EARTHQUAKE WATCH for August 25-26 due to asteroids | |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 1307920 United States 08/21/2012 09:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Recent watches due to asteroid/earthquake connection: Posted 08/10 Thread: Earthquake watch begins after August 4th -- but will a megaquake hit? Target 08/18 Result 08/18 Magnitude 6.3 INDONESIA Posted 08/02 Thread: Earthquake watch begins after August 4th -- but will a megaquake hit? Target 08/06 +- 1 day Target 08/08 +- 1 day Result 08/06 Magnitude 4.5 Coalinga, CA Result 08/08 Magnitude 4.5 Yorba Linda, CA (x2) Posted 07/19 Thread: EARTHQUAKE WATCH for July 20-22 Target 07/21 + 1 day Result 07/21 Magnitude 5.2 OFFSHORE N CALIFORNIA Result 07/21 Magnitude 5.1 OFFSHORE N CALIFORNIA Posted 07/11 Thread: EARTHQUAKE WATCH for within 48 hours through July 13! Target 07/12 + 1 day Result 07/12 Magnitude 6.2 Hindu Kush region [link to tribune.com.pk] Posted 07/02 Thread: EARTHQUAKE WATCH for within a day of July 5, 2012 Target 07/05 +- 1 days Result 07/06 Magnitude 6.3 Posted 06/29 Thread: Earthquake prediction - To hit within 36 hours of June 29 Target 06/29 + 1 day Result 06/29 Magnitude 6.3 ----- Significant and newsworthy quake references: [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] [link to neic.usgs.gov] |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 1307920 United States 08/21/2012 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Future watch dates with high NEO counts: 09/02/12 09/14/12 10/17/12 10/28/12 |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 08/27/2012 02:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1043775 United States 08/27/2012 02:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 08/27/2012 02:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 08/27/2012 02:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 08/27/2012 02:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Sungaze_At_Dawn User ID: 1458670 Canada 08/27/2012 02:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22223582 Australia 08/27/2012 02:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 08/27/2012 03:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 08/27/2012 03:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Result -- USGS Significant Earthquakes past 30 days 7.3 Puerto El Triunfo, El Salvador 2012-08-27 04:37:20 5.5 Brawley, California 2012-08-26 20:57:58 5.3 Brawley, California 2012-08-26 19:31:22 6.6 Tobelo, Indonesia 2012-08-26 15:05:37 6.3 Palu, Indonesia 2012-08-18 09:41:52 7.7 Poronaysk, Russia 2012-08-14 02:59:42 6.2 Ahar, Iran 2012-08-11 12:34:35 6.4 Ahar, Iran 2012-08-11 12:23:18 4.5 Yorba Linda, California 2012-08-08 16:33:22 4.5 Yorba Linda, California 2012-08-08 06:23:34 4.5 Coalinga, California 2012-08-06 07:35:49 6.5 Taron, PNG 2012-07-28 20:03:56 [link to earthquake.usgs.gov] |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 08/27/2012 09:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Earthquake storm" continues to rattle Imperial County, surrounding areas [link to latimesblogs.latimes.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22702986 Peru 08/27/2012 01:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 1307920 United States 08/27/2012 06:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 08/27/2012 10:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So I started this thread on August 21st. I used to wait and just before the event because otherwise the thread is seen as "old" when event happens. So here I get a nice set of quakes during my watch window. And no one notices. Or at least comments. Because the thread is "old"? Should I wait until Sept 1, to post my Sept 2 watch? If I post it now it just attracts 1 star bandits. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21226563 United States 08/27/2012 11:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You should wait until you can predict a significant quake, you know, one of those in a blue moon types instead of 6's. Stop with the need for recognition, wow us! show us your theory works, predict a quake that makes us step back and think hmmm. Myself I am far, far from impressed with any predictions under 8. 1 star. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1331430 United States 08/27/2012 11:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You should wait until you can predict a significant quake, you know, one of those in a blue moon types instead of 6's. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21226563 Stop with the need for recognition, wow us! show us your theory works, predict a quake that makes us step back and think hmmm. Myself I am far, far from impressed with any predictions under 8. 1 star. Lay off. At least the OP, The Truth Worker, shares the theories and data behind his predictions. Unlike many who post warnings on this site. Plus his predictions often pan out. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22156307 United States 08/27/2012 11:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Damnit.. i hate when big quakes happen coincidentally when someone predicts something like this.. They think they are right and find the new date to create a prediction.. So dumb.. no asteroid can do this.. if and asteroid could do this.. then we would be dead right now.. due to all the fuckin asteroids in our solar system. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22734305 United States 08/27/2012 11:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You should wait until you can predict a significant quake, you know, one of those in a blue moon types instead of 6's. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21226563 Stop with the need for recognition, wow us! show us your theory works, predict a quake that makes us step back and think hmmm. Myself I am far, far from impressed with any predictions under 8. 1 star. Lay off. At least the OP, The Truth Worker, shares the theories and data behind his predictions. Unlike many who post warnings on this site. Plus his predictions often pan out. Oh hush your noise, lol, telling me to lay off. TW asked a question, I answered with my opinion. I'm also guessing through lack of response, no one is interested in pitiful predictions, not even the regular quaketards are jumping in to pat them on the back. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16847391 United States 08/27/2012 11:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 08/27/2012 11:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You should wait until you can predict a significant quake, you know, one of those in a blue moon types instead of 6's. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21226563 Stop with the need for recognition, wow us! show us your theory works, predict a quake that makes us step back and think hmmm. Myself I am far, far from impressed with any predictions under 8. 1 star. I can not predict an 8.0+ right now because none are indicated by any of my current research. Make sense? I am showing how asteroids influence earthquakes... something no one has pointed out before. For some reason this is important. Not sure why now. I suppose theories like this start small and insignificant but need to be tested and proven. I began do that on my own with no audience in 2011. In March 2012 I posted my predictions here. My predictions first got a lot of attention and kudos. It was fun. And they were so usually accurate that Sergman' with his failed prediction thread had to change his rules for tracking earthquake predictions because no else ever had multiple hits on his list -- and that just can't be. So predicting the future and proving a theory is fun and challenging. My theory does work. It predicts earthquakes. Sorry if there are no megaquakes indicated at this time. We certainly could have one anytime. Wouldn't it be nice if I had a reason to share my approach, refine it and have in working, active and operational AT THE TIME a megaquake does approach. Yet it seems you says turn off the radar because nothing big can be seem YET. Last Edited by TheTruthWorker on 08/28/2012 12:05 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22734305 United States 08/27/2012 11:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sergman disagreed with you, I remember him saying that with the chances of a 6 happening you would probably get a few right. Which is true when you keep the mag so low, and you have been told this no end, yet you still take it as you were right, and you even give yourself a three day window for your predictions, hell, you are bound to get a couple right. He changed the rules because you were on his thread arguing until you were blue in the face. I read it all, it is one of my fave threads. Your theory does not work, you cannot say it does with such little research, 2011 did you say? Don't expect a big response until you predict an 8+, that would be a whole different ballgame. |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 08/27/2012 11:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Damnit.. i hate when big quakes happen coincidentally when someone predicts something like this.. They think they are right and find the new date to create a prediction.. So dumb.. no asteroid can do this.. if and asteroid could do this.. then we would be dead right now.. due to all the fuckin asteroids in our solar system. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22156307 I purposely posted all my recent predictions so you can see it is not just pulling dates out of the air. I also post my charts and data... and data sources. WHEN there are a lot of asteroids listed on NASA's CLose Approach table flying close by Earth on the same day THEN we tend to have more earthquakes. A lot means high above average. The higher the number, the more often we see significant quakes. The stats on this are solid, in the can. The connection is right there in the historic data. And the connections are evident and spelled out in my links and results of my forecasting. |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 08/27/2012 11:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Zazz -- what the hell are you taking about? Not only is it a HIT but multiple hit. |
dettro99 User ID: 15052548 United States 08/27/2012 11:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20892380 United States 08/27/2012 11:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22737397 United States 08/27/2012 11:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Due to the above average number of near earth objects making close approaches to Earth I am looking for a significant or newsworthy earthquake on August 25 or 26 + 1 day. Chart below show watch periods due to high NEO count and results. Targets chosen based on daily count and daily averages. Thread: AMAZING new discovery... earthquakes influenced by asteroids! Quoting: TheTruthWorker :Aug23: Spot on yet again!!!!!!! Good job!!!!!!! |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 08/28/2012 12:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You should wait until you can predict a significant quake, you know, one of those in a blue moon types instead of 6's. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21226563 Stop with the need for recognition, wow us! show us your theory works, predict a quake that makes us step back and think hmmm. Myself I am far, far from impressed with any predictions under 8. 1 star. Lay off. At least the OP, The Truth Worker, shares the theories and data behind his predictions. Unlike many who post warnings on this site. Plus his predictions often pan out. Oh hush your noise, lol, telling me to lay off. TW asked a question, I answered with my opinion. I'm also guessing through lack of response, no one is interested in pitiful predictions, not even the regular quaketards are jumping in to pat them on the back. Check out my reply to you. Thanks for your input. Just don't agree that this is not important. Guess I was ranting. I posted a successful prediction one day prior and get heat for only one day notice. I post a successful prediction one week prior and get lost, even after it hits. I used to post a new thread pointing out the hit of my prior prediction which seemed to attract those interested but I felt like I was bragging. There are two quaketard posters here on GLP that only focus on tooting their prediction horns (precicting a moderate quake during 1 or 3 week windows) and seem not to care about the group here. I admit I am seeking attention and recognition. Aren't we all? WHo shares info here on the board and hopes n one reads or responds. |
dettro99 User ID: 15052548 United States 08/28/2012 12:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthWorker (OP) User ID: 14354297 United States 08/28/2012 12:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sergman disagreed with you, I remember him saying that with the chances of a 6 happening you would probably get a few right. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22734305 Which is true when you keep the mag so low, and you have been told this no end, yet you still take it as you were right, and you even give yourself a three day window for your predictions, hell, you are bound to get a couple right. He changed the rules because you were on his thread arguing until you were blue in the face. I read it all, it is one of my fave threads. Your theory does not work, you cannot say it does with such little research, 2011 did you say? Don't expect a big response until you predict an 8+, that would be a whole different ballgame. His stats for probability of a prediction during a window were sorely flawed yet I respect his change in tracking quakes as listing all my hits is not the purpose of his thread. The purpose is to show FAILED predictions and most are my hits are not significant enough clog up his thread. I admit predicting a 6.3 quake is not a major thing (unless it occurred where you live) but they do not happen every day. And I have made a few targets lately for 48 or 36 hours instead of the 3 day window as the data determines, but just not all there yet as we are dealing with natural forces. |