|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Don't make ASSUMPTIONS; try to Understand.
|
|
Poster Handle
|
siniXster |
|
Post Content
|
...
Sure, there is a probable link, we just need to prove it. But on another line of thought perhaps synthia and the problems it creates or could create are better than not using something like synthia to mop up the oil and hydrocarbons released in the gulf. As my thinking is that the problem and blow out were intentional for releasing the building pressure and as a preventative measure, to what could have been a major catastrophe. Just a possible explanation. So it has taken two plus years for the pressure to rebuild and we are seeing the result of this in the form of leaks and fracturing of the ocean floor in the gulf and methane being released through the earths crust in a various of locations on dry land. sk
Quoting: seeker2 well, the oil industry has a few oil eating microbes in its bag of tricks; but back during the BP disaster one of these was NOT synthia (in 2010 synthia was still just an interesting oddity in the laboratory test tube). other than that, sk, you sound like you have a good beginning understanding of the big picture of what is happening. Do you have documentation to show your claim concerning Synthia AC? We, myself and others, know this is not the case so if you can prove your statement please, by all means, do. Hmmm, Sin is attacking shill comments on a touchy subject. maybe sin is for real then. I'm as real as they come AC, I put my life in harms way, as do others I know, to dig for the truth and bring it to light, no matter what teh cost. We invest a lot of time and our well being and ask nothing in return other than willing ears that want to listen, learn and survive. 
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
