yet, but it can say WITHOUT A DOUBT, that building 7 (the building thatwas not hit by an airplane) was a controlled demolition.

Youtube building 7 and then youtube video of controlled demolitions around the world, and you will see that there is NO WAY that something else brought down building 7 in that same manner other than controlled demolition.

Last Edited by chris999 on 08/18/2012 11:25 AM

Lol, a truthtard arguing with a nuketard who is arguing with a spacelasertard, all you guys need now is a no-planer.

this is exactly right.

This video linked has tons of great SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEWED AND UNCHALLENGED INFORMATION. Why the fuck is everyone off topic and talking about made up disinfo bullshit when there is UNCHALLENGED PEER REVIEWED PAPERS out there.

stay on topic and talk about scientific facts.

Last Edited by Blue Beamed on 08/18/2012 11:35 AM

Do you even know what peer review is?

I pinned this again for discussion.

Don't talk down to me shill. Of course I know what a peer review is.

shill