The NINth MONTH 911 QUAKE WARNING & 188 QUAKE CYCLE ALERT

Usually the normal most minimum parameter are quakes 5.7 that are around the cut off of whats deemed the category of a LARGE Quake.

But there are very RARE INSTANCES where quakes can be as low as 5.0 and still be considered SIGNIFICANT... and you can find many examples of this at USGS where they will list a 4.7 in the SIGNIFICANT list but exclude a 5.9 or in some cases I've seen them exclude a 6.3+ replaced with a 5.0.

With that context said, I can now address your question further...

Though a LARGE QUAKE is typically considered to be above 5.6 or 5.7 , I have moved away from counting those types of quakes except in rare cases when it might happen in a location that rarely has quakes, and a perfect example is the quake last august 23rd in VIRGINIA ... while it was only a 5.8, it was large enough to do damage due to its depth and location.

So the quakes I focus on then, are closer to minimum 6.0 in counting for hits on the ley lines. However, my standard for quakes that would validate a prediction, the standard mag is closer to a minimum 6.5+.

As for the 188 cycle... the parameter for quakes that qualify as a validation, is narrowed down to those 7+ absolute minimum which would again also depend on LOCATION and DEPTH since a 7 MAG under a major metropolitan city would probably do serious damage versus it hitting a remote location.

The only other issue i haven't discussed here yet has to do with the other classifications of LARGE versus MAJOR or MEGA and GREAT.

hope that helps or addresses your question.

lNIN

9/9 TO 9/11 +/- 1 day... so that would include 9/10 which I pointed out since 9/10 also contains 911 (9/10/12) that follows the THEME of this months warning.

the next date and window for a major quake after that, begins around the 20th to the 22nd, however the earliest date would be +/- 1 day from the 19th which is the only update or alteration I'd add to this months warning.

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/01/2012 02:30 AM

Just a reminder to all... we're still in a very dangerous quake window over the next 24 to 48 hours

I've said yesterday's 7.6 could have been a foreshock.

meaning another major or even mega quake likely during this window that could be much bigger IMO

so don't forget what I've said about 9 1 1 for the NINth month because 9/01/12 also contains the date code of 911

7.3 minimum 8.3+ to 8.8++ and even a 9.1 would fit nicely this month

just sayin ;/

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/01/2012 05:06 AM

My personal opinion?

1) SEISMIC +/- 1 DAY of the 16th
2) FALSE FLAG TERRORISM or NUCLEAR EVENT/WMD
3) ATTACK ON IRAN
4) VOLCANIC EVENT
5) ECONOMIC COLLAPSE
6) MARTIAL LAW
7) DEATH OF A FAMOUS LEADER
8) DISCLOSURE EVENT

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/01/2012 05:29 AM

Oh... Locations & Regions to watch today through 9/02

ALASKA
LA TO SF
CHILE & PERU & BOGOTA/EQUADOR/VENEZUELA
NZ
JAPAN

Nice work


Kind Sir
I will be rude for you.

To the shill Fuck off cunt you are certainly a


The 3 virtues
Ignorance, Arrogance and Compassion

he he

good job grasshoppa

thank you for that... was wondering if anyone would notice today's date is also connected to what appears to be a pretty rare and significant VOLCANIC AWAKENING.

So now lets look more closely at the prophetic ALLEGORY in my NIN 11 WARNING about an EVENT to occur connected to SEPTEMBER & date with
9 1 1 to see if any of the unique wording correlates to this headline...

Earthquake swarm awakens Alaskan volcano, dormant for 182 years: alert level raised

[link to theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com]

Thread: The NINth MONTH 911 QUAKE WARNING & 188 QUAKE CYCLE ALERT
-------------------------------------------------------------​--
Glad I don't live on the WESTERN COAST LINES of NORTH & SOUTH AMERICA before some of the 18/8 Cycle has compressed to 8!

Alaska & BC
SF & Seattle/Oregon
LA to Ensenada & Baja DE Mexico
Venice & Allah Juela
Temple of the New Son in the Land of the New Sea & Sun

If my name were Andrea, I'd probably be feeling chilles up and down my SPINE lately and in the upcoming DAY5 and Month5

I wonder which will be 1st?

a DEEP WeL, or shallow it be a HeLix around the Great Sphere of the RED ARC and San Francisco's Tetrahedral Cathedral?

Remember 9 & 11 is a DATE of REFLECTION for Terror, Quakes and a Selection.

Fire above the Gates of an Angels Harp, shall rise from Below an ANCIENT city
of Gold and PORT Of a RICH Virgin Sacrifice around the 13th day of DIANA's Fame and 16th(1 off) Year of the inFAMOUS 902.
============================================

Notice anything about the allegory and key words I wrote in red?

NORTH AMERICA
region

18/8
18 & 8 or
1 & two 8's
1, 8, 2 ... how long has this Volcano been DORMANT???
1 8 2 YEARS

ALASKA
first location named which happens to be the LOCATION OF VOLCANO

9 & 11
in fact 9/11 appears in the timezone change today

Fire above the Gates of an Angels Harp shall rise from Below
an almost perfect analogy to describe MAGMA or FIRE RISING from BELOW during the AWAKENING of a VOLCANO at a location connected to an angels HARP...

Where is HAARP located? ALASKA

13th day of DIANA's Fame
or 13th DAY
The MONTH Diana DIED is the 8th Month

What's the date that PRINCESS DIANA DIED? The 31st of AUGUST or 8/31 ...whats 8/31 in EURO DATING or REVERSE?

13/8
analogous to the 13th day of Diana's Fame (8)

Sacrifice around the 13th day of DIANA's Fame

What's DIANA'S ANCIENT ROMAN or GREEK MYTHOLOGICAL Name?

GODDESS of the MOON.

What happened to DIANA (Goddess of the MOON) on the 31st of AUGUST?

SHE WAS MURDERED, or as most believe, SACRIFICED on the FULL MOON of the 31st of the 8th month.

What's happening today the 31st of the 8th month? ITS A FULL BLUE MOON on the 15th ANNIVERSARY of DIANA'S Fame

or in other words... the DATE of this VOLCANIC AWAKENING in ALASKA occurred/BEGAN on a FULL MOON and ANNIVERSARY of DIANA'S (Goddess of the MOON) FAMOUS but tragic SACRIFICE.

;)

Now lets see what other major events and anomalies connect this month.to this prophetic warning.

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/01/2012 10:32 AM

OP, there are times in life when you run across people that have discovered things so profound that it seriously upsets the status quo of what we hold to be true, and reveals the world is NOT what it appears to be.

You are one of those. Thank you.

Gave you the one star click you deserved OPie.

Gave you five stars and pin suggest OP!

You are a dumbass! You forget to take your meds?

I'm with you and a believer. I have followed your threads. Thanks for all your research and time you put into your work.

What do you think about the solar flare that erupted yesterday. Some state earth faced, others say not, I don't think we are out if the woods yet in regards to this flare.

THANK YOU! I appreciate those words my friend.

as to your last question....

Let me put it this way... I wouldn't have reiterated this threads warning again if I didn't agree with you ;)))

YES!!! U ROk!!!



Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/01/2012 10:23 AM

NO, thank YOU.

Knowing what I'm doing is being understood by a few like you, gives me hope that the new era coming will have a new breed of leadership and a mindset capable of bringing back this lost ancient science of Sacred Geometry to the next generation which will again be able to Harness the ENERGY of these "Ley-Lines" and BUILD structures like the Pyramids only by PURE THOUGHT!



Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/01/2012 10:57 AM

YES

Thanks for the answer. I believe this to be intriguing, but I would like to know the nature if this cycle. How are you counting 188, and why? If there are dozens of quakes that fit the parameters, then there would be many other ranges in between quakes, not just 188. I have looked into this before with an open mind, and did not see a reason to apply 188, when I could apply other values for ranges, and even see what appears to be a pattern.

I'm genuinely interested in this if you can provide data that shows 188 has more weight than any other number.

So the quakes I focus on then, are closer to minimum 6.0 in counting for hits on the ley lines. However, my standard for quakes that would validate a prediction, the standard mag is closer to a minimum 6.5+.

As for the 188 cycle... the parameter for quakes that qualify as a validation, is narrowed down to those 7+ absolute minimum which would again also depend on LOCATION and DEPTH since a 7 MAG under a major metropolitan city would probably do serious damage versus it hitting a remote location.

The only other issue i haven't discussed here yet has to do with the other classifications of LARGE versus MAJOR or MEGA and GREAT.

hope that helps or addresses your question.

lNIN

So the quakes I focus on then, are closer to minimum 6.0 in counting for hits on the ley lines. However, my standard for quakes that would validate a prediction, the standard mag is closer to a minimum 6.5+.

As for the 188 cycle... the parameter for quakes that qualify as a validation, is narrowed down to those 7+ absolute minimum which would again also depend on LOCATION and DEPTH since a 7 MAG under a major metropolitan city would probably do serious damage versus it hitting a remote location.

The only other issue i haven't discussed here yet has to do with the other classifications of LARGE versus MAJOR or MEGA and GREAT.

hope that helps or addresses your question.

lNIN



Ok, but what do you do with quakes above 7 that are not on the 188 cycle?

Since 2010, there have been nearly 30 7+. What do you do with them?

Ok, but what do you do with quakes above 7 that are not on the 188 cycle?

Since 2010, there have been nearly 30 7+. What do you do with them?

MatrixLNIN11 -

Something extraordinarily bizarre just happened.

Take a look at the message I wrote you above on 11:49. I hit "send" and I did a double-take because you had a reply to the message at the very instant I sent it -- proof is in the fact that the system merged our messages into one!!

You seemed to have answered my question AT THE SAME TIME I WROTE IT, without knowing what I was writing.

Then at 11:59, your actual reply came in as it would have normally, but at no time did the system treat them as independent messages?????

Ok .. this one just left me like this..

5 stars for this thread OP

[link to scienceray.com]

that is odd....

hmmmmmmmmm

That is VERY interesting! Thank you for posting that info.

this latest CME should have just begun to arrive around this timeframe.

but whether or not any real effects are felt, we're only in the first 3 days of September ;/

seems you're among the very FEW that noticed the significance yet.

hehe

did you know there was actually ANOTHER volcanic awakening as well on that DATE?

so is it a coincidence a KEY date I warned about FIRE RISING from BELOW, correlated to TWO headlines of a VOLCANIC awakening?

;)))

have you seen my 212 warning last year? A few here might remember... if enjoyed this coded warning or allegory, you might like that one just as much.

and here the 3rd volcanic event for the DATE I warned about connected to FIRE RISING FROM BELOW

[link to theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com]

ALASKA (harp)
CHILE (CHILLES)
RUSSIA (alaska REGION)

;)

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/04/2012 04:46 AM

I think you're missing the significance and context of this anomaly and stats in a broader picture let alone the fact that most of the TYPES of quakes that generally correlate to this cycle, have been extremely unique and unusually powerful... that cannot be denied.

the 188 cycle occurs no more than 2 times a year and the context of what you're saying suggests that all 7 mags are the same which they are not.

furthermore, when you realize the cycle only happens twice a year, the only way to truly understand or see the significance of it, is to analyze it not only in totality over a larger cross-secton of TIME, but you also have to take into account the FACT that the Quakes that correlate, have in upwards of 80 to 90% of the cases, hit EXACT dates within a +/- 1 to 3 day window of it let alone the past 5 TIMES IN A ROW.

For MAJOR QUAKES especially those that fall into a category of MEGA quakes (that DO NOT HAPPEN all the time as most try to claim) to hit a precise pattern over and over, is compelling evidence that this "cycle" is not the random type of coincidence skeptics would like people to believe.

once you analyze the stats, you can see that 7+ quakes happen on average in general, MAYBE 1-2 times a month (even though that average and my point is validated with the recent LULL in such quakes since april). The odds of a cycle that only happens 2 times a year having such quakes that are usually far more powerful than the average 7 mag, hit within a 1-3 day window 5 TIMES IN A ROW, is again, compelling evidence supporting my argument and validating this cycle to be far beyond coincidence.

If you still think its no big deal and this cycle's credence is based on playing known predictable statistics etc, then lets see you or those claiming this, pick 2 dates out of 365 days to have a MAJOR 7+ where at least 1 of those quakes is a GREAT QUAKE or 8+ hit within 3 days of the date, and DO IT 5 TIMES IN A ROW as well as showing how the dates or cycle you choose, can be correlated back at least 200 years and have an accuracy hit ratio of at least 70% to 80%.

Thats the kind of context one must factor in before dismissing this using the argument about statistics and other 7 mags not on the 188 cycle.

hopefully that addresses your question a bit more.

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 09/03/2012 07:37 AM

Has there ever been a time wave zero drop like the one that's coming up on 9/16? It just looks so significant.