Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,616 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 125,300
Pageviews Today: 176,495Threads Today: 46Posts Today: 1,141
01:30 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?

 
Truthbetold11
User ID: 22300488
United States
08/27/2012 07:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
Thats the million dollar question. Bif it so easy to go back 6 times. Why not now.? Cause the lie isnt hot anymore. Its accepted as truth
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14143765
United States
08/27/2012 07:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
Would not the Soviets have tracked each mission? Did they ever come out and say it didn't happen? I mean they were on the losing side of the space race.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22619927


Radio waves were beamed from earth to the moon, and reflected back to earth. To any outside listener, it would seem that the communication would be coming from the surface of the moon.
 Quoting: Thor's Hamster


To anyone barely familiar with it they would tell the difference. There were two signals. One came from the surface and did NOT have signs of a reflection. The other came from an orbiting craft and did not have signs of a reflection either. ANYONE capable of tracking and listening can tell there were two signals and one of them was orbiting.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14143765
United States
08/27/2012 08:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
Would not the Soviets have tracked each mission? Did they ever come out and say it didn't happen? I mean they were on the losing side of the space race.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22619927


the rooskies didn't know their ass back in 1969.
anything they had they stole, and didn't have a clue
about how it worked once they had it.

and, now, they've got that douche-bag Putin trying to do it all over again.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22633247


Not true at all. The Russians had been kicking our ass in space. Yuri Gagarin ring a bell? Sputnik? First to orbit the earth? Then we suddenly leap frog past them, put 6 successful missions on the surface of the moon and bring them back, and the Russians NEVER land men on the moon? Makes no sense.

Look at earthly exploration. The Spanish were the first Europeans to land in the Americas. Did the English, French, Russians, etc. throw in the towel? Of course not. They came, too, albeit a little later. Why would it be any different with human exploration of a planetary body? The Russians wouldn't have thrown in the towel. They'd have gone, too, albeit later. But they didn't. Why not?

Remember, America had one asset the Russians didn't have during the Cold War: Hollywood.
 Quoting: Thor's Hamster


The Russians were ahead but only barely and then only until Gemini. The only reason the Russians had some of their "firsts" was because they ignored safety. They were first to orbit 3 men in the same craft only because they squeezed 3 men into a 2 man craft and took out safety equipment to do so. Once the Gemini project started they fell behind while the US learned and practiced techniques needed for Apollo.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14143765
United States
08/27/2012 08:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
Look at the entrance of the module. With space suits on they cannot fit thru opening. Rip off!
 Quoting: congineer 17009595


Not to mention the giant gloves they wore. How would they be able to operate their cameras? They couldn't. It's been tried here on earth by investigators. Can't be done.
 Quoting: Thor's Hamster


There are pictures and video of them fitting through the hatch. That was already mentioned. It seems you are DELIBERATELY ignoring that. The cameras were modified to be used with gloves. Your "researchers" did not have the right gloves nor the right camera and were basically incompetent.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14143765
United States
08/27/2012 08:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
Well do the correct thing and supply him/her with the information they are looking for to rightfully explain how they achieved this lift off based on guess work.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14589973


In some alternate universe, maybe.

The bulk of the people "asking questions" are not interested in answers. They'd be DELIGHTED if no-one answered. What they want is confirmation.

Basic data on the Apollo Program, and the underlying science, isn't hard to find. It takes three things, tho; patience, work, and a willingness to learn something new.



Oh...and another perfect illustration of begging the question, supplied by yourself.

"..how they achieved this lift off based on guess work."

No, there was no lift-off achieved on guess work. That is a perfect framing of a "question" that includes the answer the questioner really desires.
 Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183


It was mostly guess work muse.

I know of no unmanned Lunar launch practice runs using the same lander type.

It is a little silly to answer a question with 'they don't want answers' - of cause they do hence the bloody question.

I do remember them trying out the Lunar Module on Earth..it almost killed the pilot if I remember correctly.

Anyhoo' - Answers would be gratefully appreciated if you have any.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 14589973


Why should they have an unmanned launch practice when the craft was DESIGNED to be use manned?

What was tried on Earth was NOT the lunar module it was a TRAINER. It had hundreds of successful flight and only failed due to unrelated reasons.
Truthbetold11
User ID: 22300488
United States
08/27/2012 08:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
Hey buzz im running for political. Office. Your endorsement would be awesome. I stand for space exploration and new worlds. Oh i forgot. Part of the lie is to keep low profile and not endorse anyone. You serve mother usa and govt.
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
Contrarian's Contrarian

User ID: 19507663
Netherlands
08/27/2012 08:12 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
How the LEM took off from the moon is easier to explain than HOW IT LANDED. Just do a thought experiment for a minute on how you'd land a rocket regardless of gravity? Common sense tells you it would flip over.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21457069

Than common sense is wrong.

There are so many holes in the NASA story that a child could see through it. Actually, I've known from a child that the whole thing was a hoax.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21457069

You didn't know, you believed.

No adult could ever answer my question: "Daddy, how do you land a rocket?"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21457069

So there were no rocket scientists in your milieu. Quell surprise.

There are many other obvious holes in the NASA moon landing hoax:
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21457069

Only according to those who don't have clue.

- Cooling - how is heat transfer possible in space?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21457069

How does the Sun heat the Earth?

- Suits - how did those phony suits work?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21457069

A simple party balloon can keep air in.

- Power - how did they power things, batteries?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21457069

Why do you need to ask?

- Sound - how did they overcome the speech delay?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21457069

They didn't.

- LEM - how did that piece of tinfoil work?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21457069

Appeals to ignorance are fallacious rhetoric.
It only exposes you don't have a clue.

Do you really think that ignorance is a basis for any kind of reliable conclusion.
You got the biggest library in world history right at your fingertips.
The answers are all there. None of it is secret.
Just stop being lazy.
book
Hatred is a cancer upon the world.
It rots the mind and blackens the heart.


Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2075492
United States
08/27/2012 08:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
For me some of the most damning evidence among the mountain of clues, is the pictures themselves of the moon landing.

Not only are they of professional quality, and seemingly taken by a professional photographer in big bulky suits, with huge gloves, with the camera attached to their chest... which of course may be possible. However, somehow the pictures managed to be "clear" despite all the radiation the cameras were exposed to. Test show when the film they used were exposed lower levels of radiation, the pictures were "foggy"... There was an interview somewhere with camera provider, and they said that no special modification were made to the camera to account for radiation.

I've seen a few claims that the radiation levels weren't high enough, but they always base that off the figures which NASA reports they were exposed too...

For me, there are just too many clues that contradict what NASA claims.
Thor's Hamster

User ID: 1248699
United States
08/27/2012 08:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
If we sent men to the surface of the moon successfully 6 times and back with 1960s technology in under 8 years (1962: JFK's speech. 1969: Apollo 11 allegedly), why would it now take us 18 years to return men to the moon with 2012 technology? That's ludicrous.
Apollo astronauts couldn't have passed through Van Allen's Belt. Van Allen wore suspenders.
Thor's Hamster

User ID: 1248699
United States
08/27/2012 08:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
For me some of the most damning evidence among the mountain of clues, is the pictures themselves of the moon landing.

Not only are they of professional quality, and seemingly taken by a professional photographer in big bulky suits, with huge gloves, with the camera attached to their chest... which of course may be possible. However, somehow the pictures managed to be "clear" despite all the radiation the cameras were exposed to. Test show when the film they used were exposed lower levels of radiation, the pictures were "foggy"... There was an interview somewhere with camera provider, and they said that no special modification were made to the camera to account for radiation.

I've seen a few claims that the radiation levels weren't high enough, but they always base that off the figures which NASA reports they were exposed too...

For me, there are just too many clues that contradict what NASA claims.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492


Great post. I agree 100%.
Apollo astronauts couldn't have passed through Van Allen's Belt. Van Allen wore suspenders.
Thor's Hamster

User ID: 1248699
United States
08/27/2012 08:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
It's completely obvious that the video of them driving the lunar rover was in slow motion. As was their walking and jumping.
Apollo astronauts couldn't have passed through Van Allen's Belt. Van Allen wore suspenders.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2075492
United States
08/27/2012 08:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
[
Do you really think that ignorance is a basis for any kind of reliable conclusion.
You got the biggest library in world history right at your fingertips.
The answers are all there. None of it is secret.
Just stop being lazy.
book


Why the fuck do so many people have to "resort" to attacking others views! Are you so attached to your views that that you're unable to see things a different way, and consider that their view could be possible?

There is a lot of danger is being so closed minded. Look, I think the moon landings (as presented by NASA) are a complete fraud... but -- could it have happned --- I'm open minded enough to admit that it's possible, or an alternate story exits.

I just don't get why dumb fucks feel like they have to attack others views. It just happens on GLP too much -- there are to many infintile morans (like this one) on here to carry out an interesting and deep conversation.

There -- I attacked someone too, now I'm an offical GLP fuckturd.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22688453
India
08/27/2012 08:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
The Moon landing was a hoax.

In order to crack it, you need to compare the multitude of photographs.
Watch for terrain similarities.
Supposedly at different locations.
Watch for the same background at supposedly different locations.

Here's a video thats shows it.
Watch @ 5:08

[link to www.youtube.com]

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2075492
United States
08/27/2012 08:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
It's completely obvious that the video of them driving the lunar rover was in slow motion. As was their walking and jumping.
 Quoting: Thor's Hamster


Yes! Agreed!

Also, somehow the lunar rover "kicks" up dust, yet the Lunar lander somehow came to an easy rest, while not disturbing any of the sorrounding area or seemingly moving any moon dust at all.

I mean some of this stuff is downright laughable when you start lining up the clues.
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
Contrarian's Contrarian

User ID: 19507663
Netherlands
08/27/2012 08:44 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
For me some of the most damning evidence among the mountain of clues, is the pictures themselves of the moon landing.

Not only are they of professional quality,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492

They did train in using their cameras for months.

and seemingly taken by a professional photographer in big bulky suits, with huge gloves, with the camera attached to their chest... which of course may be possible.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492

The camera came with a wide-angle lens and a number of pre-set settings.
Not really that hard, and still many pictures show a collection of blobs.
The cameras were hooked, NOT bolted to the suits, they could be hand held.
Which is seen very often in the photographs.

However, somehow the pictures managed to be "clear" despite all the radiation the cameras were exposed to. Test show when the film they used were exposed lower levels of radiation, the pictures were "foggy"... There was an interview somewhere with camera provider, and they said that no special modification were made to the camera to account for radiation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492

Cameras are reflective metal boxes anyway.
The magazines were third party, and were also reflective metal boxes.
A backscatterer uses stronger x-rays at higher fluxes then the Sun usually produces, but a few metres of air is enough to attenuate it.
So will a sheet of aluminium.
Still there are many obvious cosmic ray strikes in the pics, and plenty of sun strikes.

I've seen a few claims that the radiation levels weren't high enough, but they always base that off the figures which NASA reports they were exposed too...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492

And data of the radiation environment in cis-lunar space from other space agencies.

For me, there are just too many clues that contradict what NASA claims.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492

A few of them should have been resolved now.
book


Do you really think that ignorance is a basis for any kind of reliable conclusion.
You got the biggest library in world history right at your fingertips.
The answers are all there. None of it is secret.
Just stop being lazy.
book
 Quoting: HD

Why the fuck do so many people have to "resort" to attacking others views!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492

Your 'view' is a vile libellous attack against tens of thousands of people.
You your self admit that it is based on no information what so ever.

An honourable person would not do what you do.

Are you so attached to your views that that you're unable to see things a different way, and consider that their view could be possible?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492

After 40 years of hoaxies failing to proof a single claim, there is no reason to believe that they are on to anything.
Hoaxism is a failure, nobody that matters considers it as anything other than material for water-cooler jokes.
book
Hatred is a cancer upon the world.
It rots the mind and blackens the heart.


Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
Thor's Hamster

User ID: 1248699
United States
08/27/2012 08:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
It's completely obvious that the video of them driving the lunar rover was in slow motion. As was their walking and jumping.
 Quoting: Thor's Hamster


Yes! Agreed!

Also, somehow the lunar rover "kicks" up dust, yet the Lunar lander somehow came to an easy rest, while not disturbing any of the sorrounding area or seemingly moving any moon dust at all.

I mean some of this stuff is downright laughable when you start lining up the clues.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492


Yep.
Apollo astronauts couldn't have passed through Van Allen's Belt. Van Allen wore suspenders.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22688453
India
08/27/2012 08:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
Three things you need to get past the clever hoax-debunkers.

1. Background anomalies.
2. Cross hair anomalies.

and 3.
Research television transmission technology of the late sixties, with reference to transmission of signals from the lunar surface.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2075492
United States
08/27/2012 08:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
The Moon landing was a hoax.

In order to crack it, you need to compare the multitude of photographs.
Watch for terrain similarities.
Supposedly at different locations.
Watch for the same background at supposedly different locations.

Here's a video thats shows it.
Watch @ 5:08

[link to www.youtube.com]


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22688453


Also, there is a video showing the astronauts using a template in the window to create the illusion that they were far away from earth, when in fact they were in low earth orbit.

Why would they do that? For what reason? Why aren't there more pictures of their some 480,000 mile adventure to and from the moon?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22688741
08/27/2012 08:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
Guys, youtube that famous interview after landing

Now, when you look that interview you look at the people who just achived one of the biggest things in history!
So do they look/act like that!?

No, they look upset, confused, even scared... like they guilty for something!
I mean, there's no positive emotions there...only fake...look at their body language when they answering questions!
Come On
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22637174


bumpthat
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22642230


bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22575117
United Kingdom
08/27/2012 08:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
Just because you're not smart enough to wrap your tiny brain around it doesn't mean it couldn't be done.

No one said it was easy but it was quite doable, all the problems were solved, and we got it done.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22631821


Yes, im no rocket scientist.

But it took hundreds of men with 1000's of lb's of fuel to get off the earth... and centuries of trial and error...

yet we send up 3 men with NO REAL firsthand knowledge of lunar aerodynamics? just theory? doesnt hold water.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6231580


The engine was built on earth anf the took it with them. They just turned the thing on and ensured it was pointing in the correct direction.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22688453
India
08/27/2012 09:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
The Moon landing was a hoax.

In order to crack it, you need to compare the multitude of photographs.
Watch for terrain similarities.
Supposedly at different locations.
Watch for the same background at supposedly different locations.

Here's a video thats shows it.
Watch @ 5:08

[link to www.youtube.com]


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22688453


Also, there is a video showing the astronauts using a template in the window to create the illusion that they were far away from earth, when in fact they were in low earth orbit.

Why would they do that? For what reason? Why aren't there more pictures of their some 480,000 mile adventure to and from the moon?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492


Lol,those videos will shortly be removed from the net.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22688453
India
08/27/2012 09:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
There was no photoshop in those days.
So the image manipulation they did was primitive.
Compare multiple photographs for repitations.

Here's a good site.
Check out the flipped flag repetation. They really can't cover their ass on this:
[link to www.aulis.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19099505
United States
08/27/2012 09:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
It was only the 3 astronauts, right? No rocket scientists. No reconstructed apparatus. And what about the operations of firing a rocket WITH 3 MEN AND FUEL, CAMERA'S etc FROM THE MOON? How the hell could any scientist speculate that 3 astronauts would be able to take off by themseves? From point zero, the amount of fuel needed? What about the times; we needed to send disinfo to the Soviet Union... 1+1 = 2.

It was fake. Recondition your mind: Aint NO ONE been on the moon.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6231580


Go visit NASA in Houston. Take a tour of some facilities there! I have, sure convinced me. It seems to me like they were actually capable of more than that, even way back then!

imagine where we might be already had we kept pushing instead of laying off the program 'cause of pussies like you! ..lol, sorry too much glp already.

Ask yourself this: Are the mars rover missions fake? ..Isn't there currently a rover "the size of a car" on the surface of mars?
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
Contrarian's Contrarian

User ID: 19507663
Netherlands
08/27/2012 09:57 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
A fool can ask more questions in a minute than a thousand sages can answer in a life time.


The Moon landing was a hoax.

In order to crack it, you need to compare the multitude of photographs.
Watch for terrain similarities.
Supposedly at different locations.
Watch for the same background at supposedly different locations.

Here's a video thats shows it.
Watch @ 5:08

[link to www.youtube.com]


 Quoting: Indian Coward 22688453

The FOX Special is from 2001.
It was debunked in 2001.
[link to www.badastronomy.com]

The TV-star voice-over saying that the second picture was taken in a different location almost qualifies as a lie.
It was taken a few hundred metres from were the first picture was taken.
Considering that the mountain in the background is many kilometres away why should it not look the same.

Three things you need to get past the clever hoax-debunkers.

1. Background anomalies.
 Quoting: Indian Coward 22688453

All those 'anomalies' are in the same category of non-anomalies.

2. Cross hair anomalies.
 Quoting: Indian Coward 22688453

Image bleed is to simple an explanation for hoaxies, isn't it?
Somehow it must be evidence that the images were manufactured in a most fiendishly complicated manner.

and 3.
Research television transmission technology of the late sixties, with reference to transmission of signals from the lunar surface.
 Quoting: Indian Coward 22688453

Indeed. Do that.


[link to www.youtube.com]

Dwight Steven-Boniecki wrote the book on that technology. [link to www.amazon.com]
He occasionally hangs out on ApolloHoax.net and seems willing to answer any question you might have.

Here's a good site.
Check out the flipped flag repetation. They really can't cover their ass on this:
[link to www.aulis.com]
 Quoting: Indian Coward 22688453

You should do an overlay.

Presenting Jack White as some sort of expert is kind of funny.
The guy can't even tell left from right.
book

Also, there is a video showing the astronauts using a template in the window to create the illusion that they were far away from earth, when in fact they were in low earth orbit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492

The only honourable thing Bart Sibrel has ever done in his public life is to formally retract that claim.

He kind of had to after it was no longer possible for him to maintain that he didn't have the FULL video when he made the original accusation.
The FULL video that has the part that clearly demonstrate his 'theory' is hogwash.

The only thing this episode demonstrates is that Bart Sibrel deliberately manufactured false evidence.
Caveat emptor.

Why would they do that? For what reason?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492

Since they didn't do that that is a non-question.

Why aren't there more pictures of their some 480,000 mile adventure to and from the moon?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492

How many pictures of that are there now?
book

Darryl Cunningham Investigates The Moon Hoax [link to darryl-cunningham.blogspot.com]
Moon Base Clavius, for all your debunking needs [link to www.xmission.com]

Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 08/27/2012 02:51 PM
Hatred is a cancer upon the world.
It rots the mind and blackens the heart.


Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22692111
India
08/27/2012 10:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
BS/

Background anomalies are pretty apparent.
You try to debunk using vague explanations as to why terrain shouldn't look the same from different angles. Lol
What about those shots that were said to be taken from DIFFERENT locations but are an exact copy? hmmmm?

Shilling pays big time.
AND NASA is not a benovalent humanity organisation dedicated to helping science. NASA is a MILITARY ORGANISTATION AND they have millions of dollars in resources available to defend themselves against hoaxers, including paying internet shills .


Go here, and come back and tell me how you can explain yourself against a proffessional study that totally PROVES that the moon landing was a hoax:
Click on the third link from left:
[link to www.aulis.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22692111
India
08/27/2012 10:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
The 'that was debunked long ago ' shit still works.
But it cannot fool those who are really interested in getting the truth.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 536288
United States
08/27/2012 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
Cause they didn't...

Made in a Hollywood Movie Studio...

[link to www.cnn.com]

You figure if they had that technology they wouldn't have to re-create the wheel...

Don't believe everything the gov't proposes to the massses..

Needed to be first since Russia beat us with a man in space...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22688212
United Kingdom
08/27/2012 10:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
they left the camera man behind. thats not nice naughty
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22692111
India
08/27/2012 10:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
It was only the 3 astronauts, right? No rocket scientists. No reconstructed apparatus. And what about the operations of firing a rocket WITH 3 MEN AND FUEL, CAMERA'S etc FROM THE MOON? How the hell could any scientist speculate that 3 astronauts would be able to take off by themseves? From point zero, the amount of fuel needed? What about the times; we needed to send disinfo to the Soviet Union... 1+1 = 2.

It was fake. Recondition your mind: Aint NO ONE been on the moon.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6231580


Go visit NASA in Houston. Take a tour of some facilities there! I have, sure convinced me. It seems to me like they were actually capable of more than that, even way back then!

imagine where we might be already had we kept pushing instead of laying off the program 'cause of pussies like you! ..lol, sorry too much glp already.

Ask yourself this: Are the mars rover missions fake? ..Isn't there currently a rover "the size of a car" on the surface of mars?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19099505


They need real technology to get them to Earth Orbit.
A nerd is easily fooled by all the big equipment.
You need a proffessional eye to tell the difference between what is the truth and what is a hoax.

Anyways, I can't comment becos I havent actually been there.
Im judging stuff from what I can see and hear in the media.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2075492
United States
08/27/2012 12:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?
A fool can ask more questions in a minute than a thousand sages can answer in a life time.


The Moon landing was a hoax.

In order to crack it, you need to compare the multitude of photographs.
Watch for terrain similarities.
Supposedly at different locations.
Watch for the same background at supposedly different locations.

Here's a video thats shows it.
Watch @ 5:08

[link to www.youtube.com]


 Quoting: Indian Coward 22688453

The FOX Special is from 2001.
It was debunked in 2001.
[link to www.badastronomy.com]

The TV-star voice-over saying that the second picture was taken in a different location almost qualifies as a lie.
It was taken a few hundred metres from were the first picture was taken.
Considering that the mountain in the background is many kilometres away why should it not look the same.

Three things you need to get past the clever hoax-debunkers.

1. Background anomalies.
 Quoting: Indian Coward 22688453

All those 'anomalies' are in the same category of non-anomalies.

2. Cross hair anomalies.
 Quoting: Indian Coward 22688453

Image bleed is to simple an explanation for hoaxies, isn't it.
Somehow it must be evidence that the images were manufactured in a most fiendishly complicated manner.

and 3.
Research television transmission technology of the late sixties, with reference to transmission of signals from the lunar surface.
 Quoting: Indian Coward 22688453

Indeed. Do that.

[link to www.youtube.com]

Dwight Steven-Boniecki wrote the book on that technology. [link to www.amazon.com]
He occasionally hangs out on ApolloHoax.net and seems willing to answer any question you might have.

Here's a good site.
Check out the flipped flag repetation. They really can't cover their ass on this:
[link to www.aulis.com]
 Quoting: Indian Coward 22688453

You should do an overlay.

Presenting Jack White as some sort of expert is kind of funny.
The guy can't even tell left from right.
book

Also, there is a video showing the astronauts using a template in the window to create the illusion that they were far away from earth, when in fact they were in low earth orbit.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492

The only honourable thing Bart Sibrel has ever done in his public life is to formally detract that claim.

He kind of had to after it was no longer possible for him to maintain that he didn't have the FULL video when he made the original accusation.
The FULL video that has the part that clearly demonstrate his 'theory' is hogwash.

The only thing this episode demonstrates is that Bart Sibrel deliberately manufactured false evidence.
Caveat emptor.

Why would they do that? For what reason?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492

Since they didn't do that that is a non-question.

Why aren't there more pictures of their some 480,000 mile adventure to and from the moon?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2075492

How many pictures of that are there now?
book

Darryl Cunningham Investigates The Moon Hoax [link to darryl-cunningham.blogspot.com]
Moon Base Clavius, for all your debunking needs [link to www.xmission.com]
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD



Look, like I said, it's entirely possible the moon landings occured... I get it, and I'm open to that! But unlike you, I don't just dismiss the holes in the story and the obvious clues that are out there that NASA produced this "magic"... that is careless IMO. And some of these clues are extremly laughable... you've got to admit it's a distict possibility that the moon landings could have easily been faked. I mean it's easy to see that NASA benifited in a huge way here... you at least see that is a possibility --- don't you?

News