Chemtrails Through The Eyes Of A Television Weatherman. INCREDIBLE!!

And there ya go, Guy. You're not paying attention to the sky,or, your just here to debunk with some good old cut and paste. Doing a lousy job.

The long persistent trails in the sky are Chemical trails used to manipulate our weather.

Really?

:trail::distrail1::guycons1::guycons2::guycons4::consback::gu​ycons5::screwtrail::consshad::22degree::circumzen::weirdclo::​guycons6::guycons7::conshad2::guycons11::guycons12::guycons13​::virgapunch::concurve::conblock::conshad4::conseg::consgr::c​onsisr:

Those are all pictures I took myself. I've been an avid sky-watcher all my life, which is how I know that what you call "chemtrails" have been around far longer than the late 90s. Now, prove you know what you're talking about. How do natural clouds form?

oh fuck.. now the horny sailor's favorite is on the job.

let noble suck you off. that's his job.

I'll do you a massive favor navy boy!
Ill respond cause I'm bored.

The facts have been showed to you many times..(ya retard)
the situation in reality (what is being done) is wrong so the mainstream media answers you need will never happen.
What you know of science is surface earth sheeple science .
Its backward and a thousand years behind of whats real.
Chemtrails have at least 5 different purposes, none of which are for the benefit of Humankind. (so you'll be right then)

You get upset that no one answers your questions over the last few years LOL , well because your a dumb cunt..

same old same old questions that were answered before ..
So everyone knows your energy draining vampiraparasitic diversional shill tactician,,, and most couldnt be fucked to repeat the answers to your boring child like repetitive questions. and ya not worth it.

Your a dope.

If you are really sincerely dumb, and dont know by now, YOU NEVER WILL.
But I recon your scum and know exactly what your doing. the way you shills time in and tag team is a fukin eye opener.


Oh,, and as for nobel your just slime get fucked!

And you chemtards complain about insults? Seriously??

that's no insult. the guy IS the horny sailor's favorite!!

and noble??? well you already know all about him. he's EVERYBODY'S favorite.

And just to be clear, I mean facts, not rhetoric. Rhetoric is somebody saying something like, "I know what I see, this isn't normal, normal contrails don't do that," etc., without anything to back it up. Facts cite actual studies and verifiable numbers and experiments.

Thank you OP for a very good thread. For posting the documentary and links about the Chem Trail phenomenon.

It answered a lot of questions and gave much insight into what is going on in the sky above.

Much appreciated.

If normal contrails can't form clouds, then how do you think natural clouds form?

I've tried that. Chemtrail believers say that what I reference is invalid because I agree with the "official" explanation, and that I must be either A) Painfully ignorant, or B) In on it. The closest I've seen to actual numbers is analysis of material collected over several days in a HEPA filter (with no attempt to find the actual source of the windblown material), and soil samples (with no baseline control sample). You and others like you are the ones making the claim. If normal contrails can't form clouds, then how do you think natural clouds form?

Hello Guy! you back in port . . .?? I haven't seen much of you lately . . .

Why don't you just show "The Guy" what you've got? Should be easy. What are you afraid of?

that's no insult. the guy IS the horny sailor's favorite!!

and noble??? well you already know all about him. he's EVERYBODY'S favorite.

Exactly how does a chemical manipulate the weather?

Uh....Oh, He's baaaaach...........Hi George. Cool to have you back.

Regarding "baseline" in soil samples, California farmers had that wsell documented. They do this so as to determine which soil amenities and supplements they need for whatever crops are planned. They had that and they later had the differences according to UC Davis which you cannot have bettered.

Through HAARP...haven't you been paying attention to the chemtard speculation?!?

No, your mom is everyone's favorite...

the point too argue is as pointless as the point known,,

from both points of view,,

as all is equal when perverted by a un-known agender of falsehood,,


lest it be known,,


too find a truth in a lie dominated society,, or to bare that truth,, the answer lies in the end result reversed,,

imaj-ine the truth already exposed in its entirety in the future,,

how was it proven? how was the wall of cards collapesd?,,


imaj-ine the detail of how it was prooven in the past tense,,

as a known truth,, then detail this find in your own individual endeavours accordingly,,

as the lie of any truth,, is already exposed by way of a deliberate denial association,,

to win in a rigged game owned by the people perpertuating the lie,,

is as riduculous as the attempt to do so,,

so that is a witnesses is necessary,,



as it will all change,,



remeber you were dead before you were alive,,


fear is ego,, ego is the reason for your suffering manipulated reality,,





much love,,

So you imagine that all of the scientific knowledge about cloud formation is inaccurate or a "falsehood"? After all, the absolute foundation of "chemtrail" beliefs is that there is no such thing as persistent contrails. THAT notion is the falsehood being perpetrated on the public.

Hi . . . how are things . . . ?

There are those of us who don't think visible persistence is a perquisite for an Intentional Covert Atmospheric Aerosol Injection Program (ICAAIP) to exist . . .

I realize that. However, that doesn't change what I said. 99% of chemtrail believers think that persistence is THE proof that a line in the sky is a 'chemtrail'.

This ^

None of you chemtrail believers will answer this simple question? Why?