Neil Armstrong has died at the age of 82 | |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 19507663 Netherlands 08/25/2012 09:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No. He presented stuff he was made to believe constitutes evidence. Big difference. NOT spelling. You used the wrong WORD. Using LEM is a dead give-away you never ever read any Apollo material. clavius Quoting: Aussie Coward 3413581 clavius is a govt. site. you expect any one who can think for themselves actually beileve anything from clavius? Poisoning the well is fallacious rhetoric. PROOF them wrong. Disproof their facts, their demonstrations, their logic, their professional expertise. Just one item. I challenge you. All you ever do is make accusation you fail miserable at supporting with evidence. Don't you realise that such antics makes you look like a irrelevant loser. [link to www.france24.com] Quoting: amywood71605 Scroll down a bit and there is a pic of what he wore to the moon, look close at the boots, notice the heel is a bit thicker especially That's a museum display, how do you know those boots are identical to the ones that are on the Moon? Here's a better pic of that display: [link to upload.wikimedia.org] Obviously not EVA boots. The real one's look more like this: [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] Now here: Quoting: amywood71605 [link to supralimen.wordpress.com] his footprint, its totally flat/all the same, I would think the heel being a bit thicker would NOT leave a print so even, no? That's not even Armstrong's print. Why don't you guys ever double-check your 'facts'. That's Aldrin's print, he made it very deliberately and carefully for the express purpose of it being photographed. Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3413581 Australia 08/25/2012 09:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3413581 Australia 08/25/2012 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20959814 clavius No air therefore no dust cloud [link to www.badastronomy.com] riiiiiiiight!..then how do you explain the dust clouds formed by the moonbuggy..that kind of dust cloud should cover any tracks or LM blast off left behind. |
northerntomcat (OP) User ID: 13843244 Canada 08/25/2012 09:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That should read 'lost' Moon footage. Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD No. He presented stuff he was made to believe constitutes evidence. Big difference. NOT spelling. You used the wrong WORD. Using LEM is a dead give-away you never ever read any Apollo material. clavius Quoting: Aussie Coward 3413581 clavius is a govt. site. you expect any one who can think for themselves actually beileve anything from clavius? Poisoning the well is fallacious rhetoric. PROOF them wrong. Disproof their facts, their demonstrations, their logic, their professional expertise. Just one item. I challenge you. All you ever do is make accusation you fail miserable at supporting with evidence. Don't you realise that such antics makes you look like a irrelevant loser. [link to www.france24.com] Quoting: amywood71605 Scroll down a bit and there is a pic of what he wore to the moon, look close at the boots, notice the heel is a bit thicker especially That's a museum display, how do you know those boots are identical to the ones that are on the Moon? Here's a better pic of that display: [link to upload.wikimedia.org] Obviously not EVA boots. The real one's look more like this: [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] Now here: Quoting: amywood71605 [link to supralimen.wordpress.com] his footprint, its totally flat/all the same, I would think the heel being a bit thicker would NOT leave a print so even, no? That's not even Armstrong's print. Why don't you guys ever double-check your 'facts'. That's Aldrin's print, he made it very deliberately and carefully for the express purpose of it being photographed. Yes you are spot on. What Amywood was showing was the anti-static boots worn in the LM. If you cross country ski, start with a small country. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3413581 Australia 08/25/2012 09:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No air therefore no dust cloud [link to www.badastronomy.com] riiiiiiiight!..then how do you explain the dust clouds formed by the moonbuggy..that kind of dust cloud should cover any tracks or LM blast off left behind. uhh, HELLO? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20959814 Australia 08/25/2012 10:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No air therefore no dust cloud [link to www.badastronomy.com] riiiiiiiight!..then how do you explain the dust clouds formed by the moonbuggy..that kind of dust cloud should cover any tracks or LM blast off left behind. Didn't read it, did you? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12267505 Poland 08/25/2012 10:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That should read 'lost' Moon footage. Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD No. He presented stuff he was made to believe constitutes evidence. Big difference. NOT spelling. You used the wrong WORD. Using LEM is a dead give-away you never ever read any Apollo material. clavius Quoting: Aussie Coward 3413581 clavius is a govt. site. you expect any one who can think for themselves actually beileve anything from clavius? Poisoning the well is fallacious rhetoric. PROOF them wrong. Disproof their facts, their demonstrations, their logic, their professional expertise. Just one item. I challenge you. All you ever do is make accusation you fail miserable at supporting with evidence. Don't you realise that such antics makes you look like a irrelevant loser. [link to www.france24.com] Quoting: amywood71605 Scroll down a bit and there is a pic of what he wore to the moon, look close at the boots, notice the heel is a bit thicker especially That's a museum display, how do you know those boots are identical to the ones that are on the Moon? Here's a better pic of that display: [link to upload.wikimedia.org] Obviously not EVA boots. The real one's look more like this: [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] Now here: Quoting: amywood71605 [link to supralimen.wordpress.com] his footprint, its totally flat/all the same, I would think the heel being a bit thicker would NOT leave a print so even, no? That's not even Armstrong's print. Why don't you guys ever double-check your 'facts'. That's Aldrin's print, he made it very deliberately and carefully for the express purpose of it being photographed. Yes you are spot on. What Amywood was showing was the anti-static boots worn in the LM. Care to tell us how the astronauts stayed cool? Did they strap Trane a/c to their back in the heat? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22462914 United States 08/25/2012 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | over 40yrs and counting. and not a single fucker as ever gone back. i'm sorry but that shit aint right Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22595684 nobody's been over like 800 miles out since the last "mission" in the 70's. they supposedly went 230,000 miles there, landed on the moon first try, and successfully blasted off the moon and flew 230,000 miles back, in 1969. It's 2012 and NASA can't even get a lander to take off without blowing up. THIS |
grasptheuniverse User ID: 22592897 Australia 08/25/2012 10:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | He owes us nothing. Quoting: Starry eyes We owe him thanks. If and that is a very small if he actually knew something, why would he owe the general public especially if he had a threat. When did we become the professionals and the ones with the knowledge about what "really went on". We most certainly dont owe him any thanks why because he went to the moon big deal caz |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22051535 United States 08/25/2012 10:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That should read 'lost' Moon footage. Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD No. He presented stuff he was made to believe constitutes evidence. Big difference. NOT spelling. You used the wrong WORD. Using LEM is a dead give-away you never ever read any Apollo material. clavius Quoting: Aussie Coward 3413581 clavius is a govt. site. you expect any one who can think for themselves actually beileve anything from clavius? Poisoning the well is fallacious rhetoric. PROOF them wrong. Disproof their facts, their demonstrations, their logic, their professional expertise. Just one item. I challenge you. All you ever do is make accusation you fail miserable at supporting with evidence. Don't you realise that such antics makes you look like a irrelevant loser. [link to www.france24.com] Quoting: amywood71605 Scroll down a bit and there is a pic of what he wore to the moon, look close at the boots, notice the heel is a bit thicker especially That's a museum display, how do you know those boots are identical to the ones that are on the Moon? Here's a better pic of that display: [link to upload.wikimedia.org] Obviously not EVA boots. The real one's look more like this: [link to www.hq.nasa.gov] Now here: Quoting: amywood71605 [link to supralimen.wordpress.com] his footprint, its totally flat/all the same, I would think the heel being a bit thicker would NOT leave a print so even, no? That's not even Armstrong's print. Why don't you guys ever double-check your 'facts'. That's Aldrin's print, he made it very deliberately and carefully for the express purpose of it being photographed. Yes you are spot on. What Amywood was showing was the anti-static boots worn in the LM. Care to tell us how the astronauts stayed cool? Did they strap Trane a/c to their back in the heat? Did you really just ask how astronauts stayed cool in space? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22538971 United States 08/25/2012 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22486358 United Kingdom 08/25/2012 10:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
s.j User ID: 13337221 United States 08/25/2012 10:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22051535 United States 08/25/2012 10:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | over 40yrs and counting. and not a single fucker as ever gone back. i'm sorry but that shit aint right Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22595684 nobody's been over like 800 miles out since the last "mission" in the 70's. they supposedly went 230,000 miles there, landed on the moon first try, and successfully blasted off the moon and flew 230,000 miles back, in 1969. It's 2012 and NASA can't even get a lander to take off without blowing up. THIS We just landed mars curiosity rover.... that's like 54 millions miles isn't it? At minimum.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3413581 Australia 08/25/2012 10:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20959814 riiiiiiiight!..then how do you explain the dust clouds formed by the moonbuggy..that kind of dust cloud should cover any tracks or LM blast off left behind. Didn't read it, did you? you didn't answer the question. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22107436 United States 08/25/2012 10:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20959814 Australia 08/25/2012 10:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | riiiiiiiight!..then how do you explain the dust clouds formed by the moonbuggy..that kind of dust cloud should cover any tracks or LM blast off left behind. Didn't read it, did you? you didn't answer the question. The links I gave answer your question. Read them. There is no air on the Moon only gravity. Dust will not behave the same way on the Moon as it does on Earth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13337221 United States 08/25/2012 10:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BossBattles User ID: 8410224 United States 08/25/2012 10:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22425278 New Zealand 08/25/2012 10:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and wtf prrof have you ever produced that's not inside your NASA shill handbook? Today, let's try something novel. Let's pretend we are rational adults. Let the accusers proof their claim. That's going to be fun to watch. Braindead black sheeple mumbling and stumbling around, incessantly quoting fringe sites written by people who are only marginally less ignorant and intellectually challenged than they are. Being the good little hoaxie sheep you are I bet you never even tried to look for facts and evidence independently. (Best to start a dedicated thread, BTW. Aussie Coward Proofs The Moon Landings Were Hoaxed!!!) The burden of proof is on those who make the OUTRAGEOUS claim to have traveled to the MOON, not those who say it didn't happen. There is much more evidence AGAINST the moon landing. Your great-great grandparents would be rolling in their graves if they could see how brainwashed you baby boomers are, and how you are all caught in groupthink bullshit. |
BossBattles User ID: 8410224 United States 08/25/2012 10:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | over 40yrs and counting. and not a single fucker as ever gone back. i'm sorry but that shit aint right Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22595684 nobody's been over like 800 miles out since the last "mission" in the 70's. they supposedly went 230,000 miles there, landed on the moon first try, and successfully blasted off the moon and flew 230,000 miles back, in 1969. It's 2012 and NASA can't even get a lander to take off without blowing up. THIS Yes, This. I can say what I want to, even if I'm not serious. |
Rayrayz User ID: 951476 United States 08/25/2012 10:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | over 40yrs and counting. and not a single fucker as ever gone back. i'm sorry but that shit aint right Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22595684 nobody's been over like 800 miles out since the last "mission" in the 70's. they supposedly went 230,000 miles there, landed on the moon first try, and successfully blasted off the moon and flew 230,000 miles back, in 1969. It's 2012 and NASA can't even get a lander to take off without blowing up. THIS We just landed mars curiosity rover.... that's like 54 millions miles isn't it? At minimum.... Exactly. The moon hoaxer believers just tend to keep wildly swinging away even if their claims get repeatedly shot down. It's amazing. btw...I was open to the idea that the moon landings were a hoax until I started reading some of these threads and watched the adherents of a moon landing hoax get repeatedly crushed in debates. I've been observing these for a few years now...haven't seen one thread or argument that can't be debunked. imo...even if there are shills out there defending NASA...if you come from a position of truth, you should be able to pierce through dis info with undeniable truth...I am yet to see it and I have a very open mind to the possibility of massive cover ups and conspiracies. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22425278 New Zealand 08/25/2012 10:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's what the Mars Curiosity rover said when landing on the red planet. You mean that complete and utter farce where a bunch of bad, out of work hollywood extras jumped around in blue shirts like monkeys while a computer image that wasn't even as convincing as a Grand Theft Auto game, showed the "sky crane" drop the rover. SKY CRANE?!?!?!? You idiots will fall for ANYTHING!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10259470 United States 08/25/2012 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22425278 New Zealand 08/25/2012 10:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 8597527 nobody's been over like 800 miles out since the last "mission" in the 70's. they supposedly went 230,000 miles there, landed on the moon first try, and successfully blasted off the moon and flew 230,000 miles back, in 1969. It's 2012 and NASA can't even get a lander to take off without blowing up. THIS We just landed mars curiosity rover.... that's like 54 millions miles isn't it? At minimum.... Exactly. The moon hoaxer believers just tend to keep wildly swinging away even if their claims get repeatedly shot down. It's amazing. btw...I was open to the idea that the moon landings were a hoax until I started reading some of these threads and watched the adherents of a moon landing hoax get repeatedly crushed in debates. I've been observing these for a few years now...haven't seen one thread or argument that can't be debunked. imo...even if there are shills out there defending NASA...if you come from a position of truth, you should be able to pierce through dis info with undeniable truth...I am yet to see it and I have a very open mind to the possibility of massive cover ups and conspiracies. You actually think they send that thing to mars? What a dumb fucking boomer. Why don't you present some of these "un-debunkable" pro-landing arguments, you fucking zionist shill. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22425278 New Zealand 08/25/2012 10:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | God bless Neil Armstrong. I cried when I heard ths. God bless and Speed you. If you don't understand this, fuck you, you basement dwelling mama's boy. game player, sexually confused punk. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10259470 Bwahahahahaha. Typical baby-boomer paid shill insults. Get a new shill handbook, old man. Calling names doesnt change the fact that YOU WERE FOOLED, YOU DUMB OLD FUCKER. |
Mkguyver User ID: 20828274 United States 08/25/2012 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22425278 New Zealand 08/25/2012 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | THIS is what dropped the rover on mars. My little nephew could built a better model with a fuckin erector set. [link to www.youtube.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22425278 New Zealand 08/25/2012 10:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Rayrayz User ID: 951476 United States 08/25/2012 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We just landed mars curiosity rover.... that's like 54 millions miles isn't it? At minimum.... Exactly. The moon hoaxer believers just tend to keep wildly swinging away even if their claims get repeatedly shot down. It's amazing. btw...I was open to the idea that the moon landings were a hoax until I started reading some of these threads and watched the adherents of a moon landing hoax get repeatedly crushed in debates. I've been observing these for a few years now...haven't seen one thread or argument that can't be debunked. imo...even if there are shills out there defending NASA...if you come from a position of truth, you should be able to pierce through dis info with undeniable truth...I am yet to see it and I have a very open mind to the possibility of massive cover ups and conspiracies. You actually think they send that thing to mars? What a dumb fucking boomer. Why don't you present some of these "un-debunkable" pro-landing arguments, you fucking zionist shill. You're a real knuckle-dragging mongoloid if you think I'm a zionist shill. If you have any knowledge of my posting history you would shut your pie hole and go tuck tail. If this Moon hoax theory is such a dangerous threat to the TPTB, then why did ultra Zionist extraordinaire Rupert Murdoch broadcast the special on prime time American network television? Which is really what started this "movement". You don't see any prime time specials about the Israel lobby in America or the Israeli involvement in 911...Do you bozo? Now, why don't you post some of your overwhelming evidence that the moon landings were a hoax and I'll watch and laugh as your theory gets debunked by someone... go ahead Shlomo. |