That should read 'lost' Moon footage.
But you asked for facts and evidence and he gave them.
Quoting: US Coward 12267505 No.
He presented stuff he was made to
believe constitutes evidence.
Big difference.
notice how that fool Halcyon days picked on my spelling?
Quoting: Aussie Coward 3413581 NOT spelling.
You used the wrong WORD.
Using LEM is a dead give-away you never ever read any Apollo material.
clavius
clavius is a govt. site.
you expect any one who can think for themselves actually beileve anything from clavius?
Quoting: Aussie Coward 3413581 Poisoning the well is fallacious rhetoric.
PROOF them wrong.
Disproof their facts, their demonstrations, their logic, their professional expertise.
Just one item. I challenge you.
All you ever do is make accusation you fail miserable at supporting with evidence.
Don't you realise that such antics makes you look like a irrelevant loser.
[
link to www.france24.com]
Scroll down a bit and there is a pic of what he wore to the moon, look close at the boots, notice the heel is a bit thicker especially
Quoting: amywood71605 That's a museum display, how do you know those boots are identical to the ones that are on the Moon?
Here's a better pic of that display: [
link to upload.wikimedia.org]
Obviously not EVA boots. The real one's look more like this: [
link to www.hq.nasa.gov]
Now here:
[
link to supralimen.wordpress.com]
his footprint, its totally flat/all the same, I would think the heel being a bit thicker would NOT leave a print so even, no?
Quoting: amywood71605 That's not even Armstrong's print. Why don't you guys ever double-check your 'facts'.
That's Aldrin's print, he made it very deliberately and carefully for the express purpose of it being photographed.