WORLD TV PREMIER - 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out Watch Live 8/18 Sat. at 7pm MST

[link to dl.dropbox.com]

(Warning: its a PDF file.)



Conclusions

The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are consistent with a carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments.

There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore the red layer of the red/gray chips is not thermite or nano-thermite.

"If you are a college student, like myself, AE 9/11 helps to organize for enterprising persons such as yourself..."

I am a volunteer for the AE911Truth College Outreach Team. Email me [email protected] and I can help you outreach on campus. Are you interested in forming a student club?

Explain the steel beam turning to dust.

why you talk about nano thermite and explosive evidence? this is just another lie,to cover for the real truth

the wtc and building 7 were demolished by underground nuclear bombs

[link to www.checktheevidence.com]

this is why the steel going to dust

Just this slideshow alone should convince anyone with half a brain that this is terribly wrong
[link to www2.ae911truth.org]

therefore were still months after 9/11 still measured extreme temperatures of over 1000 degrees and it was all contaminated you know it too. came not from the fire alarms as they said. its a nuclear bomb underground

Ok here is my theory on this. Bin Laden was a rich tycoon dealing with Bush Senior. ( known fact) the US Government trained and supplied bin Ladens men with weapons and Army training ( known fact) If the theory of the illuminati is correct and they needed a reason to go to war with the world and be able to place troops in any country that they like for example Afganistan Iraq Kuwait Pakistan Iran and even our little old Australia what better enemy to have than terrorism. The enemy that can and does happen all over the world. So what they need is a home land incident , because as we know, and I mean no offence by this, they only really care about what goes on in America. So if you are going to commit an attrosity it needs to be big if you want the desired effect. What bigger symbol than the World Trade Centre. So now you need someone you can blame, someone who is known, someone who is believable, someone who is a minority, someone you can control. Ok so where do we find a Musslim terror organization that hates Christians, hates woman, hates the western world and can be controlled?????? Hello Osama .....
My theory is that Bin was in with the whole deal. I mean the only time we heard from him was via video from some cave( think moon landing conspiracy here) . We never saw a body because of there fear of retaliation. They killed the so called leader of the Talliban. If that doesn't preview retaliation I don't know what would. If the President of the United States was killed that America would retaliate with everything they had, yet since Bin Ladens death we haven't had a peep from the Taliban. No body no video no proof. But with Saddam, well captured tried and executed........ Discuss

It didnt, and only the dumbest of Woodtards think it did, even the truthtards debunked her.

i think osama is obama they have the exact same facial features

is this the movie??? - [link to topdocumentaryfilms.com]

My favorite theory is that "someone" got wind of uncle Osama planning to hijack planes, and then that "someone" made sure it really worked: stand down orders for the military, control of the media, nano-thermite, directed energy weapons, the works.

"What, Osama, you wanna fly planes into the WTCs? That coincides nicely with our plans on the global chess board, so just you wait, we make sure it goes well, and as a bonus you'll get more than you bargained for!"

Some black forces piggybacked on his plans. Plausible deniability.

bombs in the buildings

nucular bombs under the buildings!!! goddammite

inside job

geiger counter was banned at ground zero...
hmmm why?? think about

and you know the real meaning of "ground zero"

ground zero = is a place where a nuclear explosion took place sien

(sorry for bad english)

AE911 represents 1/10 of 1% of active US Architects and Engineers.

That's 1 in 10,0000.

They are the fringe of the fringe of the fringe.

There is NO actual evidence that the WTCs were brought down by controlled demo. I'd like there to be, as I fucking hate the neocons and George Jr., but there's not.

Definition of GROUND ZERO

1
: the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs
2
: the center or origin of rapid, intense, or violent activity or change; broadly : center 2a <the party town that served as ground zero for those corporate … bashes — Rich Eisen>
3
: the very beginning : square one
See ground zero defined for English-language learners »
See ground zero defined for kids »

i found now this site.


[link to www.nucleardemolition.com]

ALL HAIL William Rodriguez
LONG LIVE William Rodriguez

The concept had to change after 9/11
look in an older lexicon before 2001. there is always hang together in a nuclear explosion

Geiger counters are not banned, a rule was suggested in 2008 to prevent doomtards freaking out at the slightest change. Mr Khazelov has had plenty of time to go there with one but never bothered, says it all really.

How about steel beams turning to dust in front of your eyes.

Be fore you crawl back in your hole I need to let you know what this 1% is capable of:

AE911 NEVER swayed about what was true and when they had a chance to prove it (meaning NIST had to listen) they were able to get NIST to admit that there was 1.5 seconds of "FREE FALL" with WTC7. Do you have any idea what this means?

...<pause>...

It means that for 1.5 seconds (according to NIST) WTC7 fell as if NOTHING was below it (meaning NO STEEL Reenforced BEAMS). Exactly how can this be accomplished with a 47 story building and remember that the middle floors were all re-enforced because it was the Mayor's war room (and air tight).

...<pause>...

Now, the ONLY way you can get 1.5 seconds of free fall achieved is (normally) through demolition...there is no other "known" way that this can happen without the use of "something" to excellerate the collapse and achieve FREE FALL (IMHO).

by making a 100 meter large hole under the building with a small nuclear-explosion

[link to www.nexus-magazin.de]

DDan2 schau auf dem bild...so stürzt ein solches gebäude in 1,5sek ein
erklär das diesen möchtegerns hier mal ich dreh langsam durch ;)

[link to www.nexus-magazin.de]