If the Moon landing was real: How the hell did they take off FROM the moon?

the Van Allen Belt shields Earth from the murderous
solar radiation in open Space. even the ISS has to
stay in low-Earth orbit (below the Van Allen Belt) to
protect the astronauts from the murderous solar radiation.

Pity that ain't true.


[link to www.astronomycafe.net]

the Van Allen Belt shields Earth from the murderous
solar radiation in open Space. even the ISS has to
stay in low-Earth orbit (below the Van Allen Belt) to
protect the astronauts from the murderous solar radiation.

Sasquatch has been to Saturn...

[link to www.youtube.com]

yeah, that's why nobody lives up North or South where it doesn't cover. Oh wait, they do. you forgot also that the ISS routinely passes through a low hanging part of the Van Allen belts.

well, as long as they stay *under* the umbrella of the
Van Allen Belt, then, they are shielded from all the
murderous solar radiation, now, then, aren't they.

yeah, that's why nobody lives up North or South where it doesn't cover. Oh wait, they do. you forgot also that the ISS routinely passes through a low hanging part of the Van Allen belts.

They are BELTS not SPHERES. They do NOT cover the higher latitudes yet people still live there. Therefore you are wrong.

the Moon is 20% of Earth's gravity. the LEM would
have had to have 20% of the fuel in a Saturn 5 rocket
to escape the Moon's gravity. the LEM couldn't possibly
have had any more fuel than a 4th of July roman candle.

the whole thing is a FAKE!

It was only the 3 astronauts, right? No rocket scientists. No reconstructed apparatus. And what about the operations of firing a rocket WITH 3 MEN AND FUEL, CAMERA'S etc FROM THE MOON? How the hell could any scientist speculate that 3 astronauts would be able to take off by themseves? From point zero, the amount of fuel needed? What about the times; we needed to send disinfo to the Soviet Union... 1+1 = 2.

It was fake. Recondition your mind: Aint NO ONE been on the moon.

The moon is 1/6 the earth's gravity. Plus you also have to consider other things like no atmosphere to push through, and that the weight of the LEM was a lot less than 1/6 of the Saturn 5 rocket. Plus a piece of what didn't even land on the moon, but was rotating around. I forgot what it was called.

But the proof is in the calculations. Can you do the calculations to prove that they couldn't get off the moon?

If they faked it, wouldn't it be easier to fake more than enough of the fuel they needed? I mean, if they're going to fake it, why fake it in a way that would show that they couldn't get off the moon.

Again, the proof is in the calculations. You must know something since you're so sure, so give us the calculations as to why it couldn't get off the moon.

nope, no doubt.

just your stupid is hurting my head at the moment. It will pass when I completely forget about you and your post in the next few minutes.

the time I have wasted on you hurts my head

Guys, youtube that famous interview after landing

Now, when you look that interview you look at the people who just achived one of the biggest things in history!
So do they look/act like that!?

No, they look upset, confused, even scared... like they guilty for something!
I mean, there's no positive emotions there...only fake...look at their body language when they answering questions!
Come On

that

It was only the 3 astronauts, right? No rocket scientists. No reconstructed apparatus. And what about the operations of firing a rocket WITH 3 MEN AND FUEL, CAMERA'S etc FROM THE MOON? How the hell could any scientist speculate that 3 astronauts would be able to take off by themseves? From point zero, the amount of fuel needed? What about the times; we needed to send disinfo to the Soviet Union... 1+1 = 2.

It was fake. Recondition your mind: Aint NO ONE been on the moon.

Stupidly wrong. Look up "Angry Alligator" some time. Orbital rendezvous WAS a tough nut, so they made sure to work on it a lot in Earth orbit. And (Apollo 10) in lunar orbit.

And, really, EVERY spacecraft that lands on another world is having to join up with an orbiting body.




What the fracking hell is a "Stationary" orbit?

Anyhow, your profile for the C/SM (not the CM at that stage) is dead wrong. It arrives at the Moon and performs a circularizing burn. It is thus in a low and stable lunar orbit. The LM detaches, comes in and lands in a path along the plane of the C/SM's orbit. The ascent stage lifts off and accelerates along that same plane. It is timed, also; they know damned well where the C/SM is the entire time.

The astronauts transfer, the ascent stage is discarded to crash back on the Moon, the SM engine lights to put them back on intercept with the Earth.

The delta-v for each stage of this operation is easy to look up (and slightly more difficult to calculate) and the propellant masses are documented. There are no mysterious and hidden maneuvers required.





Not gravity assist, actually. More like free-return trajectories -- an elongated ellipse with the apogee further out from Earth than the Moon is.

But I assume from the above that you are denying ALL landings, manned and unmanned, other than direct-to-impact such as the Ranger probes or the early Lunas.

But of course you are too pig-ignorant to be specific about whatever technology you think is missing.

if just one more big asteroid hits Jupiter, that will be
the magic number adding the mass needed for the entire
planet and atmosphere to collapse in on itself and
become a thermonuclear fusion furnace (aka star)

Good grief!!


The lowest mass limit for a star is about 0.08 solar masses.
This is more than 150 times the mass of Jupiter.

o.k. just because the murderous solar radiation turns
the Van Allen Belt into a giant particle accelerator
doesn't mean i'm wrong. that is simply the mechanism
by which the Van Allen Belt attenuates the murderous solar
radiation from the Earth.

moron.

if just one more big asteroid hits Jupiter, that will be
the magic number adding the mass needed for the entire
planet and atmosphere to collapse in on itself and
become a thermonuclear fusion furnace (aka star)

It was only the 3 astronauts, right? No rocket scientists. No reconstructed apparatus. And what about the operations of firing a rocket WITH 3 MEN AND FUEL, CAMERA'S etc FROM THE MOON? How the hell could any scientist speculate that 3 astronauts would be able to take off by themseves? From point zero, the amount of fuel needed? What about the times; we needed to send disinfo to the Soviet Union... 1+1 = 2.

It was fake. Recondition your mind: Aint NO ONE been on the moon.

someone said that the command module was orbiting 30 miles above. now, how could that little bitty LEM possibly be
holding enough fuel to overcome even 20% the gravity of Earth?

Anyone arguing orbital mechanics that doesn't know the meaning of the term "Stationary Orbit" automatically gains the rank of Chief Idiot.

We're done here, threads over.