Chemtrails Through The Eyes Of A Television Weatherman. INCREDIBLE!!

You complained that nothing but your statement about how quickly contrails dissipate is ever noted from your other thread. I noted something else, but YOU ignore it. Why is that? Here it is again.

What about this: Clearly shown at 1:50 of that vid, claiming to show "chemtrails" being "sprayed" from an EasyJet airliner, it shows a contrail materializing well behind the engines- not being "sprayed" from the engines. Why the gap?

You people are perpetrating a HOAX! When pinned down on the claims which form the basis of your HOAX, you refuse to respond and derail the discussion with insults. It's SOOO obvious!

From rough estimation from observation over the last twenty or so years 90% of the chemtrails produce cloud banks like this.

Thread: What kind of clouds are these?

Thread: What kind of clouds are these?

Is that what you believe- that planes cause all clouds? Interesting. I certainly said no such thing.

Is that even an asnswer to "The Guy's" question? No, it's not. Care to try again? Read carefully:

If normal contrails can't form clouds, then how do you think natural clouds form?

A question is on the table. Care to take a stab at it?

If normal contrails can't form clouds, then how do you think natural clouds form?

That question has been answered for you several times now on this thread.

If you're missing it, then, oh.....well.

Then you should have no trouble quoting it, right? Unless you're lying, of course. We are about to see which it is.

That is nice nice of you #447. That's what we've been trying to explain to "Menow".

She's sure to appreciate it. Thank you.

No lies, just fact. See poster #447 even posted for you. Check it out.

[link to ferenc.biz]
[link to ferenc.biz]

smoke
[link to 3.bp.blogspot.com]

smoke..not fluffy h2o ice crystals
[link to cdn.greenprophet.com]

^chemtrails primarily will create this spectral situation

Thank you #447. I hadn't seen these myself. Appreciate you taking the time to help us out here.

Not just the "spectral" comparison but also the particulates behavior is beyond extremely similar.

Yeah... sorry, but posting links to two entire threads is not an answer to the question. If the answer is in those threads, why can't you just repeat it? I know why- it's because you really can't answer the question in a concise manner. You have to depend on a blunt morass of vague and misleading nonsense to confuse the public and keep your hoax alive.

In the "same sky"? The "sky" extends around the entire planet from, say, 100 feet overhead clear up to outer space. You are attempting to foist the lie upon the public that the "sky" contains the same atmospheric conditions everywhere all the time. It's not true. You are a hoaxer.

menow is just a shill who gets called out to troll when the little troll shills are failing.

pretty simple, menow. easy as 1-2-3 and shawnee has the meat..in this case.

"Spectral"?? You mean as in like a rainbow is "spectral"? Gee... what do rainbows consist of? Hmm...

That is your comeback? how gay.




wimp

And you know this...how? Oh, because you've done controlled experiments in the lab and the field! I'm an idiot! I mistaken your "I", intelligence, thing as if you were only guessing, but thought of yourself as enlightened. My bad.

Continue on Miss PhD.

You don't see the utter contradiction between what is said in this vid about the "gap" between engine and contrail and what was said in the other vid I have been asking you about??

Here are some smoke "spectral qualities" for the gay response of the menow troll

[link to www.onthewingphotography.com]

Cute.

"This video has been removed by the user".

Yeah, that's kinda what I figure. Night shift on o/t right now.

She might as well put it into bold print all over the place.

lol

What is that supposed to show? Please be specific. I have seen WAAAY redder skies created by forest fires. Are you claiming that one was created by "chemtrails"? Really?

again you clumsily dodge the point.

keep dodging