Why Assange denies any 911 truth?

It's no wonder the bankers shaft us with impunity with obsessive twats such as this fellow.

It's my opinion that he plays down the whole 9/11 conspiracy for the following reasons;

His current supporters are both 911 truthers and many others who swallow the official story. By admitting 9/11 was a coverup would alienate a large proportion of his supporters, including lawyers and others who are directly helping his defence.

Makes sense to me

So he is deliberately concealing?

I don't buy it. I like your angle - it is the *perfect* excuse - but if he is all about the truth - NO CONCEALMENT!

Cheers!

No, like the vast bulk of rational progressives, he realises that it makes no sense for the fabulously wealthy to kill the goose that is laying the golden egg. There are other plausible scenarios that would explain this pointless act, that it would be inspired by rationalists...no.

Oh I have read all the information on 911. Some numbskull surely carried out the act. It's had no real effect on the effect of capitalism on our lives however. In fact, in the interim, we have experienced the highs of a boom and now the convulsions of capital's hubris. But this act has been an utter waste of time.

I know a girl with natural white hair and red dye that's growing out. Green eyes too.

OP = Shill

how am I a shill?

Have you read my posts? lol

If I'm a shill - I'm a very naughty one :P

Get that brain out and use it, for crikeys sakes!!!

Agreed.

Good point. Easy litmus test to determine who's a limited hangout and who's a real dissenter: do they support the official government explanation for the events surrounding 9/11/01?

In fact, that's all one needs to know.

Why haven't they gone after Snowden yet then, if no one is safe? Possibly because he is also in on it?

Anyone getting millions of viewers attentions, national spotlight, the ability to "speak their mind" is controlled opposition. There is a great 7-8 minute video on controlled opposition, I'd be happy to look around and find it if you want, but I won't presume to know what you already know or don't know. :)

Anyone who claims to have secret inside info and gets lots of MSM coverage such as Assange and Snowden is bogus. If they had real info other than petty stuff or stuff we already know such as Snowden and his rehashed Echelon crap they would be hunted down or marginalized. They are there to push an agenda and not to be the selfless warrior for truth they claim to be

Let us look @ 9-11 in terms of the facts we know right now as to Iraq ....right now. Everything was a lie. Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction. We actually had U.N. inspectors telling the same. The yellow cake claims were a complete fabrication. The Iraqis that were trotted out for the Iraq war were liars. The cultural,tribal,religious,political facts on the ground were totally ignored. The story that the locals would love us....yes, a lie . Well, things didn't go that well ....but "we will train the Iraq military spend trillions, set up a total control all seeing eye,like we have in U.S. Anybody acts up you arrest them,take away their guns,it will be fine,just wait." Sadam had zero to do with 9-11 and did not support terrorists.

Post 9-11.. U.S. No borders. Most of constitution an illusion and disregarded. All things monitored by Big Brother....N.S.A.
All those crazy conspiracy tards were .... RIGHT.

I believe 9-11 is a "don't go there" type of deal. If you actually had the smoking gun and sunshined it you would be dead meat.

Conclusion : 9-11 is too hot to handle and too cold to hold.

assange was always a shill, the only people vouching for him are anti-intel agents

:history: